I need a blower... (poll on what you use)

i_worship_the_Kingi_worship_the_King Registered Users Posts: 548 Major grins
edited May 6, 2008 in Accessories
Since I've seen good and bad things about several blowers, I figure a poll of the pros will solidify the purchase.
I make it policy to never let ignorance stand in the way of my opinion. ~Justiceiro

"Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros."
~Herbert Keppler

Whats your preference? 34 votes

Rocket Blower (small / spherical)
20% 7 votes
Rocket Blower (medium / elongated)
17% 6 votes
Rocket Blower (large / elongated)
41% 14 votes
Hurricane Blower
20% 7 votes

Comments

  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2008
    You need a poll for this :Dheadscratch.gif

    Get the big Giottos you'll be happy.
  • lendur2lendur2 Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited April 25, 2008
    Since I've seen good and bad things about several blowers, I figure a poll of the pros will solidify the purchase.
    Have you considered going to your local pharmacy and getting a child's ear syringe?
  • i_worship_the_Kingi_worship_the_King Registered Users Posts: 548 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2008
    Actually, I only purchase from B&H - and since they're closed I'll fill the time with this poll.

    My only concern is that I don't use a 400mm or something lens, so I was thinking the small might be better for for my bag.
    I make it policy to never let ignorance stand in the way of my opinion. ~Justiceiro

    "Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros."
    ~Herbert Keppler
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited April 25, 2008
    lendur2 wrote:
    Have you considered going to your local pharmacy and getting a child's ear syringe?

    Have you considered that there might be talcum powder, or mold release grease in drug store bulb syringes that are designed for sucking things out of babies, and not designed for blowing clean air onto camera sensors? Companies like Giottos make their bulbs specifically for optical use, and their reputations are on the line if they spew foreign matter on your sensor. The same probably won't hold true for the Chinese manufacturer of the baby syringe.

    BTW, welcome to Dgrin.clap.gif
  • Manfr3dManfr3d Registered Users Posts: 2,008 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2008
    Andy wrote:
    You need a poll for this :Dheadscratch.gif

    Get the big Giottos you'll be happy.

    Or use the search function mwink.gif
    “To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
    ― Edward Weston
  • i_worship_the_Kingi_worship_the_King Registered Users Posts: 548 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2008
    Manfr3d wrote:
    Or use the search function mwink.gif

    Did. Didn't see a poll. Reading 15 threads is all fine and dandy, I need numbers.:D
    I make it policy to never let ignorance stand in the way of my opinion. ~Justiceiro

    "Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros."
    ~Herbert Keppler
  • SamSam Registered Users Posts: 7,419 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2008
    I don't know where it's at, but someone designed a blower with a negative ion generator attached. You want the best? Get this one.

    Sam
  • evorywareevoryware Registered Users Posts: 1,330 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2008
    I have the small that came with the kit. If I was just getting the blower I'd get the large. There's like a $1 difference between all three.
    That said, I've used mine once since I got my XTi over a year ago and that was to blow some dust off the viewfinder. It worked very well on my XT.
    Canon 40D : Canon 400D : Canon Elan 7NE : Canon 580EX : 2 x Canon 430EX : Canon 24-70 f2.8L : Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM : Canon 28-135mm f/3.5 IS : 18-55mm f/3.5 : 4GB Sandisk Extreme III : 2GB Sandisk Extreme III : 2 x 1GB Sandisk Ultra II : Sekonik L358

    dak.smugmug.com
  • LovesongLovesong Registered Users Posts: 56 Big grins
    edited April 27, 2008
    Sam wrote:
    I don't know where it's at, but someone designed a blower with a negative ion generator attached. You want the best? Get this one.

    Sam

    You're talking about the FireFly...
    http://www.nrdfirefly.com/

    I still don't think it's worth $200. A Giotto costs $15, and when you get a fingerprint on your lens, you're still going to have to wipe the lens with a tissue (and maybe some lens cleaner).
  • Glenn NKGlenn NK Registered Users Posts: 268 Major grins
    edited May 1, 2008
    Frankly, I prefer Dust-Aid over a bulb blower.

    A bulb blower by any name uses ambient air - which is full of dust.

    Compressed gas is filtered and dried - and the difluorethane will NOT harm the innards of a camera in spite of what "they" say.

    As to the morality of using a compressed refrigerant I may be guilty, but the stuff does work.

    Just don't keep the trigger pressed for minutes on end and not expect to freeze anything.rolleyes1.gif

    Oh, and don't put your head in a bag and fill the bag with the gas - that's as dumb as it gets.
    "There is nothing that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers price only is that man’s lawful prey". John Ruskin 1819 - 1900
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited May 2, 2008
    Well, I use this.

    It works great and cost $8 at the drugstore.
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    kdog wrote:
    Have you considered that there might be talcum powder
    I actually washed out my rocket blower on that reason. I have no idea if it had talc inside or not (i doubt it did) however washing it in clean water alone & leaving it several days to dry wasnt going to hurt it.
  • darkdragondarkdragon Registered Users Posts: 1,051 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    Angelo wrote:
    Well, I use this.

    It works great and cost $8 at the drugstore.

    That just seems gross.

    But hey, if it works it works. I just take my cam to the store when I need the sensor dusted or cleaned - let them have the liablility for messing it up. :D
    ~ Lisa
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    darkdragon wrote:
    let them have the liablility for messing it up. :D
    Ive just cleaned mine with the Copperhill method. If you can walk & chew gum at the same time...you can clean your own sensor. Honestly its a very basic operation...give it a try.
  • darkdragondarkdragon Registered Users Posts: 1,051 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    gus wrote:
    Ive just cleaned mine with the Copperhill method. If you can walk & chew gum at the same time...you can clean your own sensor. Honestly its a very basic operation...give it a try.

