Point & Shoots Suck.

2»

Comments

  • ArvanArvan Registered Users Posts: 888 Major grins
    edited September 19, 2008
    Good shots people! I can now not motivate myself NOT to get a lumix LX-3...It´s smaller then the G10, got bigger aparture lens..16:9 format allso raw ( which is a must ) it´s just so darn fantastic...and it´s good looking to =)

    Soon in a pocket near me :D:D
  • pemmettpemmett Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
    edited September 19, 2008
    It's not the size that matters...Using a compact camera creatively
    Sony W170

    345689786_bPbqA-XL-1.jpg

    345688461_vGqAx-XL-1.jpg

    345693082_XWJpw-XL-1.jpg

    372013003_AsFx4-XL.jpg

    359428144_K4xmK-XL.jpg

    345727526_FLLpq-XL-1.jpg

    I even put together an online called "It's not the size that matters...Using a compact camera creatively - A free online photography course for people wanting to improve their photos"
    "Take a moment to capture a memory that will last forever"
    My images | My blog | My free course
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 19, 2008
    Andy wrote:
    362252489_AYG3q-Th.jpg
    This one sucks so bad I made 1" foam-mounted backed print from the new lab we're hoping to work with and shipped it to ya :D
    362527732_kNsK5-Th.jpg
    This one is printed in 24x36 Kodak Metallic here, and hanging in my studio. It's freaking GORGEOUS.
  • Moogle PepperMoogle Pepper Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited September 19, 2008
    Man!!! I knew Point and Shoots suck!!! Just look at how awesome those photographs.. I mean pictures are!
    Food & Culture.
    www.tednghiem.com
  • nobodynobody Registered Users Posts: 94 Big grins
    edited September 19, 2008
    Nice work, everyone. What I see in many of these is huge depth-of-field. Because P&S cameras are miniaturized compared to DSLR's, that gives them a huge advantage in terms of depth-of-field. As an exemple, with my powershot 3IS at maximum zoom, and a focal length of 50 mm (or possibly 75) I can stand in a spot and compose roughly the same image as I get with my XTi at 200 mm.

    I believe that is the reason we see so many great landscape shots in this post. The disadvantage of a P&S is it's slow speed. That's why we don't see many action shots here.
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,703 moderator
    edited September 22, 2008
    Ethan, one does not use a sledge hammer to drive tacks. Nor does one dig a hole with a hammer.

    P&Ss do have great depth of field, that makes them good for macros and landscapes, of course.

    For a shallower DOF, a full frame DSLR will offer more control of DOF. Use a tool for what it excels atthumb.gif
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,934 moderator
    edited September 22, 2008
    pathfinder wrote:
    Nor does one dig a hole with a hammer.

    You were never a carpenter :D
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • neuronneuron Registered Users Posts: 30 Big grins
    edited September 22, 2008
    Nice thread !
    Hi,

    thanks for this toppic. I restricted myself from buying DSLR untill I'll shoot 1000 nice (to me) photographs with my trustworthy S2 IS. Just to learn a bit first. Currently I have 100 of them + 100 waiting for processing. So it's another ~6 years before I can buy another camera :)
  • swintonphotoswintonphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,664 Major grins
    edited September 22, 2008
  • CuongCuong Registered Users Posts: 1,508 Major grins
    edited September 22, 2008
    P&Ss also suck at shooting things that fly, swim, and prowl in the dark.

    309023630_tDBxc-L.jpg


    309023829_vt83w-L.jpg

    309024772_Hqej2-L.jpg

    Cuong
    "She Was a Little Taste of Heaven – And a One-Way Ticket to Hell!" - Max Phillips
Sign In or Register to comment.