If you're not fond of HDR's, what ya think of this new trend...
EphTwoEight
Registered Users Posts: 552 Major grins
The 'Tilt Shift' effect?
I think they are the stupidest looking pictures ever. Hope not to offend anyone, but this is LAME-O!!
http://www.tiltshiftphotography.net/images/tutorial-images/15-voila.jpg
(Mod edit, changed image to link.)
I think they are the stupidest looking pictures ever. Hope not to offend anyone, but this is LAME-O!!
http://www.tiltshiftphotography.net/images/tutorial-images/15-voila.jpg
(Mod edit, changed image to link.)
0
Comments
http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=30850
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
I'm not quite sure what the point is, to make a post like this? I don't care for Michael Bolton, but I don't go around slamming him, either.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Well, others post their HDR's and all people do is interject their opinion of what they think of the process, rather than the photo it self.:
If it's done right and thrown in sparingly, I think it's fine.
The Canon 45mm TS-E
All of these focus effects are in camera, theres a lot more to tilt shift then just making things look small.
more here: http://www.ogle.co.nz/gallery/2590831_xJDGf#252575350_56cXx
I am not a Michael bolton fan either BUT sometime good music is Just that Good music
All the best
Chris
www.longislandimage.com
:whip
WWW.LONGISLANDIMAGE.COM
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork
Miniatures, like the one you posted, are not my cup of tea in general. I like them more when the scene is familiar, in which case it can sometimes look cool. But again, success depends on being appropriate. I would never consider shooting a portrait of my mother that way, but it might be just perfect for an eye-catching advertisement. In the end, it's just another tool in the kit.
So that makes this slam ok? If we all jump off a bridge, will you follow? Just pointing out the flawed logic here. Yes, the post is offensive.
I don't personally care for the orignal image, but that's just my opinion. By the same token, some of the others are kind of cool in their way. It's a matter of taste & what the artist's intent was.
A more constructive tack on the thought is this: ANY process overdone will look bad, tilt-shift, HDR, sharpening, etc. Anyone remember all the way-oversharpened images a few years back when everyone was discovering Photoshop & digital imaging? The idea is to achieve Chip Foose's ideal when he's customizing a car: you see it & know something has been doen, but you cannot figure out exactly what. It's all about subtlety.
http://www.chrislaudermilkphoto.com/
I kinda like the effect, better than HDR which is WAY overdone most of the time IMO.
http://silversx80.smugmug.com/
Olympus E-M5, 12-50mm, 45mm f/1.8
Some legacy OM lenses and an OM-10
recreating in photoshop, meh.
wow, im nearly speechless....
you hope not to offend anyone, but your mouth needs to open at some point?
seriously....
he he he
What in the world do you think you are going to do when you have to preface any comment "Not to offend"? Either own up and mean to offend or keep your mouth shut.
And if you are offended, it was intentional.
I like 'em. Not something I'd spend any time doing personally, but they look pretty cool, when done well.
Please refrain from personal attacks.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
But can we continue the attacks on Michael Bolton?
New York Times Photo Sports
He shot the Pipeline Masters, US Open Tennis, World Series, Kentucky Derby, Superbowl, etc -- all via a T&S.
T&S might not be for everyone, but looking at these images and listening to him speak provides his thoughts on why he shot using a T&S and why he believes it works.
Personally, I was very impressed by his work and one day, I'll will try it. He did it from the stands along with everyone all the fans and not from the special press box. It gives me hope that I can too produce great (and interesting) work in the bleachers.
It would be a sad day, in deed, for music if we couldn't attack Michael Bolton. :bwg
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
hehehe, This is one of the only portraits I have of my mother....
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork
Charlie
Well done too...very appealing shot.:D
When I grow up, I wanna be just like you, Ziggy!
Thanks Gus, but I shoot LF, and use the tilts, drop and rise all the time. But without the intent of making the subject look like a toy train set.
The T/S lens for the DSLR is a cool tool, and would like to try one sometime. And the countless samples of this fine art I've seen lately have all been squished in PS.