Search
-
Re: Nikon Prime for Portraits, Choices??
http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/2011/03/review-sigma-85mm-f1-4/ You may find the above of interest. He also compares the nikon 85 d to the 85 g. I just take travel and grandkids pictures, but i have used 17-55 2.8, 50 1.4 and 85 1.4 and they are all very good for portraits at events. The 17-55 2.8 and the 85 1.4 make a… -
Re: Pics of youth basketball: What I've learned about sports photography this season
50 vs 85 Not so fast on the 85 over the 50 -- it depends on where you are shooting from of course, but if you are behind the baseline under the hoop, the 50 is good out to half court (with cropping) and great from he top of the key in; I think the 85 might be too long for action right under the hoop. I have both and don't… -
Re: Long Term Planning so my gear lust doesn't break me!
From Canon the equivalent list would be 7D 17-55/2.8 IS 580EX II 85/1.2L (or 85/1.8 to save some $) 70-200/2.8 IS Comparing Canon to Nikon: Body: don't know enough about either to compare. 17-55: can't imagine there is enough difference here to decide on. Flash: The SB900 is a better unit but also more expensive 85: The… -
Re: Info bar customisation
-
Turk's-cap Lily (Lilium superbum)
-
Saint-Petersburg
-
FS: Canon 40mm 2.8 lens $85 SOLD
-
Fox portrait
-
Straight out of '85
-
SOLD: Canon 550ex and possibly 85/1.8
>3045 results