Dead Horse point, UT (Shootout '08)
ivar
Registered Users Posts: 8,395 Major grins
One very early morning, a group of photographers decided to drive up to Dead Horse point.
At that very location, I shot this shot:
I like the shot, but think it may be missing something. I may also just have to get used to it, as it's not what I'm used to as far as shooting as well as processing. What do you think?
At that very location, I shot this shot:
I like the shot, but think it may be missing something. I may also just have to get used to it, as it's not what I'm used to as far as shooting as well as processing. What do you think?
0
Comments
James
Langford Photography
http://www.langfordphotography.com
james@langfordphotography.com
Well Done, Shane
That's me yelling praise down the canyon. I'm sure it would echo quite a ways.
I can see how you might want a dead tree or something in the fg but while that's good and gives a very solid subject to anchor you, I kind of like the space and just the use of light that draws your eye down the center. Don't change a thing. The light/shadow as it is makes me feel like I'm slipping down to the bottom. Tension!
Fantastic balance of light in the sky and on the land!
(Do we have enough gas to get back to town? )
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
It's a little bright for my taste. Especially the rocks on the right and the bottom of the valley. I'd like a bit more mystery in it. But the mix of light in the shot is very nice!
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
The only little nit I might pick with you is that the very top of the clouds look a little too dark to be real. I might try lightening them up just a little, while keeping the darkness for the "framing" or vignette effect you have going on.
Is that someone's shadow on the extreme right?
http://www.twitter.com/deegolden
I do have some wide shots from the same area, also, but they don't do anything for me, really
I do really like the foreground myself, and I think that's what is missing in the wider shots.
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
Thanks Schmoo, for the great compliment; I do feel like I'm missing something, but on the other hand I can't imagine a tree being in the foreground and still have the same sight down the canyonland for some reason
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
I used a canon 10-22 on a canon 30d. I love that lens
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
It was captured one very early morning, with a 10-22 on a Canon 30d.
There are actually 2 exposures with a 1-stop difference, blended in PhotoMatix and further processed in LR.
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
I'm going to try a different version of this shot in processing, using Dee's comments as well (see above/below). I'll post a different version here if I have something to my liking
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
The sky was actually darkened a bit with the Grad-ND tool in LR, so that may be an easy fix.
I'll see if I can process it a different way, with a bit lighter sky, and see what I can come up with.
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
My Gallery
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
Nikkor 18-70mm
Nikkor 70-300mm
My Gallery
Ahh! The joy of not much of anything.............
My guess is midday would have been a better time (with a CP?)
Rags
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
I'm definitely not looking for more pop; this is about as poppy as I'm willing to go already. I'm more looking for something to anchor the foreground a little more, i think.
I doubt midday would be better; For one there would be much more, and harsher, shadows. But also, this was shot at 10mm, near impossible to use a CP with.
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug