The 50D?

Scott_Quier

jeffreaux2 wrote:

:lurk

Why dont we have a "waiting for the FedEx truck smiley?

Because B&H ships using UPS? Maybe? j/k

Scott_Quier

jeffreaux2 wrote:

That is VERY encouraging news. I know my 85mm is off on my XTi. Hopefully I can dial it in and use it to its potential on the 50D.

I would like to see images/crops for sue if it isn't too much trouble.....and if you had a "before" shot....just to show how bad it was....that would be helpful as well.

Also, it would be extremely helpful to me....and probably to other dgrinners if you post a thread on your process that you went through....the method...that you used to dial it in. Maybe in Techniques?

Jeff,

As requested, here are some test shots taken with the EF 50mm f/1.4 - except as noted, all were taken at ISO 100, f/1.4 using the center focus point on Canon 50D. Also, to see the "Orignial" sized images, just click on the photo.

1. Shot about 15 feet from the fence (this being a good distance for 3/4 or full-length portraits with this lens), intent was to show that focus was acquired and provide some indication of the bokeh.


2. 100% center crop from the above photo (800x800 px)


3. 100% corner crop from the first photo (800x800 px)


4. How about CA (at f/1.4, 800x800 crops, left image is from center, right from upper left corner)


5. CA is much better as you stop down and just about gone by f/4 (f/4, 800x800 crops, left image is from center, right from upper left corner)


6. How does it do with AI-Servo? This is one of about 6 shots I took. Most were dead on (like this one), a few were front/back focused by a couple of inches. Oh, BTW - make no mistake, this is dog belongs to the DW!


7. What I was, nominally, focusing on...


8. OK, so how bad was it..... Here I was some 10' to 15' from the group, (ISO 100, f/1.4, 1.250, center focus point on daughter's hand and then re-compose). Notice that the lens front-focused about a foot or more in front of mom's foot. Pretty bad! This was taken with AF Microadjustment set at about -7. The correct setting (as shown/shot above) is +4.


Again, understand that these were all shot at f/1.4. Things improve greatly stopping down only 2/3 of a stop - it's amazing the difference that little bit of aperture makes. I don't have any examples at hand - they got tossed yesterday - sorry - just take my word for it.

Also, per you suggestion, I will be posting a "How did he dial it in so well" thread later today. I have to re-look at all my lenses to verify that they are right as they were "dialed in" using a different method and my confidence level in that job is near zero right now.

jeffreaux2

Jeff,

As requested, here are some test shots taken with the EF 50mm f/1.4 - except as noted, all were taken at ISO 100, f/1.4 using the center focus point on Canon 50D. Also, to see the "Orignial" sized images, just click on the photo.

Very Nice!!!


Thanks Scott, and now I am REAL interested!!!!:D

pathfinder

You may find this post from the Luminous Landscape quite interesting regarding the 50D.

I own both a 40D and a 50D and do not find the 50D inferior in any way despite what you read on some of the boards. This link may help explain why some folks prefer the 40D, maybe?

jeffreaux2

pathfinder wrote:

You may find this post from the Luminous Landscape quite interesting regarding the 50D.

I own both a 40D and a 50D and do not find the 50D inferior in any way despite what you read on some of the boards. This link may help explain why some folks prefer the 40D, maybe?

Hey thanks for the link.....it was an interesting read...and an interesting perspective.

As for me, I must admit that I am not much of a pixel peeper. I do, however wish that the XTi would have produced less noise at ISO 400 than it exhibited. I primarily shoot portraits and events. The noise I see in the XTi at ISO400...especially in the shadows of the skin....were a limitation for me. I am a "shoot at the lowest ISO that is practical" believer anyway, but even in the shade of a sunny afternoon ISO100 or even 200 can often result in those slower shutter speeds that can kill image quality in other ways....ie camera shake or subject movement. I am hoping that the 50D will grant me that extra stop at acceptable noise levels.

Of course...even with the XTi...at ISO 400 and even 800, the apparent noise in a print of the 5x7 or 8x10 variety was never really an issue.....but on screen...in the editor....when I SEE IT....well....like I said Id rather the extra stop.

The highlight priority feature looks interesting as well. Exposing the highlights at the next lower ISO while the remainder of the image is recorded at the chosen ISO....(if I have gotten it right). This could also open up possibilities for pushing skin tones brightness a bit more than in the past. This could be especially helpful when the subject is wearing lighter colored clothing.


And....as for the CA on Scott's 50 F1.4...well...The 85 F1.8
wide open....and in areas of high contrast.....is just as suceptable. Fortunately...as he said...stopping down a touch is a quick cure.

NeilL

some nice real photography talk here now, not that geeky number obsession huhD:D:Drofl

handsome lot, you and your family, Scott

Scott_Quier

NeilL wrote:

some nice real photography talk here now, not that geeky number obsession huhD:D:Drofl

handsome lot, you and your family, Scott

What I didn't make clear is that this shot was of a paying client and his family - not mine!


This is my family (about a year ago now):
My son


My DW (probably my favorite photo of her)

NeilL

Scott_Quier wrote:

What I didn't make clear is that this shot was of a paying client

hehe... how easy is it to kick off a comedy of errors?!

but the same comment applies, no less so for the smaller number involved

hey, is that an aussie hat atop DW

NeilL

pathfinder wrote:

You may find this post from the Luminous Landscape quite interesting regarding the 50D.

I own both a 40D and a 50D and do not find the 50D inferior in any way despite what you read on some of the boards. This link may help explain why some folks prefer the 40D, maybe?

Yes, very interesting link, pathfinder. Right at the coalface. Thanks!

