Options

Get serious . . . on a budget

2»

Comments

  • Options
    cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    I don't remember the exposure data for these two images but they were probably very similar - Both lenses were used at ~ 70mm - both were shot RAW and brought into PS about the same way.
    We used to see the EXIF data on smugmug - but I do not see it for these two pictures even tho it is authorized for this gallery. Has this been changed in smugmug for some reason?
    Well the one at pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/2196039-O.jpg

    ISO 100
    1/180
    f8
    +9 Saturation
    25 Sharpness
    +25 Contrast
    +.2 ev exposure compensation
    75mm focal length
    28-75 Lens

    What is the location of the other one?
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited February 9, 2004
    cmr164 wrote:
    Well the one at pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/2196039-O.jpg

    ISO 100
    1/180
    f8
    +9 Saturation
    25 Sharpness
    +25 Contrast
    +.2 ev exposure compensation
    75mm focal length
    28-75 Lens

    What is the location of the other one?
    http://pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/2196043-L.jpg This is an original frame taken with a Canon 70-200F2.8 IS L at ~70 mm - and is almost a duplicate of the frame whose exif data you listed above.
    There used to be a button on my Smugmug Gallery that gave the EXIF data - but it is no longer there - I presume you used your own Exif reader program for that information about the Tamron 28-75mm lens. There were two almost identical pictures - one with the Tamron 28-75 at 70mm and one with the Canon 70-200f2.8 at ~70mm - for comparison. Thank you for the exif data above.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Options
    fishfish Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    There used to be a button on my Smugmug Gallery that gave the EXIF data - but it is no longer there
    That's pretty weird. The link is on some of the other photos in that gallery, such as this one: http://Pathfinder.smugmug.com/gallery/20559/1/704484/Medium
    "Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston
    "The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
  • Options
    cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    http://pathfinder.smugmug.com/photos/2196043-L.jpg This is an original frame taken with a Canon 70-200F2.8 IS L at ~70 mm - and is almost a duplicate of the frame whose exif data you listed above.
    There used to be a button on my Smugmug Gallery that gave the EXIF data - but it is no longer there - I presume you used your own Exif reader program for that information about the Tamron 28-75mm lens. There were two almost identical pictures - one with the Tamron 28-75 at 70mm and one with the Canon 70-200f2.8 at ~70mm - for comparison. Thank you for the exif data above.
    I guess you meant ../2196043-O.jpg and no I did not use an exif reader. I manually examined the embedded text using the UNIX command 'strings 2196043-O.jpg | more'

    ISO 100
    1/350
    f8
    90mm focal length
    70-200mm lens
    exposure Bias = -1
    noise reduction 25
    sharpness 25
    saturation +10
    contrast +25
    brightness +50
    exposure +1.10

    Looks like the camera was set 1 stop under and you added in 1.1 in the conversion from raw and the 'shopped in increases in brightness, saturation and contrast.

    The data I actually see is:

