Beautiful shot. Great foreground detail and color. I'm not sure if it's my monitor but the right side seems a little hot. But again, that could be my monitor.
Beautiful shot. Great foreground detail and color. I'm not sure if it's my monitor but the right side seems a little hot. But again, that could be my monitor.
Thanks, Tom. Right side of the sky is way hot. Is that what you're seeing? That was about the best I could control it being closer to the sun and all. Is that what you're seeing, or is the foreground hot too?
A lot of nice elements here but I find myself distracted by a fisheye effect that's happening in the foreground. My other nit would be that I would have preferred a little more breathing room just right of the sun.
A lot of nice elements here but I find myself distracted by a fisheye effect that's happening in the foreground. My other nit would be that I would have preferred a little more breathing room just right of the sun.
Nice balancing on the exposure.
Thanks, Steve. I'm really not seeing any fisheye in the foreground.
Awesome shot. Pretty well controlled exposure I'd say for how bright that sun seems to be. Better than I could have done I'm guessing I think the "fisheye" effect is just a function of the pano and the fact that the rocks curve up on either side. Either way, awesome image.
Could just be natural but if you follow the edge of the cliff in the FG, it takes on a u shape. It's most pronounced on the right side.
I believe that the terrain actually looked like that, but I wouldn't swear to it. It's a crazy undulating place where I was standing. Now I don't use a nodal slide and it's possible there is some foreground distortion, but it seems to me that the distortion would be centered, and not shifted to the right. But, I'm open to the possibility.
Thanks, Tom. Right side of the sky is way hot. Is that what you're seeing? That was about the best I could control it being closer to the sun and all. Is that what you're seeing, or is the foreground hot too?
Yes, it's the sky not the foreground. The foreground is great.
I do like the area of the sun blazed like that once in awhile...This image seems to call for it...
Timing of course is perfect....and the light is sweet.
Nodel slider may have made less distortion, but based on the nature of the FG who can really tell.... but I do see what Scole is say'n, but I think it's more natural than an abnormal parallax issue (but there is some)...
I'm sure at 100% we would find more issues:D
reagrding "fisheye" how does one notice distortion in shot that doesn't have any straight lines or "regular" shapes that we might discern as "distorted"?
reagrding "fisheye" how does one notice distortion in shot that doesn't have any straight lines or "regular" shapes that we might discern as "distorted"?
who are you asking? my thought is the term "fisheye" is being used loosely... I think the effect of the FG having the appearance as if we are looking straight down on it is the effect we are all talking about...
how the FG merges together with stitching also gives a "look" when not using pano gear... so how you can tell here? I dont think anyone but the person looking at the orininal frames will see the distortion. But the effect is there and most people will not think twice about it...
Awesome shot. Pretty well controlled exposure I'd say for how bright that sun seems to be. Better than I could have done I'm guessing I think the "fisheye" effect is just a function of the pano and the fact that the rocks curve up on either side. Either way, awesome image.
I do like the area of the sun blazed like that once in awhile...This image seems to call for it...
Timing of course is perfect....and the light is sweet.
Nodel slider may have made less distortion, but based on the nature of the FG who can really tell.... but I do see what Scole is say'n, but I think it's more natural than an abnormal parallax issue (but there is some)...
I'm sure at 100% we would find more issues:D
my nit: black specks in the upper left corner....
Thanks, Aaron! I'll have you explain all that to me in person some time. I'll go looking for those black specs now.
reagrding "fisheye" how does one notice distortion in shot that doesn't have any straight lines or "regular" shapes that we might discern as "distorted"?
Thanks so much, Qarik. I'm with you on the fish eye. It's extremely hard to tell.
I'm not sure I see all the "nits" described above. I do see some curve in the rocks but I thought it was just the rocks! I love this shot, Joel--great color contrast and the sun works well for me. Great texture in the rocks and a wonderful mood. Makes me want to sit and be quiet and just enjoy the view.
