Search
-
Re: 6pm
-
Re: 6pm
-
Re: 6pm
You see, that's what I'm saying. You don't know. If they all were 99%, that would mean they are just bright yellow. But they are 100%, it can be because they are 100% - or maybe they are 150%, but a gallon jug can only hold a gallon of liquid, even if you pour a whole Atlantic ocean into it. Clear as mud? -
Re: 6pm
-
Re: 6pm
Nik, you are now blinding me - with this jargon! It's only jargon, because I cannot see a problem. I can see the shadows on the skins and the lines of the skin pattern and the blemishes. Is your gamma correct? Is your display too bright? I can see that Y is at 100% over most of this fruit, but Y not? Y is also 100% on the… -
Re: 6pm
I do find the saturated colors a bit jarring from a personal-aesthetics perspective, but believe they reflect the reality of the scene. I'm having some trouble understanding why you (Nik) think that canary melons shouldn't be 100% yellow. They're not honeydews or cantaloupes; see the shape. In the real world, they are in… -
Re: 6pm
"Each file has 10 channels" (Dan Margoulis) Open your file in PS, bring the Info panel up and watch CMYK section as you hover over the melons. Y (Yellow) will pretty much stay at 100% the whole time. Which is a tell-tell sign of an oversaturation, i.e. you probaly already lost some details (unless you shot RAW and can… -
Re: 6pm
Neil, while I can assure you that I'm using a good color calbrated monitor, I know better than to trust my old blind eyes when making color-related comments. I used the hard cold numbers. And in my book 100% on any channel over the large area of image which also happens to be its primary foreground subject is called… -
Re: 6pm
Nik, this is very interesting. It's the first time I have seen the Y channel like this. How do you get it? I can get a yellow channel which is the negative of what you show here, and yes there is no detail in those melons there. However, in the "real" image at 100% I can see perfectly natural detail. I even count about a…
9 results