sapphire73Registered Users, Super ModeratorsPosts: 1,971moderator
edited May 14, 2009
Serendipity?
I came across this frame within a frame of foliage while walking through a nature preserve on Sunday, and it seemed serendipitous to me at the time.
BTW, if anyone looked at this thread earlier today, you may have seen a post from me with some photos - one in particular - that had me thinking vanishing point, window, and/or frame in frame as I was taking each one. The main reason for deleting that message is that it had 5 images in it, and I think I will just post one entry at a time unless the assignment requires mulitiples. If this image doesn't qualify for frame in frame, perhaps I will repost one of the others. Thanks.
I came across this frame within a frame of foliage while walking through a nature preserve on Sunday, and it seemed serendipitous to me at the time.
BTW, if anyone looked at this thread earlier today, you may have seen a post from me with some photos - one in particular - that had me thinking vanishing point, window, and/or frame in frame as I was taking each one. The main reason for deleting that message is that it had 5 images in it, and I think I will just post one entry at a time unless the assignment requires mulitiples. If this image doesn't qualify for frame in frame, perhaps I will repost one of the others. Thanks.
Thank you!
Some images do tend to match several categories. You have to decide. FWIW, it's great here as it is!
"May the f/stop be with you!"
0
sapphire73Registered Users, Super ModeratorsPosts: 1,971moderator
edited May 17, 2009
Construction Site
Here is another shot taken with frame in frame in mind. This was taken at a construction site at the end of their work day (after 7 pm), so I didn't have as much light as I would have liked.
I have another shot of this entrance "framed" by a piece of the chain link fence that keeps photographers and other such folk out of harm's way.
Here is another shot taken with frame in frame in mind. This was taken at a construction site at the end of their work day (after 7 pm), so I didn't have as much light as I would have liked.
I have another shot of this entrance "framed" by a piece of the chain link fence that keeps photographers and other such folk out of harm's way.
In Louisiana the water table tends to be very high so many graves are above ground. In some cemeteries that are very old, some of the tombs begin to fall apart. Sometimes if you look through one at just the right angle you can see what you would hope ...
D80. 18-200 at 18mm. f11 @ 1/125. SB800 on the ground in front of the tomb.
Chad - www.brberrys.com
If I post it, please tell me how to make it better. My fragile ego can take it.
In Louisiana the water table tends to be very high so many graves are above ground. In some cemeteries that are very old, some of the tombs begin to fall apart. Sometimes if you look through one at just the right angle you can see what you would hope ...
D80. 18-200 at 18mm. f11 @ 1/125. SB800 on the ground in front of the tomb.
It hit me
I was looking through the old postings saw this one on frames. I took my kids to the beach yesterday and saw this shot, and just had to take it. I hope it's ok to post images to old assignments.
I was looking through the old postings saw this one on frames. I took my kids to the beach yesterday and saw this shot, and just had to take it. I hope it's ok to post images to old assignments.
Great frame! And yes, it's ok to submit to old WAs as long as the capture is fresh...
Great picture but incomplete frame.
It's almost always a good idea to have a framing element in the image. In this class we're looking for more the pronounced feature, like frame in frame (in frame).
... Now let's do one of the composition classics: Frame in Frame. Possibilities are endless, just get your camera and start clicking! As always: fresh pictures only, no massive PS compositing, etc...Let's get framed!
Great picture but incomplete frame.
It's almost always a good idea to have a framing element in the image. In this class we're looking for more the pronounced feature, like frame in frame (in frame).
Please explain your criteria looking at these three pictures with the same concept so I can understand better:
* The first one is the young man framed by the motorcycle and it looks like you liked it. I
* The second one is the building framed by the say "tunnel". You didn't like it.
* The last one is the man framed by the door of the car and it looks like you liked it. I
What am I missing ?
Am I wrong ?
Where ?
Am I missing the concept ?
What is the difference among these pictures ?
I look and I don't see. My problem probably. :cry
Please explain your criteria looking at these three pictures with the same concept so I can understand better:
* The first one is the young man framed by the motorcycle and it looks like you liked it. I
* The second one is the building framed by the say "tunnel". You didn't like it.
* The last one is the man framed by the door of the car and it looks like you liked it. I
What am I missing ?
Am I wrong ?
Where ?
Am I missing the concept ?
What is the difference among these pictures ?
I look and I don't see. My problem probably. :cry
Thank you.
. .
Antonio,
first of all, don't sweat over it. You already played with this one in the very beginning and I'd rather you concentrated on the new topics.
Second, please take a look at entries #9, #16/2 and #34/2 for the "frame in frame" examples.
Antonio,
first of all, don't sweat over it. You already played with this one in the very beginning and I'd rather you concentrated on the new topics.
Second, please take a look at entries #9, #16/2 and #34/2 for the "frame in frame" examples.
