Filter/Polarizing !!!!
Freezframe
Registered Users Posts: 246 Major grins
Pros & Cons between 100.00$ and 200.00$ Filters....I guess I'm looking for any huge differences !
Brady :dunno
Brady :dunno
Dad/Photograher:ivar
0
Comments
For me i find no reason to change from this brand at this price.
Generally, non coated filters cost the least, single coated ones a bit more, and multicoated ones the most.
Multicoated filters tend to reduce flare and prevent loss of contrast better than single or non coated filters.
I personally have not seen any good tests online comparing a non/single coated polarizer vs a multicoated polarizer from a same brand so I can't say the difference is visible since I've no prints or images that show a direct comparisons.
I did have a cheap polarizer which gave a small color cast so replaced it with a Hoya single coated polarizer and found it's colors to be better.
I think if you are going to be a serious user of polarizers, then I'd probably get the best, if this is a once in a while filter, then it maybe worth getting a cheap one and save the dough.
Ebay seems to be the place for everything......Unfortunatly I lost money on Ebay and will have no more of that ......
Thanx for reply: Brady
Was definitely thinking multicoated Hoya ....Just don't want any suprises !!!
I have to travel a little distance for all my photo supplies .Just want advice on brands for a little piece of mind !!!!
Thanx: Brady
I find that a rather blinkered outlook...honestly.
Sure...you dont go buying the latest laptop or iphone from nigeria. There are plenty of reputable people still slugging away on ebay...that one in particular has almost 20k sales at 99%. I seriously doubt he is out to make a quick $50 from you. There are plenty like him. You are however ...always welcome in this world to pay more though.
It was the way ebay treated me that leaves a bad taste in my mouth....It's a long story that happened about 2 years ago.....They had a big problem with scammers at the time ....Some were takin care of and, some weren't ....
Thanx Again: Brady
You have a great eye and a vivid imagination !!!!
Great Stuff: Brady
I don't think the optics of hte B&W's are better but the filter thread of the B&W's are smoother and they seem easier to clean than Hoya's.
Im rather light handed with them these days. Hell...maybe i should even look at spending more and try a B&W.
I recently bought a B&W slim pol filter but haven't got around to using it since the weather is all bleh here now. i'm sure i'll love it on a bounty island next summer
The B+W slim filters don't have a female thread for connection for lens cap. Inconvenient!
I was put off cheap polarisers after I noticed dreadful noise in the blue channel when converted to Black and White.
Since then I have got Hoya for the wide angle ( takes the lens cap) and B+W for other sizes
...pics..
Based on reading far too many filter threads here & at FM I would recommend the B+W polarizer over the Hoya. At hvstar, I would go a step further and say go ahead & get the Kaesemann version; it's only a few dollars more & is supposed to have better polarizing foils in addition to edge sealing. The B+W filters normally use brass rings which is what makes them easier to use (though there are "alloy" ones available through hvstar--skip those). Also, I've read many instances of the Hoya CPL falling apart where the retaining ring fialed & fell out; never heard to the same happening with B+W.
I have the B+W Kaesemann standard width filter & it's served me well. On my 20D & Tokina 12-24 there is no vignetting.
http://www.chrislaudermilkphoto.com/