[Completed] Wufoo forms, stat counter & Vimeo

Baldy

As we work on JavaScript and all its complications and restrictions, we can quickly build content blocks in new SmugMug for some of the most popular requests: Wufoo forms, Statcounter and Vimeo (that one doesn't get mentioned on dgrin much but we hear about it elsewhere).

Unless something unexpected happens, these should be ready in days, not weeks.

I hope you can sympathise with how much better this is for 95% of customers than sending them to dgrin and having them copy and paste JavaScript, which they'll never do.

BTW, I got an earful on the phone this afternoon from a customer who blames us for not moderating dgrin. I believe her words were, "Some of those people are crazy."

WiscoFrank

Nice .. Wufoo forms should be a popular addition.

JCphotography

I just used HTML box in the footer to display my statcounter

JamesGPhoto

What about ISSUU publications??

Darter02

THANK YOU for implementing the full Statcounter!

dereksurfs

Baldy wrote: »

As we work on JavaScript and all its complications and restrictions, we can quickly build content blocks in new SmugMug for some of the most popular requests: Wufoo forms, Statcounter and Vimeo (that one doesn't get mentioned on dgrin much but we hear about it elsewhere).

Unless something unexpected happens, these should be ready in days, not weeks.

I hope you can sympathise with how much better this is for 95% of customers than sending them to dgrin and having them copy and paste JavaScript, which they'll never do.

BTW, I got an earful on the phone this afternoon from a customer who blames us for not moderating dgrin. I believe her words were, "Some of those people are crazy."

Yes, having many of the new features baked in is a huge upgrade!!! Obviously there is a different perspective for some of the legacy users who relished in these self-help tutorials, scripts, hacks and the like. But for the larger user base it was arcane knowledge reserved for the elite tinkerers. Obviously they took great pride in all they could tweak themselves. But attaining such functionality via yet 'another' custom javascript change was making matters worse for an ever increasing user base. In addition it was not a very scalable, extensible or maintainable approach. Though it did allow for some great creativity and unique functional behaviors. I had a number of potential SM customers who liked my legacy site ask me how they could do something similar. And I honestly didn't even know where to begin. All the hours, tweaks and changes began to sort of blend together. So it was difficult to pass on even to friends, especially if they didn't like coding or have the time required to do it.

Regarding the customer's last statement I was pretty surprised by the level, tone and repetitive nature of some of the rant threads. I guess you want to allow for freedom of expression which is great. But there seemed to be a handful of loud individuals with specific axes to grind unwilling to listen to reason, especially if it deviated at all from their wishes or senses of entitlement. Oh well, I guess you take the good with the bad and learn to make lemonade.

Richard

Baldy wrote: »

Unless something unexpected happens, these should be ready in days, not weeks.

I hope you can sympathise with how much better this is for 95% of customers than sending them to dgrin and having them copy and paste JavaScript, which they'll never do.

Excellent Glad to hear these are coming soon.

Even experienced programmers would rather enter something into a text box than copy and paste code.

Baldy wrote: »

BTW, I got an earful on the phone this afternoon from a customer who blames us for not moderating dgrin. I believe her words were, "Some of those people are crazy."

She must be new here.

jasonscottphoto

Yay

Manta

Thank you. I'm surprised you haven't heard more Vimeo requests. I know my legacy site has a HTML page with embedded links to all my videos. So that and Statcounter adds are very welcomed!

I started playing around last night with customization and after some playing, it does become more intuitive. Though the people on dgrin (excluding the "crazies") are a great resource too for sticking points and CSS.

paulbrock

Thanks for the update and quick fix.

Sheaf

StatCounter turns out to be a problem. Their JS is, to put it mildly, horrible. We're very hesitant to support the full version, which requires the terrible JS. But adding the basic version where it is focused on image hits, is certainly possible.

JSmock

We can already add the basic version, I have it on my unveiled site, but it is as close to worthless as they come. I need the full JS version really bad.

Andy

JSmock wrote: »

We can already add the basic version, I have it on my unveiled site, but it is as close to worthless as they come. I need the full JS version really bad.

Very curious what Statcounter gives you that GA doesn't?

JSmock

Andy, I've used it on 20 or more sites for a lot of years and it just fits my way of doing things.

Richard

Sheaf wrote: »

StatCounter turns out to be a problem. Their JS is, to put it mildly, horrible. We're very hesitant to support the full version, which requires the terrible JS. But adding the basic version where it is focused on image hits, is certainly possible.

SM stats already give us image hits, better than Statcounter in fact, which misses slideshows. The basic version is not worth using, as far as I can see.

jasonscottphoto

Sheaf wrote: »

StatCounter turns out to be a problem. Their JS is, to put it mildly, horrible. We're very hesitant to support the full version, which requires the terrible JS. But adding the basic version where it is focused on image hits, is certainly possible.

