Search
-
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
-
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
-
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
Bummer. I was hoping the 50/1.2L would be sharper than the 50/1.4 but it doesn't look like that is the case. Canon has posted the MTF charts and they confirm your results: there isn't much difference in sharpness between the 50/1.4 and the 50/1.2L either wide open or at f/8. I was hoping for a lens that would be in the… -
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
Hahahahaha my memory is garbage. I very vividly remembered that thread as me saying bokeh is the quality of the out of focus areas and you telling me that it had to have points of light. I didn't want to drag up that thread because I didn't want to show that you were contradicting yourself. Hahahahaha I'm an idiot.… -
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
Not much, IMO. You'll get 1/3 stop (or 1/2, depending on your point of reference), which means you can shoot at ISO 1250 instead of 1600 maybe. But with today's great high-ISO performance, does it really matter? Is that worth $1300? To some, sure, I suppose. To the majority of us, no, I don't think so. It'll give you a bit… -
Re: Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
Well after all the reading of forums tests etc, I decided to bite the bullet so to speak and purchase the 50mm 1.2L All I can say that it is a superb lens to use, the biggest difference is not so much the sharpness, but the gorgeous tones, colour, contrast and feel it gives especially under 2.8 oh and the Bokeh is so… -
Review: Canon 50mm f/1.2L
I received my 50 f/1.2L yesterday, from my good friends at Tallyn's. Review Here. This lens had been rumored since May of 2005. Canon finally began shipping to dealers this week. I'd shot with one about a month ago, but it was a CPS lens, and so I made no review observations from that copy. Size, Weight, Feel, Build. It's…
7 results