Options

Happy 1st Anniversary, GF!

NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
edited September 23, 2009 in Go Figure
A year ago a new forum made sail from a safe harbour of a general People forum into the dangerous waters of figure studies, artistic nudity and other NSFW content. Over this year the GF crew wandered, lusted, posted and critiqued numerous attempts worthy of its name and goals.
I would like to celebrate this anniversary :clap by saying thank you for those who conceived this new forum, those who participated in it and of course those who steered it. :bow

And I also have a question: is it possible to replace the premoderation with post moderation? I mean, we aready have password protected opt-in option, the images posted thus far did not suffer form sensless adultness of the xxx-rated porn sites, all in all it looks we can manage to keep these waters hustlers-free. Yet the existing pre-moderation rule surely imposes a certain lag, adversly affecting the forum dynamics. :cry
My suggestion is: let it be post-moderated, like the rest of the dgrin is, at least on a probational basis. Should we realize it opens the doors to the good-for-nothing dirt-only-seeking pirahnas - we'll get back to the existing status quo. Otherwsie, we, the usual crowd, will try to keep it as clean and artistic as it was thus far - without the need of the Big Man approval for each comment or post...

What say you?
"May the f/stop be with you!"

Comments

  • Options
    AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 13, 2009
    Nik, you're lagged - this has been done for minutes already! lol3.gif
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,929 moderator
    edited September 14, 2009
    Andy wrote:
    Nik, you're lagged - this has been done for minutes already! lol3.gif

    Hmm....these posts still showed as pending approval. I think there's still a one where a zero ought to be. But I agree that there's no need for pre-approval, and we'll get it sorted out soon.
  • Options
    NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2009
    Great anniversary gift guys, thank you! clap.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,929 moderator
    edited September 14, 2009
    Nikolai wrote:
    Great anniversary gift guys, thank you! clap.gif

    Oh, and it seems to working right now.

    Now behave yourself, Nik. lol3.gif
  • Options
    NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2009
    Richard wrote:
    Oh, and it seems to working right now.

    Now behave yourself, Nik. lol3.gif
    I swear on the soon-to-be-mine 7D body! rolleyes1.gif
    And thanks again, guys, sure appreciate your trust! thumb.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Options
    JohnBiggsJohnBiggs Registered Users Posts: 841 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2009
    Such great news. It always annoyed me to post replies here.
    Canon Gear: 5D MkII, 30D, 85 1.2 L, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 17-40mm f4 L, 50 1.4, 580EX, 2x 580EXII, Canon 1.4x TC, 300 f4 IS L, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 100-400 IS L
    Other Gear: Olympus E-PL1, Pan 20 1.7, Fuji 3D Camera, Lensbaby 2.0, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Alien Bees lighting, CyberSyncs, Domke, HONL, FlipIt.
    ~ Gear Pictures
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,929 moderator
    edited September 14, 2009
    JohnBiggs wrote:
    Such great news. It always annoyed me to post replies here.

    Yeah, it annoyed me, too, that I had to approve them. lol3.gif
  • Options
    JohnBiggsJohnBiggs Registered Users Posts: 841 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2009
    Richard wrote:
    Yeah, it annoyed me, too, that I had to approve them. lol3.gif

    Laughing.gif. Now I just hope everyone can remain civil so we can keep it this way.deal.gifdeal
    Canon Gear: 5D MkII, 30D, 85 1.2 L, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 17-40mm f4 L, 50 1.4, 580EX, 2x 580EXII, Canon 1.4x TC, 300 f4 IS L, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 100-400 IS L
    Other Gear: Olympus E-PL1, Pan 20 1.7, Fuji 3D Camera, Lensbaby 2.0, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Alien Bees lighting, CyberSyncs, Domke, HONL, FlipIt.
    ~ Gear Pictures
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,929 moderator
    edited September 14, 2009
    JohnBiggs wrote:
    Laughing.gif. Now I just hope everyone can remain civil so we can keep it this way.deal.gifdeal

    Yep, that's the deal. thumb.gif
  • Options
    Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2009
    JohnBiggs wrote:
    Such great news. It always annoyed me to post replies here.
    Happy 1st!!

    15524779-Ti.gif - The requirement for pre-approval has, in the past, caused me to take a pass on a number of occasions. This change is very much welcome!!
  • Options
    angevin1angevin1 Registered Users Posts: 3,403 Major grins
    edited September 23, 2009
    JohnBiggs wrote:
    Such great news. It always annoyed me to post replies here.


    ...or to post only to have them denied...
    tom wise
  • Options
    NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited September 23, 2009
    angevin1 wrote:
    ...or to post only to have them denied...
    Really? o_0 eek7.gif That's weird... Sorry to hear that... None of mine ever was...headscratch.gif Hopefully it was simply a matter of technicalities, not content-related..
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Options
    angevin1angevin1 Registered Users Posts: 3,403 Major grins
    edited September 23, 2009
    Nikolai wrote:
    Really? o_0 eek7.gif That's weird... Sorry to hear that... None of mine ever was...headscratch.gif Hopefully it was simply a matter of technicalities, not content-related..
    IMO Yours weren't because of your status (?) and true or no, appearance of favoritism, is for practicable purpose the same.

    ie: you could make a double entendre comment about some part of a model, and often, not at all tongue in cheek, yet a reply to this would be censured. The strange part to me wasn't really this stuff though. The strange part was that it was all good commentary; grade school perhaps, but in good fun, and not in the least derogatory.

    Of course, with a live human censor, this all becomes quite subjective.

    just the way I saw it then..times change...next~~
    tom wise
  • Options
    NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited September 23, 2009
    angevin1 wrote:
    IMO Yours weren't because of your status (?) and true or no, appearance of favoritism, is for practicable purpose the same.

    ie: you could make a double entendre comment about some part of a model, and often, not at all tongue in cheek, yet a reply to this would be censured. The strange part to me wasn't really this stuff though. The strange part was that it was all good commentary; grade school perhaps, but in good fun, and not in the least derogatory.

    Of course, with a live human censor, this all becomes quite subjective.

    just the way I saw it then..times change...next~~
    Well, I guess since it's a "special forum" we all need to be just a bit more careful with our comments, don't we? mwink.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
Sign In or Register to comment.