Search
-
Under exposed was better in bright sun w/shadow @ ISO 50
-
Re: Under exposed was better in bright sun w/shadow @ ISO 50
-
Re: Under exposed was better in bright sun w/shadow @ ISO 50
No, you just need to stop using ISO 50. The "expanded" ISO levels are just being faked in software anyway. ISO 50 is basically just ISO 100 overexposed by one stop. I suppose if you have the camera make JPEGs for you (which I have never done with the 5D2), it probably compensates, but for RAW shooting the expanded modes… -
Re: Under exposed was better in bright sun w/shadow @ ISO 50
Interesting, Jay, that you said you had to under expose three stops for this image. From the exif data encoded in your image of the rooster, I find - ISO 50, f9.0 1/125th sec as you said. I KNOW from the [url="http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=30235 "]sunny 16 rule[/url] that for an ISO of 50, a normal subject in… -
Re: Under exposed was better in bright sun w/shadow @ ISO 50
Neil, I am guilty, as charged. But I have not been name calling - that is what prompted my concerns, and why I felt I had to step in. I like both you fellows, and think you both offer good points. If you wish to continue the discussion with craigd in a new thread, I am fine with that, as long as it remains civil. But no…
5 results