I just came upon this thread..and I have noticed this in Marc's pictures..I am so excited to go try this now and post what I get, I just have a few questions. So I need to shoot at f22 or smaller? I guess I never figured this out because I was told that diffraction makes things not as sharp past f16..one of my questions is should I be concerned about that..my second question is how to get the cool effect but keep from getting wierd discolored sun spots..I have seen some images with sun spots and some with out them..how can I shoot into the sun but avoid those?
Thanks in advance
"Character, like a photograph, develops in darkness."-Yousuf Karsh
I just came upon this thread..and I have noticed this in Marc's pictures..I am so excited to go try this now and post what I get, I just have a few questions. So I need to shoot at f22 or smaller? I guess I never figured this out because I was told that diffraction makes things not as sharp past f16..one of my questions is should I be concerned about that..my second question is how to get the cool effect but keep from getting wierd discolored sun spots..I have seen some images with sun spots and some with out them..how can I shoot into the sun but avoid those?
Thanks in advance
It depends on the lens. Some will get you there at f11. The key is to have the sun partially occluded.
Thanks schmoo.
The easy way for that flower shot .... hold the camera below it, and watch the shadow on the lens.
Snap off a few and see if you like what you got. (I know, I cheat):D
I just came upon this thread..and I have noticed this in Marc's pictures..I am so excited to go try this now and post what I get, I just have a few questions. So I need to shoot at f22 or smaller? I guess I never figured this out because I was told that diffraction makes things not as sharp past f16..one of my questions is should I be concerned about that..my second question is how to get the cool effect but keep from getting wierd discolored sun spots..I have seen some images with sun spots and some with out them..how can I shoot into the sun but avoid those?
Thanks in advance
Smaller apertures work better, but f11 or smaller may work for your DSLR, f16 or f18 almost certainly will.
F8 works for this shot with my point and shoot, G9
Prime lenses give sharper, cleaner stars than zooms.
24 T&S f22
24-105 f4 IS at f16, 24mm
When shooting into the sun, lens flair is always a possibility. Good, prime lenses help to diminish the probability.
Yes it is true by partially obscuring the sun you can alleviate the colored flares. However, the star itself will be full if show the entire sun. Also the wider the lens the better the effect.
I think the answer is that you want the light source to be small in the frame. If the lens is wide enough, then the effective size of the sun is small enough that you don't need partial occlusion. This, shot with a 15mm fish, has a bit of a star from the full sun in a completely clear sky.
Comments
Monkeypod tree, Panaewa Zoo, Hilo, Hawaii
Peace,
Sanaka
Kit lens for now: 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
Well, I can't argue that. It's a great lens and Dgrinners love to share!
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
From www.usopen.com
http://img.skitch.com/20080616-b1iep8kbuxig4pykwrcasa1yuf.jpg
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Here is one i got
My Gallery
I got 2 stars in this one
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
My Camera:ivar
Here's one:
http://jziegler.smugmug.com
ROSS1245.jpg
Thanks in advance
www.danielchappellphotography.com
Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
Wow Dave I know you're a tall guy... where'd you find such a huge flower?
(Just kidding! really awesome perspective)
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Au contraire, mon frère?
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
He used a cloud, dear.
I think? We should ask him!
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
I didn't in this one, but I'm no expert!
...... Marc?????
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
The easy way for that flower shot .... hold the camera below it, and watch the shadow on the lens.
Snap off a few and see if you like what you got. (I know, I cheat):D
Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
Smaller apertures work better, but f11 or smaller may work for your DSLR, f16 or f18 almost certainly will.
F8 works for this shot with my point and shoot, G9
Prime lenses give sharper, cleaner stars than zooms.
24 T&S f22
24-105 f4 IS at f16, 24mm
When shooting into the sun, lens flair is always a possibility. Good, prime lenses help to diminish the probability.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Click for EXIF
http://slinky0390.smugmug.com
www.danielchappellphotography.com
Canon 40D, Canon 10-22 @ 17mm, 1/200 F/22 ISO400
An uncompleted section of the Lehigh Gorge Rail-Trail, Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Not perfect however... must re-shoot.:D
Yes it is true by partially obscuring the sun you can alleviate the colored flares. However, the star itself will be full if show the entire sun. Also the wider the lens the better the effect.
The thin cirrus clouds wont change much.
Muench Workshops
MW on Facebook
Canon G9 shots
1.
2.
3.
4.
I think the answer is that you want the light source to be small in the frame. If the lens is wide enough, then the effective size of the sun is small enough that you don't need partial occlusion. This, shot with a 15mm fish, has a bit of a star from the full sun in a completely clear sky.