Options

Help spend my money

2»

Comments

  • Options
    Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited July 10, 2008
    I'm thinking that the 16 - 35 is out of range. $1800cdn, eligible for a $200 rebate. Think I am better off with the 17 - 40 AND either the 100 macro or the 1.4 TC. The TS kinda scares me!

    Okay, here is my last question - since tomorrow i will be picking up the printer and drooling over lenses.

    Is the TS suitable for architecture and close street shots? I think I missed the 17mm- 24mm range that I used to have with the 17 - 85mm when in Washington and again in Chicago

    ann
  • Options
    davevdavev Registered Users Posts: 3,118 Major grins
    edited July 10, 2008
    Ann, looking at your lens line up, other than the macro ability, I wouldn't think that you need another lens
    at the 100mm size.

    You already have an 85mm, 135mm, and the 70-200 zoom.
    The macro is really a one trick pony for your lineup.

    Maybe a set of extension tubes would be a better way to go. ( LINK )

    Although using these may not be quite as good as a dedicated macro lens, they can be used with every lens you have.
    ( I haven't used any tubes, just going by what I've read )

    So, if I'm spending your money, I'm buying a set of tubes, the 17-40L, a 1.4 TC.

    Although you might miss out on some of the canon rebates this way, the total cost will be less,
    and you'll be gaining macro ability, a wide angle, and your 300 becomes a 420.
    dave.

    Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
  • Options
    Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited July 10, 2008
    davev wrote:
    Ann, looking at your lens line up, other than the macro ability, I wouldn't think that you need another lens
    at the 100mm size.

    You already have an 85mm, 135mm, and the 70-200 zoom.
    The macro is really a one trick pony for your lineup.

    Maybe a set of extension tubes would be a better way to go. ( LINK )

    Although using these may not be quite as good as a dedicated macro lens, they can be used with every lens you have.
    ( I haven't used any tubes, just going by what I've read )

    So, if I'm spending your money, I'm buying a set of tubes, the 17-40L, a 1.4 TC.

    Although you might miss out on some of the canon rebates this way, the total cost will be less,
    and you'll be gaining macro ability, a wide angle, and your 300 becomes a 420.

    You are absolutely right. I am contemplating selling the 85mm. My boss wants to start shooting indoor soccer and dance and I don't anymore. I just guided him through buying the 40d rather than the XT, and implied that the 85 migh be available.

    Hadn't thought of extension tubes. Verrrrry interesting! mwink.gif
  • Options
    DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    Ann,

    The TS is designed for architecture.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • Options
    Marc MuenchMarc Muench Registered Users Posts: 1,420 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    show me the moneydeal.gif
    nice avatar dudeclap.gif
  • Options
    TangoTango Registered Users Posts: 4,592 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    marc, why thank ya, ive been trying to decide on one....and since thats one of my better captures i say why not:ivar

    ann, i think you may not see this before you go to the store....but if so let me just say, good luck! deciding on lenses is a bugger.....

    i have had 6 different lenses, and if i was to only have one, it would be the T/S due to the fact most of my photog is architecture or vast expanse wilderness....

    so think about what your going to need more....

    in reading your posts i think you want to go into macro...i say do it!
    Aaron Nelson
  • Options
    mackidbrendanmackidbrendan Registered Users Posts: 85 Big grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    Ann McRae wrote:
    Cypress Hills/Medicine Hat for summer games and landscape shooting. Any recommendations for locations?

    ann

    awesome.
    well i would say that u deffinaltely need to snap some pics of the biggest teepee in the world, i thinkheadscratch.gif . and the going into the city, from the west, there is quite a view from the bridge.
    http://www.brendanryder.com

    Use coupon code 4MdT6vueeZfpQ to save 5$ on a smugmug account
  • Options
    Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    What, besides 17 - 24mm range does the 17 - 40 get me? If I'm looking for that range, would the 17 - 55 f2.8 be better?

    Is there a prime that would be good instead?

    Oh Major confusion. And intimidation about the Tilt Shift.

    Still haven't gone shopping - too many chores.

    ann
  • Options
    DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    Ann McRae wrote:
    What, besides 17 - 24mm range does the 17 - 40 get me? If I'm looking for that range, would the 17 - 55 f2.8 be better?

    Is there a prime that would be good instead?

    Oh Major confusion. And intimidation about the Tilt Shift.

    Still haven't gone shopping - too many chores.

    ann


    17-40 gets you 1d compatibility and doesn't flare as horribly as the 17-55.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • Options
    davevdavev Registered Users Posts: 3,118 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2008
    DavidTO wrote:
    17-40 gets you 1d compatibility and doesn't flare as horribly as the 17-55.

    Exactly.

    Most, if not all of the 17-50's I think are for cropped sensor cameras.
    I know my Tamron is.
    dave.

    Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
  • Options
    Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited July 12, 2008
    To the camera store and back with only the printer.

    They have the 17 - 40 in stock, but really don't think I need that.
    They have the 1.4X TC for $419 so I think I'll look for a used one.
    They have the remote shutter for $99
    They can bring the TS in, but their price is $1700 so that will be coming across the border too.

    More time to think I guess. First trip is early August.

    Thanks for your help, folks.

    ann
  • Options
    KEDKED Registered Users Posts: 843 Major grins
    edited July 17, 2008
    Ann McRae wrote:
    To the camera store and back with only the printer.

    They have the 17 - 40 in stock, but really don't think I need that.
    They have the 1.4X TC for $419 so I think I'll look for a used one.
    They have the remote shutter for $99
    They can bring the TS in, but their price is $1700 so that will be coming across the border too.

    More time to think I guess. First trip is early August.

    Thanks for your help, folks.

    ann
    I got my 1.4X at B&H for $280 less than a year ago. Either your camera store is ripping you off or this is a reflection of the deterioration of the dollar; do yourself a favor and check out all your wishlist items at B&H.

    PS is the remote shutter you refer to the Canon remote shutter release? Just got that too from B&H for $50, which I presumed to be MSRP for such a small item.
Sign In or Register to comment.