Ahhhh That New Camera Smell :) Canon 1Ds Mark III

2»

Comments

  • patch29patch29 Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,928 Major grins
    edited November 30, 2007
    Andy wrote:
    Oh it's the very same plate - and that's how you'd access that other panel then deal.gif

    but the old plate fits, you just loose some accessibility.

    ian408 wrote:
    mkII plate won't work. At least not for the 1dMkIII.


    Now I am confused, but I think it works just not 100%.

    Does the new plate allow access to the USB holder in normal mounting or only when it is moved over an inch or so?
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 30, 2007
    Fantastic!. Enjoy the new camera.

    Please post some pics ASAP.
    Mitch
    http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited November 30, 2007
    patch29 wrote:
    but the old plate fits, you just loose some accessibility.





    Now I am confused, but I think it works just not 100%.

    Does the new plate allow access to the USB holder in normal mounting or only when it is moved over an inch or so?
    new plate works 100% fine on Canon 1Ds Mark III.
    Andy

    Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited November 30, 2007
    So we ever gonna see any pictures from this thing, or are you gonna sit there and yak about it all day? deal.gifmwink.gifrofl
    Moderator of Landscapes forum
    Link to my Smugmug site
  • PicGirlPicGirl Registered Users Posts: 21 Big grins
    edited November 30, 2007
    I'm Still On A Waiting List At Ritz Camera. Anyone Heard When Their Shipment Is Supposed To Come In? I'm Dyin' With Envy Here!:(:
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,940 moderator
    edited November 30, 2007
    Andy wrote:
    new plate works 100% fine on Canon 1Ds Mark III.

    And the 1dmkII plate does not work on the 1dmkIII.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • nightspidynightspidy Registered Users Posts: 177 Major grins
    edited December 1, 2007
    Congrats!!!
    Can't wait to see pics-you are so lucky!!! bowdown.gif
    Canon 30D & REB XT (thinking of converting to infrared), Sigma 10-20mm, Tammy 17-50mm 2.8, Canon 24-70mm 2.8, 70-200mm 2.8 IS, Tokina 100mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 1.4 ext, and Sigma 4.5 fish eye along with a Bogen by Gitzo Tripod, Manfrotto Ball Head, MacBook PRO, several HOYA filters and a 2GB & 8GB San Disk, 160GB Sanho storage device (really cool btw)......wishing for a Canon 100-400mm. :wink
  • photobugphotobug Registered Users Posts: 633 Major grins
    edited December 1, 2007
    nightspidy wrote:
    Can't wait to see pics-you are so lucky!!!
    Somehow, I suspect that "luck" had little to do with Andy's success thumb.gif.
    Canon EOS 7D ........ 24-105 f/4L | 50 f/1.4 | 70-200 f/2.8L IS + 1.4x II TC ........ 580EX
    Supported by: Benro C-298 Flexpod tripod, MC96 monopod, Induro PHQ1 head
    Also play with: studio strobes, umbrellas, softboxes, ...and a partridge in a pear tree...
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited December 2, 2007
    Congrats Andy :)
  • borrowlenses.comborrowlenses.com Registered Users Posts: 441 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2007
    Well for those of you who can't quite swing the 8 grand, we picked one up as well :)

    http://www.borrowlenses.com/product/canon_bodies/1Ds_MkIII

    The sad thing is that it's still sitting in the box as I have WAY too much work to do :cry The box sure looks nice though :D
    http://www.BorrowLenses.com
    Your professional online camera gear rental store

    Follow us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/borrowlenses
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,940 moderator
    edited December 3, 2007
    borrowlenses.com wrote:
    Well for those of you who can't quite swing the 8 grand, we picked one up as well :)

    http://www.borrowlenses.com/product/canon_bodies/1Ds_MkIII

    The sad thing is that it's still sitting in the box as I have WAY too much work to do :cry The box sure looks nice though :D
    Be right over to, ah, help you out :D
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • borrowlenses.comborrowlenses.com Registered Users Posts: 441 Major grins
    edited December 3, 2007
    ian408 wrote:
    Be right over to, ah, help you out :D

    Hahaha, I am sure you can even help me carry it...to your car? :D
    http://www.BorrowLenses.com
    Your professional online camera gear rental store

    Follow us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/borrowlenses
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,940 moderator
    edited December 3, 2007
    borrowlenses.com wrote:
    Hahaha, I am sure you can even help me carry it...to your car? :D
    Oh no. I'd carry it to my motorcycle lol3.gif
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • patch29patch29 Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,928 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2007
    I wonder how this lens looks compared to the Canon 24 TSE on the 1Ds mkIII? deal.gif

    Schneider Wide Angle 28mm f/2.8 PC Super-Angulon Manual Focus SLR Lens for Canon EOS
    Mfr# 06039789CE • B&H# SC2828PCSACA
    Price: $ 2,018.95
  • borrowlenses.comborrowlenses.com Registered Users Posts: 441 Major grins
    edited December 4, 2007
    ian408 wrote:
    Oh no. I'd carry it to my motorcycle lol3.gif

    Hahaha, I am not sure how much you paid for that motorcylce or how much you value your life, but if it was me, I could safely say that the 1Ds III would be the most valuable thing that's ever ridden on my bike :D
    http://www.BorrowLenses.com
    Your professional online camera gear rental store

    Follow us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/borrowlenses
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2007
    Canon 1Ds Mark III, ISO 3200, 1/6th second @ f/4. Handheld with Canon 24-105L on board. No processing.

    Exif

    Click the photo to see the original (warning, large file).

    231445249-X2.jpg

    Straightened and sharpened version, here.
    Andy

    Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
  • PindyPindy Registered Users Posts: 1,089 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2007
    Wow—amazing detail and such low noise. You have to see the original size to discern any at all.
  • jdryan3jdryan3 Registered Users Posts: 1,353 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2007
    Pindy wrote:
    Wow—amazing detail and such low noise. You have to see the original size to discern any at all.

    I agree. Out of camera is great at that ISO and handheld, but 'fixed' version is really nice.
    "Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. Oh well."
    -Fleetwood Mac
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited December 12, 2007
    Oh wow! I am blown away at how rich and full the tonality is at ISO 3200. There is such a feeling of warmth in the wood and the image grain is so nicely filmic.

    I do wonder what sort of lighting produced these results?

    We are living in wonderful times.

    Thanks for sharing this Andy,
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • RhuarcRhuarc Registered Users Posts: 1,464 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2007
    Ouch. This makes me looka t the ISO 1600 out of my XTi as total and utter crap! LoL... But I suppse a difference of $7500 should buy you something! LoL
    Photos | Blog | Twitter | Gear
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 12, 2007
    ziggy53 wrote:
    I do wonder what sort of lighting produced these results?

    Indoors, Fort Point under the Golden Gate Bridge. It was rather dark, really. There were a few shafts of light, as you can see though. You can see by my exif, kinda how dark it was, 1/6th @ f/4 :)
    Andy

    Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited December 12, 2007
    Andy wrote:
    Indoors, Fort Point under the Golden Gate Bridge. It was rather dark, really. There were a few shafts of light, as you can see though. You can see by my exif, kinda how dark it was, 1/6th @ f/4 :)

    According to the chart here:

    http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm#Light%20Intensity%20Chart

    That is an exposure value of around 1.5, which is very low light indeed!
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Sign In or Register to comment.