Butterfly-newbie
cmkultradome
Registered Users Posts: 516 Major grins
I took this last summer in Maine with my Kodak point and shoot. I just got my first digital SLR (Rebel xTi) in December and I can't wait for summer. I love this site, I've been lurking for a while. I don't have a big budget but based on advise from this forum I think I'm going to buy the Kenko tubes (from Hong Kong so they fit my EF-S lens) to try and take some Macro shots. Thanks for all the tips.
Stephanie
Stephanie
0
Comments
This is a lovely shot Stephanie.
I'm super impressed with the flower the butterfly is sitting on
How pretty is that plant they way it hangs with its white clusters.
You should have a heap of fun with the Kenkos when you get them.
Can't wait to see how you go.
Enjoy the forums Stephanie, glad you've chose to join us here at Dgrin
... Skippy
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
One big difference you will notice between the P&S and a DSLR at macro magnifications is the difference in apparent DOF.
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
Another very new poster here, who was not too long ago in pretty much the exact same situation, with a bit of advice regarding the extension tubes:
I think you may find that the tubes, even just a 12mm tube, may cause an EF-S zoom to focus extremely close, and probably too close.
A year ago I did a backyard modification of the Kenko EF tubes to fit EF-S (pretty simple with a dremel or file, actually) and found that my 17-85 actually focussed on the dust on the UV filter (!!!) with just 12mm of extension attached (@85mm). I had been modifying the tubes for a friend, who was using the EF-S 18-55, and she eventually went for the 50 f1.8 instead, for similar reasons.
I know it never helps to add things to the shopping list, but the Canon 50 1.8 is dirt cheap new, cheaper used (often less than the tubes, actually), and has a working distance of 3-4 cm w/68mm of extension, which is just enough for some extreme macro without constantly banging it against the subject. The math and optics of all this escapes me, but I think it must have something to do with the zoom design of these lenses that makes them behave differently with extension tubes. You might consider a close-up filter if you want to stick with the same lens.
I would have to say, however, that the 50 + tubes is the most satisfying learning curve I can remember!
And with all this technical nonsense out of the way, my compliments on the shot!! The flower gently tapering off is beautiful!
Stephanie
The 50f1.8 and Kenko tubes are what I've had great experiences with, I doubt there's anything wrong with the tubes from Hong-Kong, convenience might be the only point against them, if that's an issue.
And yes, the 50f1.8 is a very fun lens to have, and for a lot more than macro too: