Options

Canon 10-22mm -what do you think about ?

ArnicaArnica Registered Users Posts: 171 Major grins
edited April 26, 2007 in Cameras
I'm considering a purchase Canon 10-22mm f/ 3,5-4,5 USM. :dunno
Does anybody have experience with this lens ?

Comments

  • Options
    Travis IngleTravis Ingle Registered Users Posts: 29 Big grins
    edited April 24, 2007
    I've had it for a while now and love it. I can't wait to get over to the coast this summer and play around with it.

    Here are a couple of my favorites from this lens:

    mapped3.jpg

    IMG_3373copy.jpg

    LakeC.jpg
  • Options
    controldcontrold Registered Users Posts: 146 Major grins
    edited April 24, 2007
    I'm a big fan as well - really lets you put perspective on shots and shoot in tight quarters. Here is one of my more recent captures:

    145642089-M.jpg

    - Mike
    http://mikeapted.smugmug.com/

    Canon 30D | 10D
    Canon 10-22 | 28-135 f3.5-5.6 | 70-200 f4L | 100-400 f4-5.6L
    Canon Speedlight 580EX
    Kenko Extension Tubes
  • Options
    AiredrifterAiredrifter Registered Users Posts: 253 Major grins
    edited April 24, 2007
    Interesting perspectives are possible.
    134852821-L.jpg
  • Options
    kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited April 24, 2007
    I have fun taking pictures of my kids in exotic settings with this lens.

    IMG_2920_1024.jpg

    IMG_8709.jpg

    It really is a fun lens.

    -joel
  • Options
    AiredrifterAiredrifter Registered Users Posts: 253 Major grins
    edited April 24, 2007
  • Options
    ArnicaArnica Registered Users Posts: 171 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    Thanx Guys,
    The sharpness in the picture are super. Its well worth the money. nod.gif
  • Options
    claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    Don't own it, but I have used it. Optics as you see are excellent. I don't care for the build--it strongly reminds me of the kit lens or 50/1.8 Mk II--shameful for a $600 lens. Another good option to look into is the Tokina 12-24/4--similar optical performance, build more reminiscent of an "L" lense, and $150-200 less expensive. Of course one differnece is the 12mm wide end vs 10mm--some think it ciritcal & huge others (myself included) don't.

    Either way you will have an excellent UWA zoom.
  • Options
    Mike02Mike02 Registered Users Posts: 321 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    "What do you think about it?"

    I wish they made it for Nikon :P.
    "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it."
    - Ansel Adams.
  • Options
    PindyPindy Registered Users Posts: 1,089 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    I think it's one of my faves.

    144075027-L.jpg
  • Options
    ArnicaArnica Registered Users Posts: 171 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    wow ! Your photos bring a strong appetite for this lens. :)
    Can't wait to get it !
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
Sign In or Register to comment.