Options

Macro Lens Advice?

DifferentSeedDifferentSeed Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
edited September 27, 2006 in Cameras
Hi,

I want a macro lens. I want one soooo bad. I've got a Sony Alpha (A100) and am learning the in's and out's of a camera that isn't a PBD (push button dummy)... :) I've done some research and reading about lenses, blah blah, and I think I've settled on a 100mm instead of 50mm, 85mm, or 105mm... which are all out there in various states of being with Maxxum mounts. I want to take closeups of everyday items and of things outside: flowers, bugs, you name it.

So my question is... is this a good choice for me?

The lens in particular I've settled on is a Konica Minolta 100mm f/2.8 (D). It works with the digital metering for the flash (I have a Minolta 3600D flash as well) so I'd like a macro that can work that too, that's why I'm looking at Minoltas).

Any feedback would be appreciated. It's a pricey bugger - $600! There's one on ebay at around 480, but with 2 days and 4 bids I think it'll come close to the new retail price :|

Thanks!
Make a small loan, Make a big difference. Find out how at http://www.kiva.org

Comments

  • Options
    ballentphotoballentphoto Registered Users Posts: 312 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2006
    Hi,

    I want a macro lens. I want one soooo bad. I've got a Sony Alpha (A100) and am learning the in's and out's of a camera that isn't a PBD (push button dummy)... :) I've done some research and reading about lenses, blah blah, and I think I've settled on a 100mm instead of 50mm, 85mm, or 105mm... which are all out there in various states of being with Maxxum mounts. I want to take closeups of everyday items and of things outside: flowers, bugs, you name it.

    So my question is... is this a good choice for me?

    The lens in particular I've settled on is a Konica Minolta 100mm f/2.8 (D). It works with the digital metering for the flash (I have a Minolta 3600D flash as well) so I'd like a macro that can work that too, that's why I'm looking at Minoltas).

    Any feedback would be appreciated. It's a pricey bugger - $600! There's one on ebay at around 480, but with 2 days and 4 bids I think it'll come close to the new retail price :|

    Thanks!

    All I can suggest is if the price is already at $480 with 2 days to go, you may as well buy a brand new one from a reputable company... I do not know if KM/Sony will be as picky as other companies regarding gray market equipment, but that is something you need to watch out for when on EBay. The used market for KM/Sony is not as ripe as Canon/Nikon is for deals. Good luck on your purchase. :D
    -Michael
    Just take the picture :):
    Pictures are at available at:http://www.ballentphoto.com

    My Blog: http://ballentphoto.blogspot.com
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,852 moderator
    edited September 21, 2006
    According to user reviews, it seems to be a good general purpose 100mm lens as well as macro, save for slower than normal focus.

    http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/reviews.asp?IDLens=97

    If you have to have the Minolta name, this looks like a great lens to have.

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    DifferentSeedDifferentSeed Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
    edited September 21, 2006
    Hi,

    I noticed the 2nd hand market isn't as rich with offers for minolta/sony as with other brands. I suppose there's some good and bad to that.

    I was thinking I'd buy it new as well, given I trust B&H and I don't know the ebay seller from adam (there are a few sellers I've bought lenses from before and they were great lenses and great vendors, but... not the case here).

    As for having to have minolta, ziggy, I don't. I just would rather get one that I know will work with the ADI flash metering, and that minolta (d) lens does, according to this chart:
    http://support.sony-europe.com/DIME/digistill/alpha/compatibility/lens.asp?l=en&m=DSLR-A100

    If there are alteratives that would work I'm game. As long as it's a good lens that will give me years of picture pleasure (man that sounded weird to type, but I don't edit myself!) then new, used, minolta, sigma, or borat of khazetstan imaging. Whatever works. I'm open to suggestions. :D

    *edit* Btw, thanks for that link, ziggy. Awesome resource!!! I just noticed those reviews are for the 100mm f2.8 macro, not the 100mm (D), which is at: http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=99 Ho hum... Decisions, decisions.
    Make a small loan, Make a big difference. Find out how at http://www.kiva.org
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,852 moderator
    edited September 22, 2006
    The Sigma 105mm, f2.8 Macro EX DG gets great reviews, and most of the EX lenses do have distance sensors, but Dyxum does not show 3rd party lenses as having "D type" capabilities.

