Search
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
It depends upon how large you want the page load to be. The math says that 10 1600px images at 2:3 aspect ratio would be 10 x 1600 x 1066 = 17,066,660 whereas 20 982px images at the same 2:3 aspect ratio would be 20 x 982 x 654 = 12,844,560. So Smugmug's 10 are already significantly larger than The Frame's 20. -
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
-
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
Haha Darryl, you make it like we've not thought about this at all See my comment above please. We'd love to give more flexibility - but it comes at a huge cost (sorcery, testing, themes, more...) and so I'm happy with 10 right now. Thanks for posting your thoughts, we really love to hear them, we do. -
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
One of the bummers we're struggling with is when the images get large, the subscriber is more likely to right-click-protect their images. When they do, you have to wait for the entire image to render before it displays, and the user (not the subscriber) hates that and the abandonment rate on the gallery goes way up. That… -
Re: Journal and Slideshow extreme makeovers
That's my point - how large I, as a paying subscriber, want the page load to be. Giving me a user parameter I can set (with an upper limit, obviously) would be one approach. But what I'm suggesting is simply that the 10 image limit could be reviewed. This new style is great but it is a "journal" style, after all, and we're…
14 results