"Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston "The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
These two, BY FAR, are my fave's of rutt's, with the second being my favorite of them all. Mr. Savannah (Here he comes! Mi-ster Sa-va-ha-nah!), I most like your first shot. Dangermonkey. Oops.. I have impulse control issues.. sorry. dangermonkey. SORRY!
Youth and Enthusiasm
Are No Match For
Age and Treachery
Many of my first photographs were flowers. I don't see anything wrong with learning on them. For one thing, the fact they are pretty will keep you interested long enough to get good with the camera.
These two, BY FAR, are my fave's of rutt's, with the second being my favorite of them all. Mr. Savannah (Here he comes! Mi-ster Sa-va-ha-nah!), I most like your first shot. Dangermonkey. Oops.. I have impulse control issues.. sorry. dangermonkey. SORRY!
I have found very mild self induced electro-shock therapy to assist with my impulse control issues. I just stick a 9-volt on my eye for a minute. It helps.
It appears I need to put in about 50,000 more practice shots. My god people, where do you learn this stuff¿?¿? (you'd think people did this for a living or something...)
Many of my first photographs were flowers. I don't see anything wrong with learning on them. For one thing, the fact they are pretty will keep you interested long enough to get good with the camera.
Regards, Eric
Yes, many of my best flower pictures come from a period about 3 years ago when I was getting serious about digital photography. At that time I had an Olympus E10 and the macro attachment. I got really good results; the DOF of the smaller sensor really works for macro shots. Also, I fixated on flower shots. I'm still really interested in flower shots, but it takes a special situation to motivate me now, like a late October snow. But flower photography is a deep topic and cannot really be exhausted. Irving Penn (probably my second all time favorite, after Cartier-Bresson) published a ravising book of flowers in 1980:
This book is a real revalation for anyone who has ever spent time shooting flowers. I wish I could have found some online images. I don't want to violate Penn's copyrights, so I won't post scans from mine. Suffice to say you should buy this book if you can. It's out of print, but not rare; amazon has 12 listings for "new & used".
If you get bored taking photographs of flowers, you can always get into making radiographs of them. The work of Dr. Dain Tasker can really change the way you see flowers:
I did find some images of Tasker's online. Take a look. There is at least one book of Tasker's work, but it is out of print and rarer than the Penn book. Amazon does list 2 under new&used. Search Amazon for "Dain Tasker".
Digging around in my own archives, I did find a few more worth posting from my golden flower period taken with that E10 (although they look pretty bland compared to Penn and Tasker):
Anyway, all this flower discussion has me looking forward to spring here in Newton, MA. It helped me figure out something. The E10 was very forgiving for this kind of photograph. Even with the macro lens, I could shoot handheld photographs and get acceptable depth of field. Now I have a 100mm macro lens for my 10D and the depth of field is very shallow. So I have to stop it way down to get the depth of field I want. But then I need a long exposure and a tripod. And the slightest wind makes it impossible to shoot. So maybe I have to rethink this approach. Might be an excuse for a Canon Pro1 or similar. (Wonder what used E10s are going for on ebay?)
And the slightest wind makes it impossible to shoot. So maybe I have to rethink this approach. Might be an excuse for a Canon Pro1 or similar. (Wonder what used E10s are going for on ebay?)
I'm sure you've seen the device that stretches like an arm from your tripod leg, to grip and hold steady a flower? I haven't the time to look for it now, saw it at an online store a few weeks ago.
I'm sure you've seen the device that stretches like an arm from your tripod leg, to grip and hold steady a flower? I haven't the time to look for it now, saw it at an online store a few weeks ago.
Thanks, no I didn't know about these. They are cheap (<$50). But it's no substitute for being able to handold.
"Consulting the rules of composition before taking a photograph, is like consulting the laws of gravity before going for a walk." - Edward Weston "The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
I found these two roses at Shoreline Park. It's near where I live but the real reason I went was for the Rengstorff House. Lighting was bad so I wandered the small garden.
Look at the delicate petals of this white rose. So fragile.
These little guys were as fragrant a rose as I have smelled in a long time.
Ian
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
The red and pink roses seem to be more fragrant. Nice photos.
QUOTE=ian408]I found these two roses at Shoreline Park. It's near where I live but the real reason I went was for the Rengstorff House. Lighting was bad so I wandered the small garden.
Look at the delicate petals of this white rose. So fragile.
These little guys were as fragrant a rose as I have smelled in a long time.
Comments
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
I'm thinking that this is the way to shoot a flower.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Are No Match For
Age and Treachery
Regards, Eric
It appears I need to put in about 50,000 more practice shots. My god people, where do you learn this stuff¿?¿? (you'd think people did this for a living or something...)
Yes, many of my best flower pictures come from a period about 3 years ago when I was getting serious about digital photography. At that time I had an Olympus E10 and the macro attachment. I got really good results; the DOF of the smaller sensor really works for macro shots. Also, I fixated on flower shots. I'm still really interested in flower shots, but it takes a special situation to motivate me now, like a late October snow. But flower photography is a deep topic and cannot really be exhausted. Irving Penn (probably my second all time favorite, after Cartier-Bresson) published a ravising book of flowers in 1980:
This book is a real revalation for anyone who has ever spent time shooting flowers. I wish I could have found some online images. I don't want to violate Penn's copyrights, so I won't post scans from mine. Suffice to say you should buy this book if you can. It's out of print, but not rare; amazon has 12 listings for "new & used".
If you get bored taking photographs of flowers, you can always get into making radiographs of them. The work of Dr. Dain Tasker can really change the way you see flowers:
I did find some images of Tasker's online. Take a look. There is at least one book of Tasker's work, but it is out of print and rarer than the Penn book. Amazon does list 2 under new&used. Search Amazon for "Dain Tasker".
Digging around in my own archives, I did find a few more worth posting from my golden flower period taken with that E10 (although they look pretty bland compared to Penn and Tasker):
Anyway, all this flower discussion has me looking forward to spring here in Newton, MA. It helped me figure out something. The E10 was very forgiving for this kind of photograph. Even with the macro lens, I could shoot handheld photographs and get acceptable depth of field. Now I have a 100mm macro lens for my 10D and the depth of field is very shallow. So I have to stop it way down to get the depth of field I want. But then I need a long exposure and a tripod. And the slightest wind makes it impossible to shoot. So maybe I have to rethink this approach. Might be an excuse for a Canon Pro1 or similar. (Wonder what used E10s are going for on ebay?)
Great shots guys. Here one of mine from yesterday.
TML Photography
tmlphoto.com
I'm sure you've seen the device that stretches like an arm from your tripod leg, to grip and hold steady a flower? I haven't the time to look for it now, saw it at an online store a few weeks ago.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Here's one more.
ISO 200
F/4 1/10 sec hand held with IS lens
A little photoshop
TML Photography
tmlphoto.com
I guess these would qualify as flower shots:
M7
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
The Lily, taken with my 3100.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Just beautiful, 'finder. A really nice image.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
This is fun.
Look at the delicate petals of this white rose. So fragile.
These little guys were as fragrant a rose as I have smelled in a long time.
Ian
QUOTE=ian408]I found these two roses at Shoreline Park. It's near where I live but the real reason I went was for the Rengstorff House. Lighting was bad so I wandered the small garden.
Look at the delicate petals of this white rose. So fragile.
These little guys were as fragrant a rose as I have smelled in a long time.
Ian[/QUOTE]