    I'm sure I CAN do it, but I don't want to - don't see why. IF I mess up then I have to replace/repair. Let the store do it for free and if the mess it up they repair it. Seems like a no-brainer to me. I don't need the stress :D
    ~ Lisa
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited May 2, 2008
    darkdragon wrote:
    I'm sure I CAN do it, but I don't want to - don't see why. IF I mess up then I have to replace/repair. Let the store do it for free and if the mess it up they repair it. Seems like a no-brainer to me. I don't need the stress :D

    Please tell us all which store does a wet clean for free and 20,000 grinners will descend upon their threshold tomorrow.
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited May 2, 2008
    darkdragon wrote:
    That just seems gross.

    But hey, if it works it works. I just take my cam to the store when I need the sensor dusted or cleaned - let them have the liablility for messing it up. :D

    what exactly is gross about it? it's a rubber bulb with a tube attachment. just like the rocket and others.

    I do hope you realize I'm not suggesting shared use of the implement. lol3.gif
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    Nervously avoiding angelos post...i just wanted to show what a total novice can do with the 'copper hill' method even though i got so caught up about cleaning the sensor...i forgot to blow it first.

    oh & about $0.80 a cleaning pad.

    My 30D before (an hour or so ago)


    288620120_aqFU8-L.jpg


    ...and 15 mins later. The paper (envelope) has a few blemishes on it btw.

    I have got one small hair on the bottom there which dragged off the pad in a pass so i will have to do that bit the other way.

    288620207_dX6CP-L.jpg
  • Ric GrupeRic Grupe Registered Users Posts: 9,522 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    Angelo wrote:
    .I do hope you realize I'm not suggesting shared use of the implement. lol3.gif

    wings.gifivarwings.gif

    You da man, Angelo!thumb.gif
  • Glenn NKGlenn NK Registered Users Posts: 268 Major grins
    edited May 5, 2008
    Perhaps we should use a straw, take a deep breath and blow onto the sensor - the advantage being that the air expelled from one's lungs has been filtered.

    . . . . . whereas the air from ANY kind of rubber bulb has dusty air in it (unless it's been used for something else.)rolleyes1.gif
    "There is nothing that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers price only is that man’s lawful prey". John Ruskin 1819 - 1900
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2008
    Glenn NK wrote:
    Perhaps we should use a straw, take a deep breath and blow onto the sensor - the advantage being that the air expelled from one's lungs has been filtered.

    . . . . . whereas the air from ANY kind of rubber bulb has dusty air in it (unless it's been used for something else.)rolleyes1.gif
    I hope no-one tries this...you will put micro drops of saliva/moisture from your breath or onto your sensor.
  • Glenn NKGlenn NK Registered Users Posts: 268 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2008
    gus wrote:
    I hope no-one tries this...you will put micro drops of saliva/moisture from your breath or onto your sensor.


    OK, I'll tell you a good one.

    JimH at dpreview and I discussed the cleaning of sensors about a year ago. In private correspondence, he told me that he breathes gently on the sensor, and uses a Q-tip type of swab from Walgrens' to clean his sensor. He claims he's been using it for several years and has no dust spots at all and no scratches on the sensor (a 10D or 20D I believe).

    I get the impression that he is a compentent and knowledgeable photographer. As they say, different strokes for different folks.

    PS - I have used the method with "Johnson and Johnson" Q-Tips (registered trademark), and other than the odd cotton fibre that was easily blown off with the compresses gas, it worked quite well. There are too many of us that are completely inane when it comes to sensor cleaning.

    BTW Gus, how did your sensor get so filthy? The "before" shot is positively horrid.
    "There is nothing that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers price only is that man’s lawful prey". John Ruskin 1819 - 1900
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2008
    Glenn NK wrote:

    BTW Gus, how did your sensor get so filthy? The "before" shot is positively horrid.

    Dirty ?

    Here it is about 3 months back...i recon it must have 'self cleaned' headscratch.gif as i dont clean it.

    Really i dont care about it that much...i used to absolutely baby my AE-1 but these days bodies are obsolete before they are worn out from dust etc.

    Only reason i cleaned is that im going over seas on a short holiday in the pacific & i dont want 5 months of cloning dust from skies & landscape stuff.

    177699904_Ekj43-L.jpg
  • cmasoncmason Registered Users Posts: 2,506 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2008
    darkdragon wrote:
    I'm sure I CAN do it, but I don't want to - don't see why. IF I mess up then I have to replace/repair. Let the store do it for free and if the mess it up they repair it. Seems like a no-brainer to me. I don't need the stress :D


    DarkDragon: most stores typically blow the dust off, at least that is what I have read...they don't want the liability either mwink.gif. There are tons of stories on this website alone, of folks who took their camera in for a cleaning and got it back no better or worse than when they took it in. Do not assume that because a store does it that they do it to YOUR satisfaction. Oh and never seen sensor cleaning for free anywhere, usually it is $50 or so.

    In my experience, blowing doesn't work when you have stubborn dust. I too use the Copperhill method, and it is simple.

    Rest assured, you are not touching the sensor. You are touching a filter on top of the sensor. You will not damage the sensor, so don't worry. If you do the Copperhill method, you are using very high quality lens cleaning materials (vs say Q tips). They work...I tried mine on my lens first just to see if there was residue, scratching etc. Even tried it on my Cokin filter, which isn't glass. If I don't scratch that, I won't scratch the filter over the sensor. It was fine.

    You will find, just as Gus has, that cleaning will be needed when you least expect it, typically the nght before you need your camera. Learn to do this yourself, and then you won't worry about it anymore.
Sign In or Register to comment.