    Still, the lens gets good reviews at Dyxum, with focus speed and build about the only problems which the reviewers deduct points for. Then again, reviewers talk about the Minolta 100mm, f2.8 macro being slow, but don't detract any points, so I'm not sure that a comparable standard is being employed. (Slow AF is a fairly typical complaint of most true macro lenses, regardless of manufacture.)

    http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/reviews.asp?IDLens=156

    In order for ADI to work properly, the lens has to relay distance information, that's the only difference I can see between the "D type" lenses and older designs. I can tell you that the Sigma 18-50mm, f2.8 EX DG that I have does relay distance information to my Canon XT, but Dyxum says that lens for the Minolta mount is not a "D type" lens. Either Sigma choose not to include that feature for the Minolta mount, or the reviewers have not tested for it, it's hard to say.

    Sigma4Less.com has an excellent return policy (that I have tested twice) and they have the Minolta mount Sigma 105mm, f2.8 Macro EX DG in stock for $360USD. That's enough of a savings that I would suggest a test, but it's your money and that Minolta 100mm macro is a sure thing.

    http://www.sigma4less.com/sess/utn;jsessionid=154513514e2df68/shopdata/0020_Lenses/0020_Fixed+Focal+Length/0010_Macro/product_details.shopscript?article=0310_Sigma%2BTelephoto%2B105mm%2Bf%3D26slash%3D3B2%3D252E8%2BEX%2BDG%2BMacro%2BAutofocus%2BLens%2Bfor%2BKonica-Minolta%2BMaxxum%2B%3D28SG105F28DMI%3D29

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    DifferentSeedDifferentSeed Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
    edited September 22, 2006
    ziggy53 wrote:
    Still, the lens gets good reviews at Dyxum, with focus speed and build about the only problems which the reviewers deduct points for. Then again, reviewers talk about the Minolta 100mm, f2.8 macro being slow, but don't detract any points, so I'm not sure that a comparable standard is being employed. (Slow AF is a fairly typical complaint of most true macro lenses, regardless of manufacture.)
    There actually 6 reviews for the D model, with no points lost at all in any of the review. It scores a 5/5 after six reviews. Only one of the reviewers has the non-D model to compare it too, and if memory serves none compare it to similar Sigma's. The reviews are here: http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/reviews.asp?IDLens=99
    ziggy53 wrote:
    In order for ADI to work properly, the lens has to relay distance information, that's the only difference I can see between the "D type" lenses and older designs. I can tell you that the Sigma 18-50mm, f2.8 EX DG that I have does relay distance information to my Canon XT, but Dyxum says that lens for the Minolta mount is not a "D type" lens. Either Sigma choose not to include that feature for the Minolta mount, or the reviewers have not tested for it, it's hard to say.
    I am not sure what the difference would be with the Sigma EX DGs and Minolta Ds, if any. Hopefully I'll come across something to try it with in some second hand or pawn shop (and have my camera with me) and then I may just try it out on the spot to see what happens and if there's any difference or if it works as the Minolta D's do. I have another Sigma and that seems to work fine (dont' know the particulars of the lens as I type this).
    ziggy53 wrote:
    Sigma4Less.com has an excellent return policy (that I have tested twice) and they have the Minolta mount Sigma 105mm, f2.8 Macro EX DG in stock for $360USD. That's enough of a savings that I would suggest a test, but it's your money and that Minolta 100mm macro is a sure thing.
    Another website to keep when shopping! Thanks! thumb.gif

    As it stands I went ahead and ordered the Minolta version new from B&H when I saw the Ebay auction one reached $550 (more than new at B&H!) with 36+ hours to go. Given the sudden demand for new Minolta lenses (of which I am guilty of contributing to!) and the increase in prices, decrease in availability, and that I just want it I figured I'd bite the bullet... Though I did have to promise my husband that I wouldn't buy any more lenses 'til at least Christmas, or November anyway... I didn't say anything about other accessories tho rolleyes1.gif
    Make a small loan, Make a big difference. Find out how at http://www.kiva.org
  • Options
    DifferentSeedDifferentSeed Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    Well... the macro lens came today! Oh my how pretty it is... wings.gif

    I cannot believe I didn't get this right from the start. I love it! I've only snapped a few shots of things in the immediate vicinity but wow. Just so much fun! It's great to be able to focus on things soooo close! I'll post some for some criticism and review and all that in a while. :D

    And it works great with the A100 if anyone else is considering one!
    Make a small loan, Make a big difference. Find out how at http://www.kiva.org
Sign In or Register to comment.