Please...Need Help Right NOW
Karrie McD
Registered Users Posts: 372 Major grins
I only have a few hours before I go out for the weekend. I have to do a ton of photos tomorrow. My sisters getting married and I am taking the photos. I also have a lot of family photos to do the same day because it is one of the rare times that everyone will be togother. (as weddings usually are) So, I need advice RIGHT NOW!!!!
These are some practice photos I did last night. (they were not suppose to be practice but after looking at them, I see I have to do it over) I can't figure out what I am doing wrong. They are not in focus or the are noisy, or...I dont really know what the problem is can you please let me know what is happing here?
I can't figure it out. :scratch But these photos look really bad to me. It't not where I was focusing is it? I mean, the f/stop was small enough that they should all be in focus wasn't it? The lens I'm using 70-200 f/2.8L should be a sharp lens right! So it's gotta be me right?
(don't worry, I am not charging any money for these photos...I'm still learning)
This is the worst, 40D, 70-200 @ 70, f/8, ISO 250, 1/250, used flash-EX 580 (it was getting late) shot in M
not as bad but still bad, EXIF same as above
the best but still not sharp, EXIF same except f/5.6
is it because I am using flash, is it the difference in the f/stop...
Oh, I shoot RAW and I did no PP just cropped a little and converted to JPG.
These are some practice photos I did last night. (they were not suppose to be practice but after looking at them, I see I have to do it over) I can't figure out what I am doing wrong. They are not in focus or the are noisy, or...I dont really know what the problem is can you please let me know what is happing here?
I can't figure it out. :scratch But these photos look really bad to me. It't not where I was focusing is it? I mean, the f/stop was small enough that they should all be in focus wasn't it? The lens I'm using 70-200 f/2.8L should be a sharp lens right! So it's gotta be me right?
(don't worry, I am not charging any money for these photos...I'm still learning)
This is the worst, 40D, 70-200 @ 70, f/8, ISO 250, 1/250, used flash-EX 580 (it was getting late) shot in M
not as bad but still bad, EXIF same as above
the best but still not sharp, EXIF same except f/5.6
is it because I am using flash, is it the difference in the f/stop...
Oh, I shoot RAW and I did no PP just cropped a little and converted to JPG.
"Whether you think you can or you can't, you are right."
0
Comments
I'm a Nikon Girl:tuesday
www.BriShayPhotography.com
I don't see anything wrong. Actually, they look pretty nice. They look plenty sharp to me, and I don't see any excessive noise. They're too red, but that's probably due to digital with flash, and is easily fixed in post.
Keep breathing. You're good. Everything's fine. Look at the big picture. Remind yourself how much fun photography is.
Work on posing and interacting with the people. Your technique looks fine. All is well. The more confident you are going in, the better your photos will be tomorrow.
Jim
I don't want the cheese, I just want to get out of the trap.
http://www.jimwhitakerphotography.com/
Also, leave the camera in AP mode and adjust the shutter to get the correct exposure.
Take a deep breath. All is well. Here's one of the children I spent 30 seconds on so you can see they're fine.
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Best of luck with the wedding
Chris
:whip
WWW.LONGISLANDIMAGE.COM
I don't want the cheese, I just want to get out of the trap.
http://www.jimwhitakerphotography.com/
I respectfully disagree with Schlegel also.
I would consider raising the ISO to 400 - 640 (ambient light) and using a faster shutter speed (less chance of blur with the 70-200) for those particular shots, but other than that...
The first one is slightly underexposed. Boost it up slightly in RAW and I think you will feel a bit better about it. (I did w/ the jpg and it looked great and the grain disappeared). My observation of my shots and other peoples shots is that the 40D I think tends to give off film like grainy images when where as the XTi tends to give of red dots of noise. To solve it you have to either take it right in the camera or fix it in RAW or PP.
Leave a lil space for a crop. I have to print an 8 x 10 family photo out now and I think I'm going to lose half a person on both sides. :cry
dak.smugmug.com
Your right, I was not paying attention.
because not everyone will be at the same focus distance.
Opening to f/2.8 would be a bad thing (although tempting because of the light). If you were doing ONE person, that would be fine. For a group, that's a recipe for blurry images.
David
Twitter: @WolfSnap
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WolfSnapDesigns
SmugMug & Wordpress Customization - WolfSnap.com | Custom Domains
As for the noise... at 250 iso and 1/250 of a second, there shouldn't be any discernable. Is the noise present in the RAW image? Did you raise the exposure in the RAW converter?
I agree with Swartzy on the flash. Its close but could use a little more balance with the ambient. That is hard to judge using the LCD in sunlight. A flash meter definitely helps in this situation.
