New Nikon Info Finally Released

124

Comments

  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2007
    The information keeps flowing in. :D
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • jwwjww Registered Users Posts: 449 Major grins
    edited September 15, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    The information keeps flowing in. :D

    ..I like this kinda info! Keep it flowing! :D

    thanks!
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 17, 2007
    Moose Peterson just got his hands on a D3. His reaction was OMG.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • jwwjww Registered Users Posts: 449 Major grins
    edited September 20, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    Moose Peterson just got his hands on a D3. His reaction was OMG.

    ..yup.. I was already sold and reading his comments put the D3 from wish list to gotta have !!

    Thanks for keeping the info coming!
  • greenpeagreenpea Registered Users Posts: 880 Major grins
    edited September 20, 2007
    Scott Kelby says on his blog that he is getting an opportunity to shoot with the D3 today at Glacier National Park. I'm looking forward to seeing what kind of shots he gets. Hopefully he'll have something posted this afternoon.
    Andrew
    initialphotography.smugmug.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera" - Dorothea Lange
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    greenpea wrote:
    Scott Kelby says on his blog that he is getting an opportunity to shoot with the D3 today at Glacier National Park. I'm looking forward to seeing what kind of shots he gets. Hopefully he'll have something posted this afternoon.

    He liked it.


    "Although I didn’t get a chance to shoot with the Nikon D3 during the morning shoot, I spent hours with it tonight at our dusk shoot, and I have to say; not only does it live up to it’s hype, I’d have to say it actually exceeds it. There are a lot of things to love about the D3, but the lack of noise is far beyond what I had ever imagined (and I had heard stories of people raving about the low noise, but you’ve really got to see it in person to believe it)."
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    DPR's D3 preview.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • Manfr3dManfr3d Registered Users Posts: 2,008 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    Whats funny is that all high iso images seen from the D300 and D3 so far
    are only in camera produced JPEG files. Even Rob Galbraith only looked at
    the JPEG images because (he says) there isn't a Program which which he
    can convert the new RAW format at this time.


    Noise reduction is aparent in all of the images we've seen so far form
    the new Nikon cameras. I understand that the new sensors are a huge
    leap for Nikon users who were beaten by noise at ISO 400 and up. But
    giving the never ending discussion about how Canon has supposedly
    fallen behind now I can't resist to compare the new Nikons to the
    older Canon 5D.

    These images are from the 5D at ISO 3200 and look very favorable
    (jsut as noise free but sharper) compared to the ISO 6400 jpeg
    images form the D3.

    http://www.pbase.com/image/68303598

    Yes it looks like they were noise reduced, but thats what the D3
    and D300 also seems to be doing. Until we've seen RAW files form
    the new Nikons its either that Nikon has greatly improved the
    in camera noice reduction along with a better sensor or that they
    are crappy at reducing noise in camera and have a great low noise
    sensor. Either way, the comparision shows hat Nikon has caught on
    but not that its now better than Canon.
    “To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
    ― Edward Weston
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    Manfr3d wrote:
    Noise reduction is aparent in all of the images we've seen so far form
    the new Nikon cameras. I understand that the new sensors are a huge
    leap for Nikon users who were beaten by noise at ISO 400 and up. But
    giving the never ending discussion about how Canon has supposedly
    fallen behind now I can't resist to compare the new Nikons to the
    older Canon 5D.

    I don't think anyone here has said that the D3 or the D300 is better than any other camera. I don't think any of the links I have posted have made that assertion either.

    All the reports have been very impressed with the D3 so far. Once we get production cameras out there and tests are done under controlled circumstances we can start comparing shots, pixel peeping, and silly arguments about which is "better". Right now its a bit premature.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • Manfr3dManfr3d Registered Users Posts: 2,008 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    I don't think anyone here has said that the D3 or the D300 is better than any other camera. I don't think any of the links I have posted have made that assertion either.

    All the reports have been very impressed with the D3 so far. Once we get production cameras out there and tests are done under controlled circumstances we can start comparing shots, pixel peeping, and silly arguments about which is "better". Right now its a bit premature.

    Obviously I assumed that you ppl are not just reading this
    one forum and are somewhat following they current hype
    about the high iso and the tailed which camera is better
    discussion.

    The very point of my post was to show that the discussion
    is indeed hype at this moment and that without raw files
    no conclusions can be drawn. I hope thats clearer now.
    “To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
    ― Edward Weston
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    Manfr3d wrote:
    Obviously I assumed that you ppl are not just reading this
    one forum and are somewhat following they current hype
    about the high iso and the tailed which camera is better
    discussion.

    That's the problem you keep responding to posts on other forums. Perhaps if you responded in the forums where that was raised it would be less confusing. :D
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • Manfr3dManfr3d Registered Users Posts: 2,008 Major grins
    edited September 21, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    That's the problem you keep responding to posts on other forums. Perhaps if you responded in the forums where that was raised it would be less confusing. :D

    You're still not getting my point Sir. I merely tried to point out whats
    going on on the net right now and what's wrong with it. Maybe its a
    generation thing? I mean I was really surprised by your repliy that showed
    me that people like you actualy understand the discussion very singular
    and linear as if it was actualy taking place only in one thread in one forum.

    headscratch.gif
    “To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
    ― Edward Weston
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited September 21, 2007
    OK, that's it. No more unwanted or unwarranted comments or comparisons to try and detract from the Nikon celebration of these rather fantastic new cameras in this thread or the "Nikon D3 (and D300) Samples". Violators will get a couple of days off.

    If you want to compare cameras, start a new thread and keep it civil.

