I don't know the technique...

used2jeepused2jeep Registered Users Posts: 8 Beginner grinner
edited February 16, 2008 in Technique
...that I am trying to describe but it makes a picture look surreal. I remember seeing/reading something about 3 different shots and something about 'raw'. I think one of the examples was of a desert photo with a canyon road.

That is the thing that I would like to learn how to do...but before I can learn how to do it I need to know what it is called. :scratch

Can anyone help me out?

Comments

  • Eric&SusanEric&Susan Registered Users Posts: 1,280 Major grins
    edited February 13, 2008
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging

    Also many people use this program to achieve the HDR look:

    http://www.hdrsoft.com/

    Eric
    "My dad taught me everything I know, unfortunately he didn't teach me everything he knows" Dale Earnhardt Jr

    It's better to be hated for who you are than to be loved for who you're not.

    http://photosbyeric.smugmug.com
  • gluwatergluwater Registered Users Posts: 3,599 Major grins
    edited February 13, 2008
    Exposure bracketing or HDR possibly?
    Nick
    SmugMug Technical Account Manager
    Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
    nickwphoto
  • Glenn NKGlenn NK Registered Users Posts: 268 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2008
    "Surreal" seems to have a wide range of interpretations, (by definition, something above or beyond reality, or something dreamlike); it's a rather nebulous description that would be difficult to quantify without an example.

    There are many techniques in PS that will produce surreal images; "filters" in addition to layering and masking techniques are likely candidates.
    "There is nothing that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers price only is that man’s lawful prey". John Ruskin 1819 - 1900
  • idleberryidleberry Registered Users Posts: 10 Big grins
    edited February 16, 2008
    HDR. :)

    I liked it, for a bit, but I'm a fan of it being used sparingly, because if it's overcooked, it just looks horrible (to me). Kinda like those soft focus "vaseline round the edge" type piccies of the 80s.

    Anyway. Photoshop is good, but even better is photomatix pro.

    http://www.hdrsoft.com/
  • Slinky0390Slinky0390 Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2008
    HDR can be quite pleasing to the eyes if done to add depth to the picture. When people start to blow out all the exposure ranges, it looses it value (at least to me) i'd rather see a regular photo with no processing than one with overkill HDR.
    Canon eos 30d; EF 17-40 f/4.0L; EF 24-85mm f/3.5; EF 50mm f/1.4; EF 70-200mm f/4.0L; Unicorns of various horn lenghts
    http://slinky0390.smugmug.com
Sign In or Register to comment.