Scott_Quier

NeilL wrote:

hehe... how easy is it to kick off a comedy of errors?!

but the same comment applies, no less so for the smaller number involved

hey, is that an aussie hat atop DW

Yep - genuine kangaroo hide and all. I bought it in Anchorage AK and had it for about 6 months. Then I left in a hotel room and haven't seen one since. I really miss that hat!

NeilL

Scott_Quier wrote:

Yep - genuine kangaroo hide and all. I bought it in Anchorage AK and had it for about 6 months. Then I left in a hotel room and haven't seen one since. I really miss that hat!

guess that kangaroo is still hoppin' somewhere

jeffreaux2

Scott_Quier wrote:

Yep - genuine kangaroo hide and all. I bought it in Anchorage AK and had it for about 6 months. Then I left in a hotel room and haven't seen one since. I really miss that hat!

It might be possible that a person from Australia might ship you a replacement.....that is....provided you could find that person...and he be willing to do so.

Snowgirl

Scott_Quier wrote:

Spent a considerable amount of time, figuring out a better way to getting the lens dialed in - did a modified version of the Canon recommendation.

I know what I'll be doing all day tomorrow - verifying the AF Microadjustment settings for all my lenses.

Where can I find information on "dialing in" lenses?

I just got the 50 f/1.8 and am working on learning how to focus it properly.

Thanks.

jeffreaux2

Tick Tock Tick Tock.........:D

Snowgirl

jeffreaux2 wrote:

Tick Tock Tick Tock.........:D

Congrats. Time to change your "my gear" list

jeffreaux2

Snowgirl wrote:

Where can I find information on "dialing in" lenses?

I just got the 50 f/1.8 and am working on learning how to focus it properly.

Thanks.

The 50mm F1.8 CAN be finicky. I got my best results at F4.0 and up(smaller) in aperture. Good when it behaved...but Baaaad when it didn't.

The micro-adjustment is a new feature on the 50D and 5D mkII camera bodies. If it is out of cal it will probably need to go to Canon for adjustment.

Scott_Quier

Snowgirl wrote:

Where can I find information on "dialing in" lenses?

I just got the 50 f/1.8 and am working on learning how to focus it properly.

Thanks.

Jeff beat me to the answer - I was out booking a wedding so I guess I can be excusedlol

Scott_Quier

jeffreaux2 wrote:

Tick Tock Tick Tock.........:D

OK Jeff - it's been more than 4 hour since your post. Where's some of the first shots from it? You've been going on and on and on and on about this camera for 3 days now. I think it's about time to see some shots!

divamum

Scott_Quier wrote:

OK Jeff - it's been more than 4 hour since your post. Where's some of the first shots from it? You've been going on and on and on and on about this camera for 3 days now. I think it's about time to see some shots!

Heeeheeeee....!! :D:D:D:D ::taps foot and looks at watch::

jeffreaux2

Scott_Quier wrote:

OK Jeff - it's been more than 4 hour since your post. Where's some of the first shots from it? You've been going on and on and on and on about this camera for 3 days now. I think it's about time to see some shots!

Well....I got the battery charged....and set up the menu. I played with it a bit...but only a bit....I am trying to complete my edits from an e-session I did this week. Hopefully, I can get up early tommorrow and finish the edits up and then go feel it out some.

Its super quick and responsive though....I can say that much already!

rwells

Jeff,

Congratulations on your new body


I just wish it was that easy in real life. I need a new body. The one I'm living in is getting pretty slow, and the imagers are getting blurry

Snowgirl

jeffreaux2 wrote:

The 50mm F1.8 CAN be finicky. I got my best results at F4.0 and up(smaller) in aperture. Good when it behaved...but Baaaad when it didn't.

The micro-adjustment is a new feature on the 50D and 5D mkII camera bodies. If it is out of cal it will probably need to go to Canon for adjustment.

Thanks Jeff and Scott.

I'll work away and learning the quirks of my new lens.

NeilL

jeffreaux2 wrote:

It might be possible that a person from Australia might ship you a replacement.....that is....provided you could find that person...and he be willing to do so.

That could be arranged, yes.

Scott_Quier

jeffreaux2 wrote:

Also, it would be extremely helpful to me....and probably to other dgrinners if you post a thread on your process that you went through....the method...that you used to dial it in. Maybe in Techniques?

For those that are interested, you can find my "tutorial" on how I dial in a lens in this thread.

NeilL

Scott_Quier wrote:

For those that are interested, you can find my "tutorial" on how I dial in a lens in this thread.

Thanks, Scott! And if you do want to replace that hat I can possibly assist, now or later, as you like. Let me know

Scott_Quier

NeilL wrote:

Thanks, Scott! And if you do want to replace that hat I can possibly assist, now or later, as you like. Let me know

Thanks for the offer - I will be following up on that in the next day or so. I really appreciate it!

Andy

Snowgirl wrote:

Congrats. Time to change your "my gear" list

Actually, time to put 'gear' in the profile where it belongs, not in the signature

Moogle Pepper

Hey Jeff,

Belated congratulations on the 50D!

Snowgirl

Andy wrote:

Actually, time to put 'gear' in the profile where it belongs, not in the signature

Curious as to how to make it show up? I went into my profile and looked - I have listed my gear but it doesn't show in my profile.

Scott_Quier

Snowgirl wrote:

Curious as to how to make it show up? I went into my profile and looked - I have listed my gear but it doesn't show in my profile.

It does show up ... but where it belongs - in your profile. I think (and this is just a guess on my part) the idea is that you list your stuff in your profile so people can easily find it when they are trying to help you solve problems. It doesn't show up in your siggy and clutter your posts - more elegant that way!