Discussion -- Accessories Reviews
ian408
Administrators Posts: 21,948 moderator
Greetings,
I've added a sticky "reviews" thread.
What I'd like to do is gather comments and suggestions in this thread and
periodically incorporate them into the reviews. The idea is to keep a separate
discussion going here.
This is my first attempt at this so go easy
If you have comments or suggestions, feel free to start a discussion.
Cheers,
Ian
I've added a sticky "reviews" thread.
What I'd like to do is gather comments and suggestions in this thread and
periodically incorporate them into the reviews. The idea is to keep a separate
discussion going here.
This is my first attempt at this so go easy
If you have comments or suggestions, feel free to start a discussion.
Cheers,
Ian
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
0
Comments
Just to start the ball rolling Ian,
I was out this afternoon and took over 100 photos. All of the photos I took of birds in flight were out of focus and had to be deleted. I didn't have a tripod or monopod with me. I left them at home. I set the aperature speed as high as I could but didn't get a good one.
I am using a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 lens. When a shot was in focus it was sharp. Eg:
This shot was taken while resting on a fence post.
This is a long introduction to my question. Would IS have made a difference. If you wish post examples.
I also wondered if sometimes a lens gets a bad reputation as being soft when a contributory factor is bad technique? as in my case where I couldn't handhold the camera properly?
Shay.
"Failure is feedback. And feedback is the breakfast of champions." - fortune cookie
What was your focal length, shutter and aperture for that shot?
Without a doubt it happens.
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Date Taken:2005-03-03 14:47:59Date Digitized:2005-03-03 14:47:59Date Modified:2005-03-03 17:57:11Make:CanonModel: Canon EOS 20D Size: 2544x1696 Bytes: 1664894 Aperture: f/5.6 ISO: 100 Focal Length: 70mm (guess: 75mm in 35mm) Exposure Time: 0.0031s (1/320)Flash:Flash did not fire, compulsory flash modeExposure Program:Normal programExposure Bias:0ColorSpace:sRGB
I am very curious about the whole IS thing. I bought the Sigma because it was €1400 cheaper than the Canon 70-200 f2.8 is. My next lens is probably going to be the Canon 400 5.6 but for around the same price I can get the 300 f4 IS. With a 1.4 extender I get 400 5.6 and IS. A very favourable review of the 400:
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/forgotten-400.shtml
I am starting to think that taking pictures is like shooting. Never shoot standing if you can help it. Find something to lean against or lug a tripod.
If so, I can think of a couple of reasons, and IS wouldn't help in either case. The first problem might be a too slow shutter speed. You're panning across the sky and traking the birds. Unless you have a really fast shutter speed, or have perfectly matched the birds' speed, you're likely to get blur.
The second reason might be that your camera/lens simply didn't autofocus on the birds. If your aperature was at 5.6 and the birds were only in a small portion of your frame, there's a good chance your camera got confused and tried to focus on the sky. BTDT
I'm learning that autofocus works best with really wide aperatures. And that panning with slow shutter speeds is a skill. I suspect both played a part in your bad shots.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Of course, any great lens can be used to create a poor, blurry image through poor photographic technique. Michael Reichman on The Luminous Landscape writes at length how, as digital cameras and lenses resolution continues to increase, the demands on the technical skills of the photographers increase also to make full use of the capabilities of the better sensors.
Shay, I think IS is a great advance in telephoto lens technology. For a modest sum, IS allows you to shoot in far lower light, ( much cheaper and much lighter than building two fstop faster lenses optically), and allows much slower shutter speeds as a result.
For example, this poor shot of a robin was shot resting on a bench this evening after sundown, at f9 and 1/13th of a second. The lens focal length is 700mm. That's right, 700mm at 1/13th of a second. I did use a Better Beamer at -2/3s EC to brighten things up a bit. But the basic exposure was available light. 1/13 sec at 700mm. Do you think I could have done that handheld without IS? Check the lack of a secondary image in the feathers and the eye. The beak is blurry due to movement of the beak from singing while the shutter was open. 1/13th second......
Is IS necessary for landscape photography? - probably not - but it sure is great for teles and wildlife shots.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
ian
I am not sure who you are asking Ian. Shay's profile lists a 20D. I was shooting with a 1 Series Canon.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Ian
a while ago i lost a little rubber foot to my manfrotto tripod. no biggie, but i want to replace it. i found their phone number for parts, added it to ian's info thread above. pkg of 3, $2.75. prolly a good thing to just 'have' around.
andy
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Sweet. I need one for the monopod--ground the original through. Now it's
got dirt inside
my spare parts just arrived from bogen they told me about a month, they were out of them... very cool, now i have one to replace, and two more i can lose
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
you should add some resources for good tripod heads and camera/lens plates to that section as well....
heres a few good links
Thom Hogan article on support
http://www.bythom.com/support.htm
Really Right Stuff: ballheads, L-plates and other inovative products.. plus lots of great information
http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/
Kirk Photo: ballheads, L-plates etc
http://www.kirkphoto.com/
others to include would be Markins, Arca Swiss and Arcatech maybe?
20D | 300D-IR | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 18-55 | 50 f/1.8 II | 70-200 f/4L | 17-40L | Lensbaby 2.0 | 250D | 550ex | Gitzo 1257 | RRS BH-40 | RRS L-plates
The Blog | The Photos
I'll take a look at that later this weekend.
Ian