As a shot for texture I like it, but it's not woody/grainy looking enough.
The bark doesn't have a great lot of fine detail in it.
You could easily say it's a rock formation if you know what I mean?
It's a good shot, what does the colour version look like?
Thanks for sharing ... Skippy
.
For a rock it would have to be petrified wood for that knot to be there. Come on Ms CSI!
Don Ricklin - Gear: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, was Pentax K7
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook.
Skippy, I understand what you mean about it not looking woody enough or looking similar to stone. I felt is was so rough yet non descript, almost abstract, so I labelled it oak so everyone would know what it is. The color version was fairly lack-luster, but the B&W allowed me to bump the contrast to what you see here.
Comments
As a shot for texture I like it, but it's not woody/grainy looking enough.
The bark doesn't have a great lot of fine detail in it.
You could easily say it's a rock formation if you know what I mean?
It's a good shot, what does the colour version look like?
Thanks for sharing
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook .
Skippy, I understand what you mean about it not looking woody enough or looking similar to stone. I felt is was so rough yet non descript, almost abstract, so I labelled it oak so everyone would know what it is. The color version was fairly lack-luster, but the B&W allowed me to bump the contrast to what you see here.