My Images | My Lessons Learned and Other Adventures
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
to
Great shot and
Have fun with wedding!
dak.smugmug.com
Resize it in PS from 8x12 - don't crop it - make the whole image a bit smaller
Put a border on it to equal 8x10
And no cut off.
Flash Frozen Photography, Inc.
http://flashfrozenphotography.com
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
As far as the pics I think they do look just a tad fuzzy. I don't know if camera shake is coming into play at all but 1/112 is the lowest usable shutter speed to avoid shake (shutter=1/focal length x 1.6 crop factor... shutter=1/70x1.6= 1/112). As long as you stay above you should be able to avoid camera shake.
If you shoot in RAW mode, noise should be less of an issue. Your posted examples do appear to have a bit more jpg artifacts especially in the shadows (dark suit jackets and blacks). Plus raw will give you more latitude if you have to correct any exposures.
The pictures do look good to me. What you're refering to appears minor to me all of which can be corrected a bit of post processing.
Good luck with the wedding. I'll be shooting one myself as well!
EOS 50D, 30D, Sigma 50-150 f/2.8, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, MF Pentax 50 f/1.4, MF 70-200 f/4.0, and a MF 200 f/4 adapted for Canon, Canon 580EXII and 430EX, 2 Vivitar 285HV's and many various modifiers.
http://www.markwphoto.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/markwphoto/
WOW! Talk about support!!! Thank you all so much! I was able to read most of these replies before I had to take off for the wedding. I am sorry I did not have time to reply with my appriciation to you all first.
Your replies and encouragement helped me a lot. I was so distressed over the noise in those photos but after seeing them with some actual PP done I know they are fine and I felt better.
I am sure the family will be super pleased with their photos, especially since they didn't cost them anything.
My sis's wedding was, well...a mess!!! I'm not even exagerating. If it could go wrong, it went wrong. The groom kept coming up missing in action, the cupcakes (she had cupcakes instead of a cake) came out over cooked, or undercooked, the dresses didn't get sized right, half the people in the wedding didn't show up to the rehersal (including the groom), the hairdresser never showed up, the food was 3 hours late and that is just a quick summary. There is more...
Here comes the bride (and groom's daughter)
Here comes the...rain!!!
Here comes the bride (again)
Let me add here that in the rush to get in out of the rain and up the stairs not to miss a thing, I broke my 580 off camera flash cord. I was using my 580 and flash bracket for my lighting. In the moment, I thougtht that my 580 itself was broken so throughout the ceremony I had one hand on the camera and one hand holding the flash over the camera. It sucked, my hand got tired and shakey and I could not zoom in or out becuase I didn't have a spare hand. Needless to say, my lovely sister does not have too many photos of the actual ceremony... :cry
the bagger got kicked down to the bottom of the stairs...those things are loud, especially in a house!!!
man, my arms/hands were tired (using a 40D and the 24-70 f/2.8L...very heavy) by the time the kiss shot came around, but, I cought it.
After the ceremony was over I ran up and down the stairs (3 story house) to quickly set up one of my Bees and shot the "formals".
the only shots (as far as the wedding is concerned) that I like are my ring shots
Anyways...as you can see, it was some experience! My first time as the wedding photographer...damn, I know why you all get the big bucks!!!! Needless to say by the end of the night we just let it all go... including ourselves...
The night ended with the spins...in more ways than one...
That is me in the green, so obviously I did not take the last photo.
After all that, it actually was one of the best nights I have had in a long long time. My sis had a great time too and that is all that really matters.
Again thank you all for your help and encouragment.
And last...yes, I know...I can't spell
Oh, and this is why you always have two of everything that might break. I do have to say you recovered very well and I'm surprise you don't have carpel tunnel now!
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
Thanks Scott. I will be buying two new cords. And, I believe I may need physical therapy for my wrists.
The pics look great despite all the problems of the day. I couldn't imagine juggling the flash and camera while shooting. My wrist are already tired from just using my camera with the grip. lol. Great work and I'm sure your sister will love the pics.
EOS 50D, 30D, Sigma 50-150 f/2.8, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, MF Pentax 50 f/1.4, MF 70-200 f/4.0, and a MF 200 f/4 adapted for Canon, Canon 580EXII and 430EX, 2 Vivitar 285HV's and many various modifiers.
http://www.markwphoto.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/markwphoto/
My Images | My Lessons Learned and Other Adventures
I see no focus or noise issues.
Did you ever go over ISO 250?
Hope the bagpipe isn't scratching up the artwork.
Looks like you have two sweet group photos now.
They should be happy, even with the one you didn't take. You can't tell anything went wrong during the day!
dak.smugmug.com
I'm a Nikon Girl:tuesday
www.BriShayPhotography.com