Assignment #15: Panning blur
Nikolai
Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
Well, I think we run enough stairs to feel charhged for the next assignment.
This new assignment is going to be a bit more technical than the majority of the previous ones.
You need to get the picture of a moving subject in a way that the subject preferably stays as sharp as possible, while the background would naturally blur.
Pedestrians, bicilysts, cars - I'm sure you can find something moving around you. Remember that the primary object needs to stay sharp, or, at least, look sharper than the background.
As always: fresh pictures only. Definitely no PS blur.:deal
For the rest of the basic rules and index please check out this sticky.
Let's pan'n'blur!
This new assignment is going to be a bit more technical than the majority of the previous ones.
You need to get the picture of a moving subject in a way that the subject preferably stays as sharp as possible, while the background would naturally blur.
Pedestrians, bicilysts, cars - I'm sure you can find something moving around you. Remember that the primary object needs to stay sharp, or, at least, look sharper than the background.
As always: fresh pictures only. Definitely no PS blur.:deal
For the rest of the basic rules and index please check out this sticky.
Let's pan'n'blur!
"May the f/stop be with you!"
0
Comments
Before I have done it but the photo is not good for here as it is not a fresh one.
It was shot in Vietnam during the hush hour and no filter, no CS2 no tricks.
These are some shots I took this morning.
There was much light as the weather is/was very nice.
But today I have photos with one trick: NDF and CPF
The speed was too slow...
Aperture: f/9.0 ISO: 200 Focal Length: 38mm (guess: 39mm in 35mm) Exposure Time: 0.05s (1/20) Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode Exposure Program: Shutter priority
Thanks for spearheading this one for us!
It's a tough one, ain't it?
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Are those all fresh???
I goofed.....eeeek! Got so excited for motion blur shots I went and grabbed them....ok.....going for fresh stuff ...they are kind of cool though, don't ya think?
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
I agree, I simply seemed to remember one or two being posted quite some time ago, hence my question
Some, many, I through them away.
I do know it's not very good.
There are more in my site in here or, later in here.
I just post here 6 of them. The advantage of your assignments is that they make us to go on the field, try and try, and read, investigate.
Well, this is the best so far.
That's exactly the idea:-)
Thanks for going out and trying!
My pleasure ! clapthumbthumb
― Edward Weston
How is this?
Aaron
Aaron Newman
Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
That's pretty darn cool! Considering how muich the b/g is panned... Very nice!
It's a nice shot, but... I don't see any trace of panning and/or b/g blur..
While I was playing with motion blur, here is another shot I got:
Interesting...
Thanks for the entries!
I still do not like it very much. I have to try again and I hope I will with the same person at the same time and location.
I don't have time to make some considerations on this photo and about the others I shot on Saturday.
I hope to be able to do so late in the evening.
Thank you for watching.
THis assignment is a tough one technically. Don't despair. The more you try it, the more benefitial it'll be for you.
Practice makes perfect:-)
I have been thinking that perhaps you should give some kind of tips, or/and ask the photographers to do so, otherwise these assignments are no more than repositories of photos under a theme. Just an opinion. OK ?
At the 1.st set of pictures I was using the 16-35 and the cars were pretty close to me: about 4 to 5 meters.
The cars were driving slowly but fast enough to fill the viewfinder in a while difficulting the job.
I should be shooting under another angle to get better/acceptable results or in a different position looking at the car as the speed changes with the angle towards the camera, even it travels at constant speed.
On the runner the same problem happened to me.
But I was using the 24-70 instead and the speed involved is quite different. I had only the opportunity to make some 15 shots.
Very few.
In both series I have been using the flash in Slow Syncronization to make a blur in the object.
The focus in the camera was in AI Servo, 200 ISO (I like 200 ISO don't know why ).
I know that shooting an object 25 meters away with a 100 mm or 200 mm is easier than what I am doing. If the object is not coming to us but perpendicular to the axis of the lens.
The question here is to keep the axis of the lens aligned with the object.
This has been often, too often, my problem.
While the camera shoots, I realize that my central point of focus is not on the object anymore but at the back of it, because I concentrate on the composition (?).
Wrong, because I want the object sharp and still, quiet.
I must concentrate on the central point. Period.
And shoot away.
Have to try. I must. I want. I'll do it tomorrow.
No. I was writing this lines and I decided to shoot NOW.
This experience - it doesn't matter colour temperature, etc - proves what I was saying before about the axis.
My hand is still in relation to the camera and - in spite of the low speed - I succeed 1 shot in 8 concentrating on the relative position.
And how about this triple motion blur with reverted lens hood (!) ?
Aperture: f/2.8 ISO: 200 Focal Length: 17mm (guess: 18mm in 35mm) Exposure Time: 0.1666s (1/6) Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode Exposure Program: Shutter priority Exposure Bias: -0.333333333333
You've made very valid points, and that's exactly what I wanted to happen - a person realizing there is something wrong and finding out the way to fix it. I'm positive that now you remember your own findings MUCH better compared to a possible bunch of tips I could provide right off the bat. Now not only you know what works (your last images are pretty good), you also know what does not.
You see, I'm an old school guy. In my time the way they taught swimming was to throw a kid in a deep place and let him be. Most swam out:-).
These assigments are set kinda the same way. Theme is set and then off you go. It's like the life itself - no boundaries, but no support line either.
As I said - your last set is very good!
Big Red Truck f4.5 @ 1/20 with xti and nifty fifty
douglas
After dinner I went for the pictures to the exposition in Lisbon next month.
No rain, camera in the boot of the car as usual.
Here are some shots, successful ones I think.
I used the 70-200 f/2.8 L USM.
May be the colour correction is not that good ... This is the best I can do so far.
I decided this time to post part of the exif for a better understanding of the picture. I got these from a session of 110 photos.
Aperture: f/3.2 ISO: 1600 Focal Length: 70mm (guess: 71mm in 35mm) Exposure Time: 0.0333s (1/30) Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode Exposure Program: Aperture priority Exposure Bias: 0 ExposureMode: 0 White Balance: auto
Aperture: f/3.2 ISO: 1600 Focal Length: 70mm (guess: 71mm in 35mm) Exposure Time: 0.0333s (1/30) Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode Exposure Program: Aperture priority Exposure Bias: 0 ExposureMode: 0 White Balance: auto
More here for now and latter here
douglas
If it's me, what I think it is, I have to say that the EXIF is a copy of SmugMug's. ( I mean from the photo when it is in SmugMug).
I myself never really understood that thing of guess but ...
You gave me the opportunity to ...
douglas
I was trying out 2nd curtain flash effect with the onboard flash on my xti. Its kind of interesting it freezes the main subject but you still get light trails with slow shutter. Will be nice to play around when i get a better flash.
Exif here: levels adjusted in PS
douglas
Okay Nikolai- after getting whipped on my first image I went back out. Thanks for these assignments I do believe I got it this time.
F22 1/8Shutter 200ISO
The Race Track
Aaron
Aaron Newman
Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
Thanks for the entries, guys!
Aaron, this one is pretty cool - sharp subject, blurred b/g:
Cheers!
Those are pretty cool!