Nikon D2x comments.

4labs

Well I have the Nikon D2X a little over a week now and I have totally mixed feelings about it. I love the ergs of it, it is extremely intuitive all the controls are right where they should be. All in all just extremely comfortable. I am extremely frustrated buy the amount of post processing needed to fully take advantage of the cameras capability. If I was more proficient at it I am sure I would be totally happy with it. It has been mentioned several times by Shay, Andy and several others that it isn't the camera it's the person behind it that takes great photographs. I am a living breathing billboard for that sentiment. You live and learn ...

clicket

4labs wrote:

Well I have the Nikon D2X a little over a week now and I have totally mixed feelings about it. I love the ergs of it, it is extremely intuitive all the controls are right where they should be. All in all just extremely comfortable. I am extremely frustrated buy the amount of post processing needed to fully take advantage of the cameras capability. If I was more proficient at it I am sure I would be totally happy with it. It has been mentioned several times by Shay, Andy and several others that it isn't the camera it's the person behind it that takes great photographs. I am a living breathing billboard for that sentiment. You live and learn ...

May I ask what other camera(s) you were using before ?
What is the most critical step in your workflow at this time ?

JohnR

I'm jealous!

Yeah, what camera are you coming from? From what I have read, the D2X really "demands" really good glass.

4labs

clicket wrote:

May I ask what other camera(s) you were using before ?
What is the most critical step in your workflow at this time ?

I was using a D100 and for my skill level it was fine. There are two things that have been tricky with the D2x. I had read that you could almost exclusively use Auto White balance, and the sharpening that has to be done post is surprising. I think sometimes it is my focusing but definately not the glass.

Matthew Saville

For sharpening, try turning the radius way down (into the decimal places) and the power / intensity way up (past 200-300). That I have found is what works best with the D2x images I've been able to get my grubby, un-worthy hands on... But yeah, you'd be surprised at what R 0.2/0.3 and Intensity 400-500 can do! Give that a try...

And yes, when you try to pull 12 megapixels out of a 1.5x cropped sensor, you have to be using the best glass possible, otherwise you're just throwing away resolution. And even the old 35mm glass, at least on the wide end, isn't going to cut it if you're trying to push the envelope and print 24x36" etc etc... Gotta be DX glass. I've shot with the legendary 17-35 f/2.8 and even with 6 megapixels on my D70, I can see that the extreme edges really suffer when I'm at 17mm.

Congrats on the D2x, and happy shooting! Post an image or two or link us to where you've posted them?

Thanks,
-matt-

USAIR

4labs
Just my 2 cents

I also have the same problem you are talking about but with the 20d

I look at it this way yea it's to much camera for my skill level but I look forward to getting better.

And I think I am

I also have an expensive guitar too way beyond my playing level but I am better now
because it's a more comfortable guitar to play ....so I play it more.
I've seem your shots you will have it singing in no time

Give it time it's a great camera

Fred

luckyrwe

I was there too when going from the D100 to the D2H. Maybe the D100 is more forgiving and does not expect the shooter to be a Photoshop expert.

Harryb

There's a review of the D2x here http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html .


What I found interesting (besides it besting the Canon 1 DS Mk. II) in the summary were these conclusions:

"THe D2X is also the most unforgiving image recording instrument I've ever used. If there is any optical flaw or aberration of the image projected by your lens the D2X will show the defect with merciless clarity........ If you rely on sloppy or haphazard shooting techniques the D2X will teach you a lesson you'll not likely to forget".

4labs

Harryb wrote:

There's a review of the D2x here http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html .


What I found interesting (besides it besting the Canon 1 DS Mk. II) in the summary were these conclusions:

"THe D2X is also the most unforgiving image recording instrument I've ever used. If there is any optical flaw or aberration of the image projected by your lens the D2X will show the defect with merciless clarity........ If you rely on sloppy or haphazard shooting techniques the D2X will teach you a lesson you'll not likely to forget".

I read that review after I ordered the camera and had contemplated canceling it but I am just going to have to learn how to use it and how to process better.

4labs

Matthew Saville wrote:

For sharpening, try turning the radius way down (into the decimal places) and the power / intensity way up (past 200-300). That I have found is what works best with the D2x images I've been able to get my grubby, un-worthy hands on... But yeah, you'd be surprised at what R 0.2/0.3 and Intensity 400-500 can do! Give that a try...

And yes, when you try to pull 12 megapixels out of a 1.5x cropped sensor, you have to be using the best glass possible, otherwise you're just throwing away resolution. And even the old 35mm glass, at least on the wide end, isn't going to cut it if you're trying to push the envelope and print 24x36" etc etc... Gotta be DX glass. I've shot with the legendary 17-35 f/2.8 and even with 6 megapixels on my D70, I can see that the extreme edges really suffer when I'm at 17mm.

Congrats on the D2x, and happy shooting! Post an image or two or link us to where you've posted them?

Thanks,
-matt-

Thnxs Matthew I have the 17-35mm f/2.8 but haven't used it yet. I will definately have it with me at Yosemite.
My main lens is the 70-200mm f/2.8 I haven't shot much of anything except the pups yet but I will shortly.

