Not Quite There Yet III (R Rated) C&C

Comments

• Options

  Candid Arts Registered Users Posts: 1,685 Major grins

  March 23, 2011 edited March 23, 2011

  Similar things to #2. It seems a bit underexposed and blurry or OOF...

  Candid Arts Photography | Portland Oregon | Fine Art
  OneTwoFiftieth | Portland, Oregon | Modern Portraiture
  
  My Equipment:
  Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon EOS 1
  Lenses: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8
  Lighting: Canon 580EXII, Canon 420 EX, 12" Reflector, Pocket Wizard Plus II (3), AB800 (3), Large Softbox
  Stability: Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 Tripod, Manfrotto 488RC4 Ball Head, Manfrotto 679B Monopod

  0
• Options

  kdog Administrators Posts: 11,680 moderator

  March 23, 2011 edited March 23, 2011

  My thoughts too. You might be able to bring up the exposure in post a little. Maybe your monitor is set too bright. Cool shot otherwise.

  Moderator of Landscapes forum
  Link to my Smugmug site

  0
• Options

  Icebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins

  March 30, 2011 edited March 30, 2011

  Looks like old Kodacolor to me.

  John :
  Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
  D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.

  0
• Options

  eleganteye Registered Users Posts: 26 Big grins

  April 5, 2011 edited April 5, 2011

  I think there is some excessive JPG compression also making it look less sharp. Try maximum quality, especially at this size.

  Aaron
  my site (NSFW)

  0