OK, please let me drift a bit and ask a question. How do you take pictures like this and avoid getting big blobby sun flares? I realize some lenses are more prone to flare than others, but are their any tips for minimizing it.
OK, please let me drift a bit and ask a question. How do you take pictures like this and avoid getting big blobby sun flares? I realize some lenses are more prone to flare than others, but are their any tips for minimizing it.
That is a great question, and I do not have the answer, but I have no doubt others will. This shot had lots of blobby sun flares which I cloned out
* There's some fairly heavy noise in the clouds, did you increase the brightness in post?
* There are parts of the image that are unnaturally dark - for example the upper left near and around that bush, and parts of the horizon on the right. Did you use a GND filter >= 3 stops? That could explain it. The upper left corner also shows some signs of vignetting.
* There's a weird dark blotchy spot on the right horizon
* The crop is a little off (you can't tell on a white background, but you can tell on a black one). Looks like you just need to shave a snippet off the right.
I think the foreground is really good, it's just the background areas that need work. High contrast scenes like this are nearly impossible to process, and I admire your stamina
This is definitely on my places to visit, but a rental car won't cut it
* There's some fairly heavy noise in the clouds, did you increase the brightness in post?
* There are parts of the image that are unnaturally dark - for example the upper left near and around that bush, and parts of the horizon on the right. Did you use a GND filter >= 3 stops? That could explain it. The upper left corner also shows some signs of vignetting.
* There's a weird dark blotchy spot on the right horizon
* The crop is a little off (you can't tell on a white background, but you can tell on a black one). Looks like you just need to shave a snippet off the right.
I think the foreground is really good, it's just the background areas that need work. High contrast scenes like this are nearly impossible to process, and I admire your stamina
This is definitely on my places to visit, but a rental car won't cut it
Of course you are right on all counts, which just validates the fact that I can not manually blend as well as Photomatix. I keep trying to produce a better photo than my original, and I keep failing. However, Ron, I do sincerely appreciate you taking the time to ruin my day
Of course you are right on all counts, which just validates the fact that I can not manually blend as well as Photomatix. I keep trying to produce a better photo than my original, and I keep failing. However, Ron, I do sincerely appreciate you taking the time to ruin my day
At least I accomplished something today!
Ultimately it's the results that matter, not the post processing technique used to get there. If Photomatix works, then use it! But don't give up on manual blends just yet. A scene like this is about as tough as it's going to get, I rarely shoot scenes with this much contrast.
Ultimately it's the results that matter, not the post processing technique used to get there. If Photomatix works, then use it! But don't give up on manual blends just yet. A scene like this is about as tough as it's going to get, I rarely shoot scenes with this much contrast.
I think when I shot this I shot 3-5 frames as an HDR, all with a 3 stop GND at the same time. It is really dark down in that canyon, and, of course, very bright near the sun.
That viewpoint is just one of those spots that you have to see in person.
Great shot, Dan. Yeah, there are some technical issues but to my mind it's as much about the emotional reaction you can generate in the viewer from the image and this one works in that regard.
OK, please let me drift a bit and ask a question. How do you take pictures like this and avoid getting big blobby sun flares? I realize some lenses are more prone to flare than others, but are their any tips for minimizing it.
I love Toroweap! I hope to get back there soon. I agree w/ a lot of comments, bit gonna go even one further; did you have more than a single filter on the front of your camera, and was this a high grade lens or a consumer lens? Normally, to see multiple lines like that means that the light is hitting or reflecting off one thing per line. There's still a tiny bit of green flare in the center FG rocks. The way to avoid flare is partly dependent on atmoshperics; how high the sun, how much haze and diffusion, and how much of the disc is visible. Generally a high quality lens, not having anything in front of the front element, and the sun one (up to three) solar disc(s) above the horizon, depending on haze, or if the sun is obscured by any clouds.
Great shot, Dan. Yeah, there are some technical issues but to my mind it's as much about the emotional reaction you can generate in the viewer from the image and this one works in that regard.
annnna8888Registered Users, Super ModeratorsPosts: 936SmugMug Employee
edited November 25, 2010
Stunning, Dan! My kind of landscape! You captured it beautifully. I do agree with some points mentioned by others, e.g. upping the contrast a little bit and eliminating the white band left after cropping, but these are just minor technicalities. The photo is still a winner.
Stunning, Dan! My kind of landscape! You captured it beautifully. I do agree with some points mentioned by others, e.g. upping the contrast a little bit and eliminating the white band left after cropping, but these are just minor technicalities. The photo is still a winner.
Ana
Thank you Ana. Here is the same shot processed differently. What do you think?
Thank you Ana. Here is the same shot processed differently. What do you think?
I think this is MUCH better. You lose some of the drama without the sun star, but everything else about this second photo is better, the foreground is more crisp and sharp, there's no halos or weird dark spots on the horizon or by those bushes. Definitely an improvement!
Thank you Ana. Here is the same shot processed differently. What do you think?
While the second photo is crisper, has more midtone contrast/detail and loses the halos, it lacks, IMHO, the very component that is essential for a great landscape photo - light. It's quite flat compared to the first one, which - flaws apart - glows with the sweet golden light that can't be replaced or surpassed by anything else. So if you can try and post-process the first shot a bit differently to avoid the above-mentioned shortcomings and retain the sweet light, you've got yourself a winner.
This is definitely on my places to visit, but a rental car won't cut it
You can make it in a Suburban easily, Ron.
My Ridgeline made it without difficulties at all. You really will want 4WD and good ground clearance, but any 4WD pickup should suffice.
Some folks do get there in a 2WD compact car, at times; I have seen them there, but I would not attempt that unless I was with a group that could save my back sides if the weather changed, or I had a bit of bad luck. You are almost a 100 miles from pavement and no cell phone coverage at all. Take plenty of water, and some shade.