Lauren
"But ask the animals, and they will teach you." (Job 12:7)
Oops -- I added my comment before seeing the revision. I do see the difference in the sun and must say I like the second one better, but not by much. I just think it's a wonderful shot either way!
"But ask the animals, and they will teach you." (Job 12:7)
Wow I like this A LOT! looks like your WB may be off just a bit in a couple photos on the sun side they are not quite as warm. Stunning image either way!
Wow I like this A LOT! looks like your WB may be off just a bit in a couple photos on the sun side they are not quite as warm. Stunning image either way!
Thanks, CJ! 21 RAW frames in that shot, all batch processed at all phases with no chance of variability in white balance. I think what you must be seeing is a natural color gradient across the sky.
Thanks, CJ! 21 RAW frames in that shot, all batch processed at all phases with no chance of variability in white balance. I think what you must be seeing is a natural color gradient across the sky.
Comments
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
Link to my Smugmug site
Nice balancing on the exposure.
Blog: http://blog.scolephoto.com
Thanks, Steve. I'm really not seeing any fisheye in the foreground.
Link to my Smugmug site
Blog: http://blog.scolephoto.com
http://nikonic1.smugmug.com/
Link to my Smugmug site
Yes, it's the sky not the foreground. The foreground is great.
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
I do like the area of the sun blazed like that once in awhile...This image seems to call for it...
Timing of course is perfect....and the light is sweet.
Nodel slider may have made less distortion, but based on the nature of the FG who can really tell.... but I do see what Scole is say'n, but I think it's more natural than an abnormal parallax issue (but there is some)...
I'm sure at 100% we would find more issues:D
my nit: black specks in the upper left corner....
reagrding "fisheye" how does one notice distortion in shot that doesn't have any straight lines or "regular" shapes that we might discern as "distorted"?
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
who are you asking? my thought is the term "fisheye" is being used loosely... I think the effect of the FG having the appearance as if we are looking straight down on it is the effect we are all talking about...
how the FG merges together with stitching also gives a "look" when not using pano gear... so how you can tell here? I dont think anyone but the person looking at the orininal frames will see the distortion. But the effect is there and most people will not think twice about it...
A lover of all things photography.
Olympus E-500
My Smugmug Gallery
http://bgarland.smugmug.com/
Thanks, Matt.
Thanks, Aaron! I'll have you explain all that to me in person some time. I'll go looking for those black specs now.
Hi Randy. Thanks for the compliment.
Thanks so much, Qarik. I'm with you on the fish eye. It's extremely hard to tell.
Hahaha, funny Natalie. Thanks, though. You've come a long way since joining this forum. We all have.
Thank you so much, Bob!
Link to my Smugmug site
Fall colors in Zion? (btw, I will buy a water filter before that trip, I will never carry water again:D)(well, if there is a river near by:D)
Link to my Smugmug site
www.andmanphotography.com
Facebook Fan Page
"Landscape photography is the supreme test of the photographer - and often the supreme disappointment." Ansel Adams
Ron
http://ront.smugmug.com/
Nikon D600, Nikon 85 f/1.8G, Nikon 24-120mm f/4, Nikon 70-300, Nikon SB-700, Canon S95
I agree with Aaron, that sun is blown out, but so what?! It looks "right." So just let it be blown out.
SmugMug QA
My Photos
Thanks, Ron!
Thanks, Chris. You guys were right, there are a few blown pixels there. Here it is without any blown pixels and indeed looks much better.
New
Old for comparison
Thanks for the input!
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
Lauren
Lauren Blackwell
www.redleashphoto.com
Lauren Blackwell
www.redleashphoto.com
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
Thanks, CJ! 21 RAW frames in that shot, all batch processed at all phases with no chance of variability in white balance. I think what you must be seeing is a natural color gradient across the sky.
Cheers,
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
Save $5 on a new Smugmug Membership
Host your website for just $3.45/mo with JustHost - Rated best web host of 2010
See my profile for a gear list & more
its in the rocks.
Loved it
My Gallery