Boston Time Exposure
dugmar
Registered Users Posts: 756 Major grins
10 sec. exposure of Boston from the Longfellow Bridge...
Pretty happy with this shot.
-Doug
Pretty happy with this shot.
-Doug
0
Comments
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
-Doug
Ian
my smugmug
Lynn
I shot this using my Canon Eos Digital Rebel. 10 second exposure, f/5.6, ISO 200. The time was 7PM. The overcast sky picked up the light from the city, giving the orange glow in the sky. Photo was not enhanced or altered in any way.
-Doug
Lynn
I just finished a photo class, we weren't allowed to use anything but full manual mode, so that is what I did. Just basically set ISO to 200 and balanced the shot. I was looking for a setting that would give me a 10 second exposure since that is how long it took a car to round that bend (on average.) It took me a while to get it right. I just wanted one car in the frame. Finally, one guy came driving along and I nailed it. His drivng speed was perfect, he got it to the second! He filled the bend in the road perfectly. If you look carefully, you will see the start of another car entering the turn, not too obvious though.
I am in Byfield, up by Newburyport.
Doug
Lynn
Check out her stuff. She is opening a studio very soon.
http://www.fmcphotobydesign.com
-Doug
Dave Spragg
New England School of Photography's spring classes start in the next two weeks. I signed up for Digital Portraiture. I'd actually rather take something on composition, but for the first class I thought it'd be good to take something that focused on digital techniques -- particularly post-processing. (Have to see if they really need Photoshop CS; hope not, that's a lot of money.)
You don't need 2000 classes. If the stuff you've been shooting was all untrained, you have a good eye to start with. Classes would probably help you figure out why the good ones are good, and that'll help you do it more consistently, but you've got a good baseline.
jimf@frostbytes.com
I'm surprised at how little noise there seems to be at ISO 200. Just curious, why did you choose 200, if you wanted long exposures?
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the photo appear to be more grainy in a higher speed ASA? Is that what you mean by "noise"?
200 usually gets me the most crisp looking images, so I am confused by your question, but eager to learn what you meant.
Thanks,
Doug