Andy's Un-Official Unsolicited Mac Advice Thread

1127128130132133153

Comments

  • PupatorPupator Registered Users Posts: 2,322 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Andy wrote:
    Once again, what is usually such a trauma for "those other guys" is a painless simple thing for us. Mac just makes it easy.
    rolleyes1.gif

    Andy, you must avoid the rest of the internet (and reality) at all costs. Plenty of problems abound with SL upgrades - including the one you mentioned: outdated Flash that opens users to a security hole.

    Some light reading for you: deal.gif
    http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-whats-broken-for-you/
    http://www.tuaw.com/2009/08/31/my-snow-leopard-casualties/
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/171129/snow_leopard_users_4_biggest_gripes.html?tk=rss_main

    My SL upgrade went fine, and I wouldn't have cared to post this except, in typical Mac user fashion, you can't go two minutes without voicing your superiority over Windows users. Ya'll say stuff like this so often I often wonder if you're trying to convince us, or yourselves? rolleyes1.gifrofl
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Pupator wrote:
    rolleyes1.gif

    Andy, you must avoid the rest of the internet (and reality) at all costs. Plenty of problems abound with SL upgrades - including the one you mentioned: outdated Flash that opens users to a security hole.

    Some light reading for you: deal.gif
    http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-whats-broken-for-you/
    http://www.tuaw.com/2009/08/31/my-snow-leopard-casualties/
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/171129/snow_leopard_users_4_biggest_gripes.html?tk=rss_main

    My SL upgrade went fine, and I wouldn't have cared to post this except, in typical Mac user fashion, you can't go two minutes without voicing your superiority over Windows users. Ya'll say stuff like this so often I often wonder if you're trying to convince us, or yourselves? rolleyes1.gifrofl

    I'd hardly call that plenty of problems. There are some apps that aren't compatible, but it's relatively few in the big picture, IMO.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Pupator wrote:
    rolleyes1.gif

    Andy, you must avoid the rest of the internet (and reality) at all costs. Plenty of problems abound with SL upgrades - including the one you mentioned: outdated Flash that opens users to a security hole.

    Some light reading for you: deal.gif
    http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-whats-broken-for-you/
    http://www.tuaw.com/2009/08/31/my-snow-leopard-casualties/
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/171129/snow_leopard_users_4_biggest_gripes.html?tk=rss_main

    My SL upgrade went fine, and I wouldn't have cared to post this except, in typical Mac user fashion, you can't go two minutes without voicing your superiority over Windows users. Ya'll say stuff like this so often I often wonder if you're trying to convince us, or yourselves? rolleyes1.gifrofl
    It's a problem to go to Adobe.com and hit update? Haha.

    This was a cinch.

    And, hey - this is a MAC Thread :D I don't go into the Windows thread and try and talk smack there, do I? rolleyes1.gif
  • PupatorPupator Registered Users Posts: 2,322 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    DavidTO wrote:
    I'd hardly call that plenty of problems. There are some apps that aren't compatible, but it's relatively few in the big picture, IMO.

    David, there could be 4,453,768 problems and you'd still "hardly call that plenty of problems." You're the biggest Mac fanboy I've ever seen. Here's more for you: http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1337

    rolleyes1.gifrofl
    Andy wrote:
    And, hey - this is a MAC Thread :D I don't go into the Windows thread and try and talk smack there, do I? rolleyes1.gif
    ne_nau.gif
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=674991&postcount=20
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=728657&postcount=188
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=756134&postcount=245
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=783909&postcount=283


    (For those who might take this too seriously - it's all in good fun. I use both PCs and Macs. Andy and David are long-time helpful internet "friends." No harm intended.)
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Pupator wrote:
    David, there could be 4,453,768 problems and you'd still "hardly call that plenty of problems." You're the biggest Mac fanboy I've ever seen.

    rolleyes1.gifrofl


    ne_nau.gif
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=674991&postcount=20
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=728657&postcount=188
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=756134&postcount=245
    http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=783909&postcount=283


    (For those who might take this too seriously - it's all in good fun. I use both PCs and Macs. Andy and David are long-time helpful internet "friends." No harm intended.)
    All of my friends (and co-workers, we're 100% Mac here at Smuggy) have 0 problems with SL.

    But I have dozens and dozens of friends that are still scarred for live over their Vista "upgrade" and other Win OS updates.

