More from last Saturday
This is pretty much it. I have been careful, I hope, to only use ones that are in focus and not blown. Comments, etc appreciated. The backlit one of the GBH in his nest is a different one, and I don't think it is soft. If I have accidentally already shown you any of these, I am sorry. g
Anything I did to one, I can do to the other. I took about 5 or 6 shots here, maybe more. But remember everyone said that the others were too busy. These I thought were simpler. I saturated it more. I could mess with it. Maybe the top of the tree should be in it. This one doesn't have a top.
g
Anything I did to one, I can do to the other. I took about 5 or 6 shots here, maybe more. But remember everyone said that the others were too busy. These I thought were simpler. I saturated it more. I could mess with it. Maybe the top of the tree should be in it. This one doesn't have a top.
g
After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
0
Comments
Cincinnati Smug Leader
ginger
I really like image three! One thing I find myself overdoing is trying to get the tightest possible crop on a subject. What I end up missing though, is the "big picture" or total story surrounding the subject. Thanks for reminding me look beyond the main subject for the whole story. Well done!!
Kirwin
I like #1 and #3, the lighting here and OOF background at some depth/dimension to the over all images. Especially #1 the bird and tree look real and 3D, this I think is allways good
Good work
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Good exposure on that egrte shot. You caught some good feather detail in the shot which ain't easy to do.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"