KQuinlan

On the topic of Google Analytics... Is there any way to implement the full google analytics code? I believe on the legacy smugmug I had a a javascript addon, I think to get full functionality. Currently with my Google Analytics ID in smugmug, I am getting a limited version of the stats. I used to track what keywords people got to my site by, now almost all the hits show up as "Direct Traffic" instead of the search traffic that I know they are. In Legacy Smugmug, I would have a list of the 20 or 30 keywords that people found parts of my site from that day.... That was the main reason I was using GA.

paulbrock

Hmm.. I would hope to have access to the full Google analytics. +1 to adding this if needed.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Richard

Andy wrote: »

Very curious what Statcounter gives you that GA doesn't?

That warm and fuzzy feeling of doing exactly what I was doing five years ago, maybe? Don't laugh--when you get older, this isn't a bad thing at all.

Seriously, as far as I can see, GA doesn't let you look at the flow of an individual visit, which can be interesting. Otherwise, I think all the data are there if you know where to look. I suppose I could live without Statcounter as long as GA retains its full functionality.

JSmock

Richard wrote: »

That warm and fuzzy feeling of doing exactly what I was doing five years ago, maybe? Don't laugh--when you get older, this isn't a bad thing at all.

Ain't that the truth.

jasonscottphoto

Richard wrote: »

That warm and fuzzy feeling of doing exactly what I was doing five years ago, maybe? Don't laugh--when you get older, this isn't a bad thing at all.

Seriously, as far as I can see, GA doesn't let you look at the flow of an individual visit, which can be interesting. Otherwise, I think all the data are there if you know where to look. I suppose I could live without Statcounter as long as GA retains its full functionality.

Yes, that is what I like to use on statcounter as well - visitor paths.

I don't know how to use GA even though I've had an account for a long time I don't understand the reports..

Been using SC for a looooooong time and understand how it works.

zacHer0

Richard wrote: »

That warm and fuzzy feeling of doing exactly what I was doing five years ago, maybe? Don't laugh--when you get older, this isn't a bad thing at all.

Andy is old enough to be a gandpa. Oh wait :giggle

Andy

zacHer0 wrote: »

Andy is old enough to be a gandpa. Hh wait :giggle

:smack :rutt :rutt :rutt

Darter02

jasonscottphoto wrote: »

Yes, that is what I like to use on statcounter as well - visitor paths.

This is one function I check often. I use both, and I find they both have various tools I like to use. Neither stands completely alone, in fact, sometimes they do not jive together at all. On a day to day though, I use Statcounter. I have it on all my sites, and it's always nice to see an overview of how all of them are doing on one page.

Baldy

jasonscottphoto wrote: »

Yes, that is what I like to use on statcounter as well - visitor paths.

Ugh, this is one of those times when I hope we're doing the right thing by responding to customer requests.

Dana is working on this but trying to modify their code so it doesn't have performance ramifications and and conflict with our JavaScript. In a few days I an update you on his progress, but it gives me heartburn to pull him from other projects.

paulbrock

I remain confused to what Smugmug's approach to javascript actually is. sounds like the focus is as much on vetting code and only letting through 'approved' apps, as it is on adding in a simple way for site owners to add functionality to their sites. Is the performance issue one that will affect sites that don't use that code?

Baldy

On the other hand, I just got a demo of the Wufoo forms from Mike and they are cool, and I know a lot of customers want them. He feels he's close to submitting them to QA, maybe tonight.

Darter02

Baldy wrote: »

Ugh, this is one of those times when I hope we're doing the right thing by responding to customer requests.

Just so you don't think I want this feature for an arbitrary reason, let me explain why I use the visitor paths. As I am sure you're aware advertising on wedding sites can be pricey. When I see someone came from of the services I pay for I like to see just what they do on my site. It's one of the reasons I was so certain I wanted my calendar & map page, because I can SEE that potential clients use it. I can see what galleries are the most popular when they check out my work, and I will then tailor my ad space on the sites they came from by using the more popular images. I also use it to decide who will be getting my money next year. Right now there is one very expensive service that I get hardly any traffic from, and by seeing their visitor paths I also see it's just hits to the main page and not even to my wedding services section. I'm assuming their using a bot so my "hit counts" THEY keep track of look legit.

I'm sorry you're stressing. Come to Madison and I'll take you to some of the best breweries you could imagine:slurp.

jarboedoggart

awesome. happy to see the quick response to requests.

Darter02

As as show of faith, I'll unveil my new site tonight after a few more tweaks on the back end. Not that it's anything grand, or anything...

jasonscottphoto

Baldy wrote: »

Ugh, this is one of those times when I hope we're doing the right thing by responding to customer requests.

Dana is working on this but trying to modify their code so it doesn't have performance ramifications and and conflict with our JavaScript. In a few days I an update you on his progress, but it gives me heartburn to pull him from other projects.

Thank you!!!