    Nuff said naughty.gif
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Pupator wrote:
    David, there could be 4,453,768 problems and you'd still "hardly call that plenty of problems." You're the biggest Mac fanboy I've ever seen.

    rolleyes1.gifrofl


    Dude, I looked through the links you posted and I'm just saying: for a major OS update the problems are few, and they all seem to be centered around 3rd party incompatibilities. Just doesn't seem like that big a deal.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • W.W. WebsterW.W. Webster Registered Users Posts: 3,204 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Andy wrote:
    Oops! I do go to the Windows thread and post lol3.gif
    I consider those to be evangelical "missions" blbl.gif
    Many have long considered you to be doing God's work! :D
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Many have long considered you to be doing God's work! :D
    http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/08/sneak-pic-from-itablet-keynote.html
  • Miguel DelinquentoMiguel Delinquento Registered Users Posts: 904 Major grins
    edited September 4, 2009
    Tonight's story
    I'm in the mood to pile on Windows. For good reason.

    Here's my experience tonight.

    I recently purchased a used telescope for my family. It's about 8 years old, a very popular Meade ETX 90. It has a computerized controller that takes you on guided tours of the universe nightly. Very cool.

    Anyway I noticed that the firmware of the handheld controller ROM is at version 22 and the current version is 43, so i figured it was time to upgrade. The challenge was the hardware connections from the controller to any computer. The controller has an "old-style" single serial connection as you would find in a telephone jack. To connect to a modern PC or Mac I had to purchase a special serial-to-DB9 cable, and then a separate DB9-to-USB cable, which in turn plugs into the computer.

    I loaded the cable drivers on the PC, followed the manufacturer's directions, and used the official Windows-only (XP) application. No matter what I did I just couldn't get the connection between the PC and the controller to stay good enough for the upload. In fact, it failed in the middle, rendering the controller unusable.

    I then entered panic mode and did furious research on how to restore the controller to some usable state. Some forum posts say the ROM has to be in this folder, no no, the one above it and so on. Some brands of cable just don't work well on PCs, or is it their driver?

    In my research, I discovered that a kind soul created a stripped down Mac version a few years ago that only installed the upgraded ROM file (unlike the Windows version that promised to install third party databases of even more heavenly bodies and perhaps heaven itself).

    So I moved the scope and controller over to the Mac side of the room, installed the serial cable drivers on the Mac, and really felt that this serial-to-DB9-to-USB spaghetti situation was very un-Maclike. But what did I have to lose? I was desperate. The kids would be broken hearted if I broke the telescope hours before our last camping trip before school, to the high desert with clear skies.

    So I plugged in the USB end, fired up the one-click application, and low and behold the thing worked. Just like that. No drama. And done.

    And we leave for our camping trip in a few hours with star charts and smiles.

    Macs rule.



    M
  • cabbeycabbey Registered Users Posts: 1,053 Major grins
    edited September 4, 2009
    Andy wrote:
    we're 100% Mac here at Smuggy

    Does it still count if they took the mac hardware, installed vista on it, and never boot it up to OS/X? ne_nau.gif

    'cause we gots at least one of "those" kinds of "mac users" I'm afraid to report. :puke
    SmugMug Sorcerer - Engineering Team Champion for Commerce, Finance, Security, and Data Support
    http://wall-art.smugmug.com/
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 4, 2009
    cabbey wrote:
    Does it still count if they took the mac hardware, installed vista on it, and never boot it up to OS/X? ne_nau.gif

    'cause we gots at least one of "those" kinds of "mac users" I'm afraid to report. :puke
    Shoot me on a technicality. OK 98 and 44/100s percent pure then :D
  • W.W. WebsterW.W. Webster Registered Users Posts: 3,204 Major grins
    edited September 4, 2009
    cabbey wrote:
    Does it still count if they took the mac hardware, installed vista on it, and never boot it up to OS/X? ne_nau.gif
    Sounds oxymoronic to me! :D
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited September 5, 2009
    Sounds oxymoronic to me! :D

    Well, maybe without the oxy. lol3.gif
  • W.W. WebsterW.W. Webster Registered Users Posts: 3,204 Major grins
    edited September 5, 2009
    Richard wrote:
    Well, maybe without the oxy. lol3.gif
    It seemed more than a little pathetic, but I was trying to keep some decorum befitting the cultured folks for whom this forum exists! mwink.gif
  • BradfordBennBradfordBenn Registered Users Posts: 2,506 Major grins
    edited September 6, 2009
    Time for a question
    So I did the Snow Leopard upgrade last night/this morning (insomniac). So far so good, except for a few little things. The one that has me puzzled is this one:

    The battery status in the corner of my MacBook Pro says "Service Battery: The battery isn’t functioning normally, and you may or may not notice a change in its behavior or the amount of charge it holds. Have your computer checked by an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP). You can continue to use your battery before it’s checked without harming your computer."

    So the question is, how real is this or is it a ploy to get me to buy a new battery?

    Thanks

    Now where did I put that serial number.....
    -=Bradford

    Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
  • Miguel DelinquentoMiguel Delinquento Registered Users Posts: 904 Major grins
    edited September 6, 2009

    [deleted]

    So the question is, how real is this or is it a ploy to get me to buy a new battery?

