FS: Nikon 70-300 VR

rspartsrsparts Registered Users Posts: 217 Major grins
edited May 9, 2008 in Nikon Land
I have the chance to pick up a Nikon 70-300mm VR lense off of craiglist for $350. I already have the 70-200 so do you think it would be beneficial for me to have the 300 too? It has less than 25 clicks on it
www.phillipsphotography.org

Comments

  • The MackThe Mack Registered Users Posts: 602 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    rsparts wrote:
    I have the chance to pick up a Nikon 70-300mm VR lense off of craiglist for $350. I already have the 70-200 so do you think it would be beneficial for me to have the 300 too? It has less than 25 clicks on it

    I wouldn't say it's "needed" but if you got money to spend sure.
    70-200 > 70-300 anyday
    eric-mack.com
  • rspartsrsparts Registered Users Posts: 217 Major grins
    edited May 2, 2008
    The Mack wrote:
    I wouldn't say it's "needed" but if you got money to spend sure.
    70-200 > 70-300 anyday


    i opted against the 300mm. I figured the money would be better spent on some more tattoo work
    www.phillipsphotography.org
  • VycorVycor Registered Users Posts: 386 Major grins
    edited May 3, 2008
    If i didn't have my 80-400 sigma with OS i'd pick this up. still tempted to as its a smaller lense and will fit in my bag a lot easier...
    Adam Daley
    www.adamdaley.com
    www.fdphotos.net
  • Red JRed J Registered Users Posts: 57 Big grins
    edited May 3, 2008
    Why not get the teleconverter instead?

    Only reason to buy the 70-300 would be to have a lighter weight telephoto.
  • rspartsrsparts Registered Users Posts: 217 Major grins
    edited May 3, 2008
    Red J wrote:
    Why not get the teleconverter instead?

    Only reason to buy the 70-300 would be to have a lighter weight telephoto.


    hm i could do that. i didn't even think of that
    www.phillipsphotography.org
  • Old Man of the ZOld Man of the Z Registered Users Posts: 1 Beginner grinner
    edited May 9, 2008
    rsparts wrote:
    hm i could do that. i didn't even think of that

    The real problem with a tele converter is that it would be relegated to a daytime lens. The aperture is small enough on these zoom lenses. You might not have enough light for the focusing... or viewing for that matter.
Sign In or Register to comment.