    <crs:Version>2.0</crs:Version>
    <crs:RawFileName>CRW_4376.CRW</crs:RawFileName>
    <crs:WhiteBalance>As Shot</crs:WhiteBalance>
    <crs:Exposure>+1.10</crs:Exposure>
    <crs:Shadows>15</crs:Shadows>
    <crs:Brightness>50</crs:Brightness>
    <crs:Contrast>+25</crs:Contrast>
    <crs:Saturation>+10</crs:Saturation>
    <crs:Sharpness>25</crs:Sharpness>
    <crs:LuminanceSmoothing>0</crs:LuminanceSmoothing>
    <crs:ColorNoiseReduction>25</crs:ColorNoiseReduction>
    <crs:ChromaticAberrationR>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationR>
    <crs:ChromaticAberrationB>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationB>
    <crs:VignetteAmount>0</crs:VignetteAmount>
    <crs:ShadowTint>0</crs:ShadowTint>
    <crs:RedHue>0</crs:RedHue>
    <crs:RedSaturation>0</crs:RedSaturation>
    <crs:GreenHue>0</crs:GreenHue>
    <crs:GreenSaturation>0</crs:GreenSaturation>
    <crs:BlueHue>0</crs:BlueHue>
    <crs:BlueSaturation>0</crs:BlueSaturation>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about='uuid:52f61efa-5217-11d8-b0cf-bbe58a8c29eb'
    xmlns:exif='http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0/'&gt;
    <exif:ExposureTime>1/350</exif:ExposureTime>
    <exif:ShutterSpeedValue>8451211/1000000</exif:ShutterSpeedValue>
    <exif:FNumber>8/1</exif:FNumber>
    <exif:ApertureValue>6/1</exif:ApertureValue>
    <exif:ExposureProgram>3</exif:ExposureProgram>
    <exif:ISOSpeedRatings>
    <rdf:Seq>
    <rdf:li>100</rdf:li>
    </rdf:Seq>
    </exif:ISOSpeedRatings>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>2004-01-28T16:18:02Z</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
    <exif:ExposureBiasValue>-1/1</exif:ExposureBiasValue>
    <exif:MeteringMode>5</exif:MeteringMode>
    <exif:Flash rdf:parseType='Resource'>
    <exif:Fired>False</exif:Fired>
    <exif:Return>0</exif:Return>
    </exif:Flash>
    <exif:FocalLength>90/1</exif:FocalLength>
    <exif:ColorSpace>4294967295</exif:ColorSpace>
    <exif:PixelXDimension>2980</exif:PixelXDimension>
    <exif:PixelYDimension>1796</exif:PixelYDimension>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about='uuid:52f61efa-5217-11d8-b0cf-bbe58a8c29eb'
    xmlns:aux='http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0/aux/'&gt;
    <aux:SerialNumber>0520214059</aux:SerialNumber>
    <aux:Lens>70.0-200.0 mm</aux:Lens>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about='uuid:52f61efa-5217-11d8-b0cf-bbe58a8c29eb'
    xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/'&gt;
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about='uuid:52f61efa-5217-11d8-b0cf-bbe58a8c29eb'
    xmlns:photoshop='http://ns.adobe.com/photoshop/1.0/'&gt;
    <photoshop:History></photoshop:History>
    </rdf:Description>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about='uuid:52f61efa-5217-11d8-b0cf-bbe58a8c29eb'
    xmlns:tiff='http://ns.adobe.com/tiff/1.0/'&gt;
    <tiff:Make>Canon</tiff:Make>
    <tiff:Model>Canon EOS 10D</tiff:Model>
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited February 9, 2004
    cmr164 wrote:
    I guess you meant ../2196043-O.jpg and no I did not use an exif reader. I manually examined the embedded text using the UNIX command 'strings 2196043-O.jpg | more'
    You're using a Linux box or a Mac then? Unix commands won't work on my XP machine I don't think, will they?

    Pathfinder
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited February 9, 2004
    fish wrote:
    That's pretty weird. The link is on some of the other photos in that gallery, such as this one: http://Pathfinder.smugmug.com/gallery/20559/1/704484/Medium
    I know - I just looked at my Americana Gallery and some of the pictures have the "More photo details" button immediately to the right of the "Taken with a
    " directly underneath the picture - but some do not.
    I think it is the more recent pictures that do not have the button - but some of them do have it !!!! .... What gives? I am perplexed or confused or both eg "cornplexed or perfused" hah!!
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Options
    cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    You're using a Linux box or a Mac then? Unix commands won't work on my XP machine I don't think, will they?

    Pathfinder
    I use MacOSX, Tru64, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD ... in a declining order. You can probably open the jpg in the XP's texteditor or do a 'type xxxx.jpg|more' in a command window.
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • Options
    fishfish Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited February 9, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    I know - I just looked at my Americana Gallery and some of the pictures have the "More photo details" button immediately to the right of the "Taken with a
    " directly underneath the picture - but some do not.
    I think it is the more recent pictures that do not have the button - but some of them do have it !!!! .... What gives? I am perplexed or confused or both eg "cornplexed or perfused" hah!!
    I recommend you ask help@smugmug.com.
    "Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston
    "The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited February 9, 2004
    fish wrote:
    I recommend you ask [email="help@smugmug.com."]help@smugmug.com.[/email]

    Thanks - will do just that.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Sign In or Register to comment.