300mm f/4 first shots

dlplumerdlplumer Registered Users Posts: 8,081 Major grins
edited June 4, 2008 in Wildlife
Shot at f/4. I think it would have been sharper stopped down:scratch

web.jpg

web.jpg

web.jpg

Candid feedback appreciated :D

Thanks

Comments

  • jonh68jonh68 Registered Users Posts: 2,711 Major grins
    edited June 3, 2008
    It looks to me the focus is slightly offheadscratch.gif It should be sharper than that unless you cropped severely. I usually use my 300 f4 at f4 and get sharper images. Do you have any test shots besides wildlife in a more controlled environment? These are not bad, just not sharp as you would expect a prime to be.
  • GiphsubGiphsub Registered Users Posts: 2,662 Major grins
    edited June 4, 2008
    I like that 3rd shot. The first shot looks to me like it is front focused on the branch just to the left of where the bird is perched.
  • Ric GrupeRic Grupe Registered Users Posts: 9,522 Major grins
    edited June 4, 2008
    You are going to like that lens. It even does well with the 1.4 extender.

    I found f/5.6 without and f/6.3 with the extender were optimal for birding. Remember you are dealing with a very shallow depth of field and small subjects...so that focus point needs to be right on the head.

    Don't be afraid to up the iso to keep your shutter speeds at least at 1/250...or 1/400 with the extender.

    That lens is very capable of great things. deal.gif
  • dlplumerdlplumer Registered Users Posts: 8,081 Major grins
    edited June 4, 2008
    Thank you
    Thank you guys. I realized afterwards that I should have stopped it down a bit and that my dof was too shallow. I appreciate your coaching, and I will heed your advice. Much appreciated. thumb.gif
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited June 4, 2008
    What's the exif data on those captures? The lack of sharpness could be DOF or camera shake.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • dlplumerdlplumer Registered Users Posts: 8,081 Major grins
    edited June 4, 2008
    Harryb wrote:
    What's the exif data on those captures? The lack of sharpness could be DOF or camera shake.

    It's dof at f/4. I had it on a tripod. Better stuff to come. Thanks much Harry :D:D
Sign In or Register to comment.