Still Life

tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
edited March 24, 2005 in Holy Macro
Making a stab at some "classic" still lifes. Comments/critiques welcome. Catchy title eh?
18086371-L.jpg
f/2.8 2.5s ISO 100 FL 100 Tungsten lighting
Thomas :D

TML Photography
tmlphoto.com

Comments

  • ShakeyShakey Registered Users Posts: 1,004 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2005
    I can't shot a still life if it jumped out and bit me so I am no real judge.
    I can only go on what I have seen and what I enjoy. And I am not inspired by this. It is not composition or technical flaws, it is the subject matter for me.
    Just a personal thing I guessne_nau.gif

    Tim
  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2005
    Shakey wrote:
    I can't shot a still life if it jumped out and bit me so I am no real judge.
    I can only go on what I have seen and what I enjoy. And I am not inspired by this. It is not composition or technical flaws, it is the subject matter for me.
    Just a personal thing I guessne_nau.gif

    Tim
    I guess still lifes are not too exciting. Just something to play around with when I'm stuck in the house in the evenings. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • KhaosKhaos Registered Users Posts: 2,435 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2005
    I like it. I think doing selective color on this one but with only the background being color might be cool. Of course the background may not be worth it.ne_nau.gif

    Still life is tough to make interesting in photos. Generally the only thing in paintings that make it worth while is the artists talent at capturing light. I think in photography, it is getting an unique way to light the still life or play with color so one looks at it differently than they would any other time.
Sign In or Register to comment.