    Thanks

    Now where did I put that serial number.....
    The question is: how old is your battery and how much use do you put it through? If it is more than two years old then most likely it's time for a new one. I just replaced one for an original MacBook.

    M
  • colourboxcolourbox Registered Users Posts: 2,095 Major grins
    edited September 6, 2009
    Go into System Profiler, click Power, and look at the numbers there. If your Cycle Count is above 300 or your Full Charge Capacity is getting to be a small a fraction of the original, then the warning alert is not a scam...your battery would be getting old. The utility CoconutBattery tells me that my battery started out at 5600 mAh, but can currently be charged to 4740 mAh or 84% of original capacity.

    The battery health warning is probably just a user-friendly way of translating those numbers into a reasonable alert.

    Calibrating the laptop's power manager can sometimes restore some capacity if the battery meter has gotten out of sync with the battery's actual capacity.
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 6, 2009
    Actually, System Profiler will say Check Battery if there's an issue with it. This message or the one you're getting in the menu are an indication that the battery is reporting a problem. I would replace it. And make sure you recycle the old one! thumb.gif
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • BradfordBennBradfordBenn Registered Users Posts: 2,506 Major grins
    edited September 7, 2009
    So i reinstalled the iStat Pro widget and it also says the health is at 51%. The plus side is that I thought that my AppleCare had run out last month, it turns out it runs out next August. So it looks like this will be covered clap.gif
    -=Bradford

    Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 7, 2009
    So i reinstalled the iStat Pro widget and it also says the health is at 51%. The plus side is that I thought that my AppleCare had run out last month, it turns out it runs out next August. So it looks like this will be covered clap.gif

    Unless it's a defect, Applecare doesn't cover it, as it's a consumable part. If it fails before 300 cycles they will most likely replace under warranty. Other than that, no.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited September 8, 2009
    We are trying to redistribute a CD that has a Mac and PC programs on it. I used Mac's Disk Utility to create a .cdr file, and then burned that image to the CD-R. Disk Utility settings used were
    Image Format: DVD/CD Master
    Encryption: None.

    The .cdr file was created on the desktop, and I burned that to a CD-R

    All Macs can read the disk and see the DMG file. PCs, however, just see a desktop.ini file. headscratch.gif
  • Miguel DelinquentoMiguel Delinquento Registered Users Posts: 904 Major grins
    edited September 8, 2009
    ISO format
    For mixed platform requirements I use Toast to burn a standard ISO format disc. I would think that Disc Utility has a similar format option.

    M

    RogersDA wrote:
    We are trying to redistribute a CD that has a Mac and PC programs on it. I used Mac's Disk Utility to create a .cdr file, and then burned that image to the CD-R. Disk Utility settings used were
    Image Format: DVD/CD Master
    Encryption: None.

    The .cdr file was created on the desktop, and I burned that to a CD-R

    All Macs can read the disk and see the DMG file. PCs, however, just see a desktop.ini file. headscratch.gif
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited September 8, 2009
    For mixed platform requirements I use Toast to burn a standard ISO format disc. I would think that Disc Utility has a similar format option.

    M
    If the option is there then I couldn't find it. At any rate, Toast was ordered this morning.
  • Miguel DelinquentoMiguel Delinquento Registered Users Posts: 904 Major grins
    edited September 8, 2009
    In Disk Utility>File>New Disc>Blank Disc Image
    In the dialog box where you title the disc, go to the partition drop down menu and choose the last item>single partition CD/DVD ISO

    That's all.

    M
    RogersDA wrote:
    If the option is there then I couldn't find it. At any rate, Toast was ordered this morning.
  • BradfordBennBradfordBenn Registered Users Posts: 2,506 Major grins
    edited September 9, 2009
    DavidTO wrote:
    Unless it's a defect, Applecare doesn't cover it, as it's a consumable part. If it fails before 300 cycles they will most likely replace under warranty. Other than that, no.

    I have called and after a quick check it looks like it will be covered...

    Health Information:
    Cycle count: 178
    Condition: Check Battery
    -=Bradford

    Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 9, 2009
    I have called and after a quick check it looks like it will be covered...

    Health Information:
    Cycle count: 178
    Condition: Check Battery


    Great!

    I had one replace at 299 cycles! lol3.gif That's when they told me 300 was the cut-off. They also saw some slight swelling in the battery, as well, which I think helped my case.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • patch29patch29 Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,928 Major grins
    edited September 16, 2009
    What is everyone using for password management between a mac and an iphone?

    I was going to try 1password, but I cannot access their site today. ne_nau.gif

    Are there any other apps that work as well?
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 16, 2009
    patch29 wrote:
    What is everyone using for password management between a mac and an iphone?

    I was going to try 1password, but I cannot access their site today. ne_nau.gif

    Are there any other apps that work as well?


    Wait for 1P. They'll be back up, and they're the way to go, IMO.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Sign In or Register to comment.