No John its still only one person. I don't use the script artistically merely to provide some idea on how and with what equipment a pic was taken. I don't really need the copyright and never needed it before because I don't see my stuff as commercial and I'm not concerned with anyone "stealing" it.
I would look Jon but I really don't give a darn. I looked when you sent me the PM and I don't need to look again. If it bothers you that much I'll just drop the script. It will be one less step for myself when I process a shot for the net.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
No John its still only one person. I don't use the script artistically merely to provide some idea on how and with what equipment a pic was taken. I don't really need the copyright and never needed it before because I don't see my stuff as commercial and I'm not concerned with anyone "stealing" it.
I would look Jon but I really don't give a darn. I looked when you sent me the PM and I don't need to look again. If it bothers you that much I'll just drop the script. It will be one less step for myself when I process a shot for the net.
Man, sorry!!! From what you said here, I thought I was doing you a favor by trying to fix a few bugs and limitations in the script you use. But I guess you've achieved a pinnacle of perfection incompatible with any input other than unvarnished adulation. That must be nice for you.
Man, sorry!!! From what you said here, I thought I was doing you a favor by trying to fix a few bugs and limitations in the script you use. But I guess you've achieved a pinnacle of perfection incompatible with any input other than unvarnished adulation. That must be nice for you.
Golly Rutt. I said that an improved script would be neat. I never said that it had any great attraction for myself.
I have no stake in the script, in fact I think it distracts from my pictures. I have stated before that I personally don't like any framing on pics unless its hanging on a wall.
I'm not a geek. I have very little interest in technology. I just like to take pictures. I begrudgingly use PS because I have to and I will never be a PS wiz. My interests lies in taking a pic, the settings, the use of light and colors, and composition.
Its not my script and any critique of it has no impact on me. Now if you want to critique my photography I'm all ears. I don't expect adulation (it would be nice though). I see better shots than my own efforts every day here on Dgrin, FM, and the Nikon Cafe. I'm just a fat retired dude doing what he loves, taking pictures. I will never be a pro (requires the "W" word") and I don't hold myself out to be one. I'm just a duffer doing my best.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Comments
that 100% crop is amazing!!!!!!
20D | 300D-IR | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 18-55 | 50 f/1.8 II | 70-200 f/4L | 17-40L | Lensbaby 2.0 | 250D | 550ex | Gitzo 1257 | RRS BH-40 | RRS L-plates
The Blog | The Photos
I would look Jon but I really don't give a darn. I looked when you sent me the PM and I don't need to look again. If it bothers you that much I'll just drop the script. It will be one less step for myself when I process a shot for the net.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Thank you Dani.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Man, sorry!!! From what you said here, I thought I was doing you a favor by trying to fix a few bugs and limitations in the script you use. But I guess you've achieved a pinnacle of perfection incompatible with any input other than unvarnished adulation. That must be nice for you.
Golly Rutt. I said that an improved script would be neat. I never said that it had any great attraction for myself.
I have no stake in the script, in fact I think it distracts from my pictures. I have stated before that I personally don't like any framing on pics unless its hanging on a wall.
I'm not a geek. I have very little interest in technology. I just like to take pictures. I begrudgingly use PS because I have to and I will never be a PS wiz. My interests lies in taking a pic, the settings, the use of light and colors, and composition.
Its not my script and any critique of it has no impact on me. Now if you want to critique my photography I'm all ears. I don't expect adulation (it would be nice though). I see better shots than my own efforts every day here on Dgrin, FM, and the Nikon Cafe. I'm just a fat retired dude doing what he loves, taking pictures. I will never be a pro (requires the "W" word") and I don't hold myself out to be one. I'm just a duffer doing my best.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"