Sorry, but not really... Please refer to posts #9, #16/2 and #34/2 for the proper "frame in frame" examples. And FWIW I hate HDR It also breaks a cardinal rule no no major postprocessing
Sorry, but not really... Please refer to posts #9, #16/2 and #34/2 for the proper "frame in frame" examples. And FWIW I hate HDR It also breaks a cardinal rule no no major postprocessing
Ah, OK... No major post-processing has been done, but if you hate HDR, please excuse, I didn't know...
About the frames, I was wondering if this could be considered such an image... so it's not.
HDR by the very nature of things *is* a major post-processing
Well, this is the original:
Myself I don't see any major change to this image on the first one I posted,
(other than more saturated colors and increased contrast),
but I don't mean at all to start a contradictory dialog here.
If the photo is not good for frames in frames, that's all I needed to know
- I just wasn't sure...
Myself I don't see any major change to this image on the first one I posted,
(other than more saturated colors and increased contrast),
but I don't mean at all to start a contradictory dialog here.
If the photo is not good for frames in frames, that's all I needed to know
- I just wasn't sure...
BTW: I didn't use ANY HDR
While there are many "frames" in this image, they do not add to the primary concept of this assignment. So, in short, it doesn't work.
Comments
I came across this frame within a frame of foliage while walking through a nature preserve on Sunday, and it seemed serendipitous to me at the time.
BTW, if anyone looked at this thread earlier today, you may have seen a post from me with some photos - one in particular - that had me thinking vanishing point, window, and/or frame in frame as I was taking each one. The main reason for deleting that message is that it had 5 images in it, and I think I will just post one entry at a time unless the assignment requires mulitiples. If this image doesn't qualify for frame in frame, perhaps I will repost one of the others. Thanks.
My SmugMug Galleries
Thank you!
Some images do tend to match several categories. You have to decide. FWIW, it's great here as it is!
Here is another shot taken with frame in frame in mind. This was taken at a construction site at the end of their work day (after 7 pm), so I didn't have as much light as I would have liked.
I have another shot of this entrance "framed" by a piece of the chain link fence that keeps photographers and other such folk out of harm's way.
My SmugMug Galleries
Classic!
f3.2, 1/8 sec, ISO 100, 11.5 mm
D80. 18-200 at 18mm. f11 @ 1/125. SB800 on the ground in front of the tomb.
If I post it, please tell me how to make it better. My fragile ego can take it.
Nice image, great framing!
(Copyright Scott Jenkins)
www.twodragonfliesphotography.com
I was looking through the old postings saw this one on frames. I took my kids to the beach yesterday and saw this shot, and just had to take it. I hope it's ok to post images to old assignments.
Commercial Photographer
http://www.FredJClaus.com
http://www.Fredjclaus.com/originals
Save on your own SmugMug account. Just enter Coupon code i2J0HIOcEElwI at checkout
Can you please tell me what the current assignment is?
Commercial Photographer
http://www.FredJClaus.com
http://www.Fredjclaus.com/originals
Save on your own SmugMug account. Just enter Coupon code i2J0HIOcEElwI at checkout
It's almost always a good idea to have a framing element in the image. In this class we're looking for more the pronounced feature, like frame in frame (in frame).
Please explain your criteria looking at these three pictures with the same concept so I can understand better:
* The first one is the young man framed by the motorcycle and it looks like you liked it. I
* The second one is the building framed by the say "tunnel". You didn't like it.
* The last one is the man framed by the door of the car and it looks like you liked it. I
What am I missing ?
Am I wrong ?
Where ?
Am I missing the concept ?
What is the difference among these pictures ?
I look and I don't see. My problem probably. :cry
Thank you.
first of all, don't sweat over it. You already played with this one in the very beginning and I'd rather you concentrated on the new topics.
Second, please take a look at entries #9, #16/2 and #34/2 for the "frame in frame" examples.
I thought so ...
Is this good?
TravelwaysPhotos.com ...... Facebook
VegasGreatAttractions.com
Travelways.com
And FWIW I hate HDR
Ah, OK...
About the frames, I was wondering if this could be considered such an image... so it's not.
Good to know, thank you
TravelwaysPhotos.com ...... Facebook
VegasGreatAttractions.com
Travelways.com
Well, this is the original:
Myself I don't see any major change to this image on the first one I posted,
(other than more saturated colors and increased contrast),
but I don't mean at all to start a contradictory dialog here.
If the photo is not good for frames in frames, that's all I needed to know
- I just wasn't sure...
BTW: I didn't use ANY HDR
TravelwaysPhotos.com ...... Facebook
VegasGreatAttractions.com
Travelways.com
While there are many "frames" in this image, they do not add to the primary concept of this assignment. So, in short, it doesn't work.
Thanks
TravelwaysPhotos.com ...... Facebook
VegasGreatAttractions.com
Travelways.com