Make sure you have a good spare tire, or maybe even two. And a snatchem strap. There are some rock ledges about 8-10 inches tall along the way. There are some sand pits that you need to negotiate also.
It is a great place to visit and photograph. Thanks again, Aaron, for taking me there.
My Ridgeline made it without difficulties at all. You really will want 4WD and good ground clearance, but any 4WD pickup should suffice.
Some folks do get there in a 2WD compact car, at times; I have seen them there, but I would not attempt that unless I was with a group that could save my back sides if the weather changed, or I had a bit of bad luck. You are almost a 100 miles from pavement and no cell phone coverage at all. Take plenty of water, and some shade.
Make sure you have a good spare tire, or maybe even two. And a snatchem strap. There are some rock ledges about 8-10 inches tall along the way. There are some sand pits that you need to negotiate also.
It is a great place to visit and photograph. Thanks again, Aaron, for taking me there.
Oh yeah, sandpits are there for sure:
As Jim said, most of the road is totally fine for any 2WD vehicle, it's just the last few miles is where you would appreciate a higher clearance and if not 4WD, then at least a few buddies
The reprocessed photo is a great improvement. The colors are more vivid and the canyon really comes alive. I do miss that fantastic sun star, but oh well.
Comments
Thanks Trey. Definitely worth the trip, but make sure you have a good four wheel vehicle
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
It might benefit from a touch more contrast, but I am on my girlfriend's laptop right now, so it might be the crappy screen!
Reminds me that "Toroweap Sunrise Photos" are STILL on my to do list...
SmugMug QA
My Photos
Thanks Pam. It's a 1.25 miles down so, believe me, I felt alive; and I wanted to stay that way
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Bart Williams
Oregon
http://nwprophoto.smugmug.com/
OK, please let me drift a bit and ask a question. How do you take pictures like this and avoid getting big blobby sun flares? I realize some lenses are more prone to flare than others, but are their any tips for minimizing it.
My SmugMug
That is a great question, and I do not have the answer, but I have no doubt others will. This shot had lots of blobby sun flares which I cloned out
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
* There's some fairly heavy noise in the clouds, did you increase the brightness in post?
* There are parts of the image that are unnaturally dark - for example the upper left near and around that bush, and parts of the horizon on the right. Did you use a GND filter >= 3 stops? That could explain it. The upper left corner also shows some signs of vignetting.
* There's a weird dark blotchy spot on the right horizon
* The crop is a little off (you can't tell on a white background, but you can tell on a black one). Looks like you just need to shave a snippet off the right.
I think the foreground is really good, it's just the background areas that need work. High contrast scenes like this are nearly impossible to process, and I admire your stamina
This is definitely on my places to visit, but a rental car won't cut it
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
I don't know whether to be disgusted or in awe...
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
Of course you are right on all counts, which just validates the fact that I can not manually blend as well as Photomatix. I keep trying to produce a better photo than my original, and I keep failing. However, Ron, I do sincerely appreciate you taking the time to ruin my day
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
At least I accomplished something today!
Ultimately it's the results that matter, not the post processing technique used to get there. If Photomatix works, then use it! But don't give up on manual blends just yet. A scene like this is about as tough as it's going to get, I rarely shoot scenes with this much contrast.
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
Thanks, Doug. I am glad you like it
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
I think a little bit of both is the correct answer!
SmugMug QA
My Photos
I think when I shot this I shot 3-5 frames as an HDR, all with a 3 stop GND at the same time. It is really dark down in that canyon, and, of course, very bright near the sun.
That viewpoint is just one of those spots that you have to see in person.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Amanda's | Photocreations
http://amandasphotocreations.smugmug.com/
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
Gary Crabbe
Enlightened Images
Enlightened Images Views (Weblog)
Facebook
Twitter
SmugMug
Thanks folks.
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Ana
SmugMug Support Hero Manager
My website: anapogacar.smugmug.com
Thank you Ana. Here is the same shot processed differently. What do you think?
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
I think this is MUCH better. You lose some of the drama without the sun star, but everything else about this second photo is better, the foreground is more crisp and sharp, there's no halos or weird dark spots on the horizon or by those bushes. Definitely an improvement!
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
While the second photo is crisper, has more midtone contrast/detail and loses the halos, it lacks, IMHO, the very component that is essential for a great landscape photo - light. It's quite flat compared to the first one, which - flaws apart - glows with the sweet golden light that can't be replaced or surpassed by anything else. So if you can try and post-process the first shot a bit differently to avoid the above-mentioned shortcomings and retain the sweet light, you've got yourself a winner.
Ana
SmugMug Support Hero Manager
My website: anapogacar.smugmug.com
You can make it in a Suburban easily, Ron.
My Ridgeline made it without difficulties at all. You really will want 4WD and good ground clearance, but any 4WD pickup should suffice.
Some folks do get there in a 2WD compact car, at times; I have seen them there, but I would not attempt that unless I was with a group that could save my back sides if the weather changed, or I had a bit of bad luck. You are almost a 100 miles from pavement and no cell phone coverage at all. Take plenty of water, and some shade.
Make sure you have a good spare tire, or maybe even two. And a snatchem strap. There are some rock ledges about 8-10 inches tall along the way. There are some sand pits that you need to negotiate also.
It is a great place to visit and photograph. Thanks again, Aaron, for taking me there.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
I see you visited the coveted "Nelson point" again
Nice image!
And I take it, it wasn't 104F either
Oh yeah, sandpits are there for sure:
As Jim said, most of the road is totally fine for any 2WD vehicle, it's just the last few miles is where you would appreciate a higher clearance and if not 4WD, then at least a few buddies