4labs

USAIR wrote:

Just my 2 cents

I also have the same problem you are talking about but with the 20d

I look at it this way yea it's to much camera for my skill level but I look forward to getting better.

And I think I am

I also have an expensive guitar too way beyond my playing level but I am better now
because it's a more comfortable guitar to play ....so I play it more.
I've seem your shots you will have it singing in no time

Give it time it's a great camera

Fred

Thnxs Fred I am in no hurry eventually I'll get it to sing I am sure, especially with the amount of time I spend on here. I learn something everyday.

Deacon

Whew, this is almost work!
Got mine a couple of days ago. I am amazed at the sharpness and clarity of the sensor. Better range of colors and more accurate representation. Here are a couple of shots from a photo class I am taking. I am taking classes from an instructor I took photojournalism from in college in 72-75. Here 30 years later he is teaching at a community college close by and I had to spend some more time with him. He is one of the best instructors I ever had and being able to spend more time with him is wonderful!


David Falconer, chief photo editor for the Oregonian, National Geographic, Sunset and many other publications.


Today we had to shoot our classmates using a camera in the photo.




Some umbrella shots....








Deacon

4labs

Deacon would you mind sharing your some exif and what post processing if any was done?

Deacon

tell me how...
4labs, never done that so can you tell me now to attach the exif data? I applied sharpening in the smugmug uploader.

Deacon

Matthew Saville

"THe D2X is also the most unforgiving image recording instrument I've ever used. If there is any optical flaw or aberration of the image projected by your lens the D2X will show the defect with merciless clarity........ If you rely on sloppy or haphazard shooting techniques the D2X will teach you a lesson you'll not likely to forget".

This sounds suspiciosly akin to the way they say Velvia and other pro transparency films are un-forgiving. Perhaps Nikon is on to something then?

-matt-

4labs

Ok after today I am feeling a bit better about the camera. These pictures were taken with very little pp, a little USm in Nikon Capture(thnxs Harry). The Auto White Balance seems to work perfectly when the sun is out but not so much when it is cloudy which is much different than I found with the D100.





I think this last one is right out of the camera.

Mitchell

Todays pics are stunning!!


I am watching you with great interest. Please continue to share your experience with this camera. Tell us more about your thoughts on the camera itself. I am sitting here with my one year old D70 and drooling. Please tell me they included Nikon Capture with this $5,000 camera.:photo

mitch

JohnR

Mitchell wrote:

Todays pics are stunning!!
Please tell me they included Nikon Capture with this $5,000 camera.:photo

mitch

You are kidding...right?!

Mitchell

One year later, I am still smarting over the $100 price tag for Nikon Capture after spending $1300 on the camera and lens. Don't get me wrong, I'm not cheap when it comes to this stuff, but I hate getting nickle and dimed by what I always felt was a quality company.


Seriously, not including a $100 program with a $5,000 camera? Just a bad PR decision in my book.

mitch

Harryb

Mitchell wrote:

One year later, I am still smarting over the $100 price tag for Nikon Capture after spending $1300 on the camera and lens. Don't get me wrong, I'm not cheap when it comes to this stuff, but I hate getting nickle and dimed by what I always felt was a quality company.


Seriously, not including a $100 program with a $5,000 camera? Just a bad PR decision in my book.

mitch

Hey Mitch,

It always ticked me off too. Fortunately its a great program but still its like they are trying to squeeze that last piece of $ out of you.

4labs

Mitchell wrote:

One year later, I am still smarting over the $100 price tag for Nikon Capture after spending $1300 on the camera and lens. Don't get me wrong, I'm not cheap when it comes to this stuff, but I hate getting nickle and dimed by what I always felt was a quality company.


Seriously, not including a $100 program with a $5,000 camera? Just a bad PR decision in my book.

mitch

Besides the 100 bucks here are a few more things that you need to consider. You probably will need to upgrade your computer because of the size of the files, processing them will be very slow otherwise, I had to but a 2GIG compact flash card to shoot Raw, I bought the Nikon Cool Walker for when I am traveling and need to transfer files from the camera, and last but not least you need good lenses to get the most out of the camera. Someone alot smarter than me can explain the pixel math. So far as anyone can tell by my pictures there was no reason for me to get the camera given my ability but I am turning 40 and wanted it. The D100 would have suited my needs just fine.

luckyrwe

The D100 was just as lacking, you need the AC adapter to clean the CCD, and that is extra. There used to be a time you worried about unscrupulous dealers stripping the camera kits bare. Now the manufacturers are beating them to it!

Mitchell

4labs wrote:

Besides the 100 bucks here are a few more things that you need to consider. You probably will need to upgrade your computer because of the size of the files, processing them will be very slow otherwise, I had to but a 2GIG compact flash card to shoot Raw, I bought the Nikon Cool Walker for when I am traveling and need to transfer files from the camera, and last but not least you need good lenses to get the most out of the camera. Someone alot smarter than me can explain the pixel math. So far as anyone can tell by my pictures there was no reason for me to get the camera given my ability but I am turning 40 and wanted it. The D100 would have suited my needs just fine.

Wait a minute! I just turned 40 and all I got was a lousy card. I'm ordering a D2X now!!

mitch