Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6...
Does anyone have any experience with this lens
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro
OR
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX DG
Just wanted to know if they were any good. Most of the reviews were positive on b&h but wanted to hear it from some dgrinners.
thanks
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro
OR
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX DG
Just wanted to know if they were any good. Most of the reviews were positive on b&h but wanted to hear it from some dgrinners.
thanks
0
Comments
http://www.youtube.com/user/NYCFilmmakersGroup
http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Filmmakers-and-Actors-Meetup-Group/
The APO version is better than the DL version from what I've read and I 've had the APO version a while ago. If you are looking for a 70-300mm zoom around $200 it's a good lens.
Orv
Thomson, Ga. USA
www.Osalisburyphoto.smugmug.com
I'm trying to decide between
Tamron 18-250 f/3.5-6.3 ($479)
OR
Canon 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS & Canon 55-250 f/4.0-5.6 IS (total $475.00)
Both had similar reviews but I don't know about having 2 lenses vs. just one. It would be more convenient to just have the one for all purpose shooting but the other 2 lenses both are Canon which is nice and have IS. Any input is appreciated.
http://www.youtube.com/user/NYCFilmmakersGroup
http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Filmmakers-and-Actors-Meetup-Group/
Personally, I would go with the two lens kit for two reasons. One is that a 3x zoom makes less optical compromises than a 11x zoom. Optics on the Tamron isn't too good, especially near the long end and if I recall, had more CA than the 18-55IS. The Canon's also come with IS as well.
I think photozone.de has reviewed all of them as well.
here is a series of shots i made a while back in the rotterdam zoo. all with sigma 70-300 APO
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=73680&highlight=rotterdam
I'm not familiar with the other lenses so cant help you there..
AF is not slow, but not fast, the front end rotates, and you need to be careful putting the hood on that you don't tweak the motor.
Sharpness could be better, but could also be a fair bit worse, the real trick is that good exposures at high shutter speeds can show a lot more quality than you even knew the lens had, when it's sunny this lens can surprise me.
If you can deal with all this, congratulations, your wallet thanks you already, and the sigma comes with a good hood, soft case, and a macro mode down to 1:2 which can be a lot of fun (think 300mm working distance macro guys!)
The build of the sigma is nice, too, nothing too fancy, but I've a 17-85 and the sigma simply feels more solid, which I gather is usually a failing of these kinds of zooms. This lens will survive as long as you feel like keeping it.