    Are we clear?
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • kygardenkygarden Registered Users Posts: 1,060 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2007
    Another user report. Wedding photog test drives D3 during wedding. Glowing review...well, not a review, but his thoughts on the camera after having used it and looked at the files on his computer...

    http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2007
    kygarden wrote:
    Another user report. Wedding photog test drives D3 during wedding. Glowing review...well, not a review, but his thoughts on the camera after having used it and looked at the files on his computer...

    http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html

    Looking good clap.gif.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • LiquidityLiquidity Registered Users Posts: 13 Big grins
    edited September 24, 2007
    Ask Scott Kelby questions about his experience with the D3 here in the comments section: http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/585#comments and he will try to answer what he can.
    Wil
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 26, 2007
    Liquidity wrote:
    Ask Scott Kelby questions about his experience with the D3 here in the comments section: http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/585#comments and he will try to answer what he can.

    His answers are posted.

    This response caught my attention "ISO 1200 on the D3 is like ISO 400 on the D2Xs. The noise is dramatically, shockingly, stunningly less."
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 26, 2007
    Here are sone downloadable high ISO D3 images.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • PaulThomasMcKeePaulThomasMcKee Registered Users Posts: 429 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    New D300 & Kudos to Nikon Service Department
    Just got my 18-200mm Nikkor back from Nikon Service yesterday :D and I wanted to express my complete satisfaction with the experience from start to finish! Not only did they provide timely, excellent service with great communication - the cherry on top is that they shipped my lens back via Next Day Air! I just have the single lens at this point - so it was great to get it back.

    I jumped into digital with the D200 & 18-200 combo in March of 2006 because I felt it offered the most pro level features, best handling and widest focal range (with a single lens) for my somewhat limited budget. I love my D200 dearly. But, I worried that Nikon may never truely compete with Canon in the full frame sensor arena...and that made me reluctant to dive in deeper with additional Nikon lenses and gear.

    With the announcement of the D3, that concern has been erased. Although I don't intend to buy one soon, knowing that the D3 (or some future full frame variant) is out there as an upgrade path has solidified my commitment to Nikon. I did order a D300 to replace the D200 which is going to my oldest son who just graduated from university and is itching to have his own DSLR.
  • StephaniespixStephaniespix Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    Motivation indeed!

    Stephanie
  • HarveyMushmanHarveyMushman Registered Users Posts: 550 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    Those of you who have ordered a D300 or D3: Did you pay for the camera in advance? Did you pay a deposit? Or have you just "committed" to buying once it's available? Did you get any kind of delivery date assurance?
    Tim
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    Those of you who have ordered a D300 or D3: Did you pay for the camera in advance? Did you pay a deposit? Or have you just "committed" to buying once it's available? Did you get any kind of delivery date assurance?

    The places I have gone to Ritz, Calmut, and a local store in PA have my charge info but won't put the charge through until they have shipped the camera.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    Here are sone downloadable high ISO D3 images.
    Wow.

    On some, the color looks funky. But amazingly impressive.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2007
    kygarden wrote:
    Another user report. Wedding photog test drives D3 during wedding. Glowing review...well, not a review, but his thoughts on the camera after having used it and looked at the files on his computer...

    http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html
    Gorgeous.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • patch29patch29 Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,928 Major grins
    edited September 28, 2007
    Rob Galbraith has some new D3 images posted, here. 6400 certainly looks amazing.
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 28, 2007
    patch29 wrote:
    Rob Galbraith has some new D3 images posted, here. 6400 certainly looks amazing.

    It is amazing.

    This can be a real breakthrough (fingers crossed). Next year Canon will have to top it and then Nikon will have to up the ante. All shooters will profit if the released camera lives up to the pre-game hype.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • kygardenkygarden Registered Users Posts: 1,060 Major grins
    edited October 3, 2007
    If you haven't already seen these new D3 photos (from sports photog), here ya go...

    http://galleries.daveeinsel.com/d3test/
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited October 3, 2007
    kygarden wrote:
    If you haven't already seen these new D3 photos (from sports photog), here ya go...

    http://galleries.daveeinsel.com/d3test/

    Very nice tonality, even at ISO 6400. It looks like this camera is going to be a big winner for sports shooters and naturalists. Bravo Nikon! clap.gif

    I can't wait for the formal reviews to come in.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • dangindangin Registered Users Posts: 458 Major grins
    edited October 3, 2007
    Those of you who have ordered a D300 or D3: Did you pay for the camera in advance? Did you pay a deposit? Or have you just "committed" to buying once it's available? Did you get any kind of delivery date assurance?

    cc on file @ calumet. as soon as it comes in, they charge, it clears, they ship, i get new toy and likely get yelled @ by wife for spending 5k on a camera. :D
    - Dan

    - my photography: www.dangin.com
    - my blog: www.dangin.com/blog
    - follow me on twitter: @danginphoto
  • greenpeagreenpea Registered Users Posts: 880 Major grins
    edited October 3, 2007
    Those of you who have ordered a D300 or D3: Did you pay for the camera in advance? Did you pay a deposit? Or have you just "committed" to buying once it's available? Did you get any kind of delivery date assurance?

    I ordered a D300 Adorama. They won't charge anything on my card until it ships. So far I don't have a delievery date assurance (only that they expect the cameras to arrive in 30-45 days, and my place in line is assured by the confirmation of my credit card. As to whether I will get my camera from that first shipment or the 500th shipment...).
    Andrew
    initialphotography.smugmug.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera" - Dorothea Lange
Sign In or Register to comment.