Some Help Printing Please!
Hi-
My prints all have a slight yellow cast to them. Can I adjust something in Smugmug to remove it? I've selected auto color for printing, I'm using a macbook, set to sRGB, and the mac and the external monitor have been calibrated as carefully as I could.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
JCC
The chart is a bit mis-leading. As a whole, not. But by market segment I think
it might be. For example; in the CAD/EDA world, we are almost 100% linux (or
some variant of it).
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
The chart is a bit mis-leading. As a whole, not. But by market segment I think
it might be. For example; in the CAD/EDA world, we are almost 100% linux (or
some variant of it).
Probably why Sun OS and HP-UX show up, since they are dominant in Workstations.
What the heck?? This chart shows operating systems... and then some O/S I've never heard of with 4.59% of something.
Assume you mean MacIntel. this would be Mac with Intel chips, vs Mac OS, presumably an older, version like OS 9.
The chart is a bit mis-leading. As a whole, not. But by market segment I think
it might be. For example; in the CAD/EDA world, we are almost 100% linux (or
some variant of it).
I thought the different flavors of nix had a much stronger presesnce then those numbers show as well.
I thought the different flavors of nix had a much stronger presesnce then those numbers show as well.
If you broke them into market segments, yes. I think the nix's are a much larger
percentage of say the Business segment. And if you look at the mix of OS's,
where Solaris was dominant 5 years ago, it's hardly a factor anymore (hence
OpenSolaris--I think).
To put it differently, a 280R used to cost several thousand dollars for a single
uSPARC processor. You could get 1U PC hardware that cost half as much,
consumed fewer watts and ran twice as fast and in the EDA world, 2x the
throughput is a more efficient use of the software licenses. And licenses
are significantly more expensive than hardware to run the tools.
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
If you broke them into market segments, yes. I think the nix's are a much larger
percentage of say the Business segment. And if you look at the mix of OS's,
where Solaris was dominant 5 years ago, it's hardly a factor anymore (hence
OpenSolaris--I think).
To put it differently, a 280R used to cost several thousand dollars for a single
uSPARC processor. You could get 1U PC hardware that cost half as much,
consumed fewer watts and ran twice as fast and in the EDA world, 2x the
throughput is a more efficient use of the software licenses. And licenses
are significantly more expensive than hardware to run the tools.
Don't forget that this is Desktop measurements, not server. Unix is no where in the business world as a desktop platform. Manufacturing/CAD/CAM, yes, but not Business. It is dominant as a server platform for Business however.
Don't forget that this is Desktop measurements, not server. Unix is no where in the business world as a desktop platform. Manufacturing/CAD/CAM, yes, but not Business. It is dominant as a server platform for Business however.
Which is why I mentioned the business segment in my reply.
I would add that in engineering environments, the preferred desktop is
Linux. For us, a desktop is a server when you're not sitting there
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Assume you mean MacIntel. this would be Mac with Intel chips, vs Mac OS, presumably an older, version like OS 9.
so the PowerBook (non-Intel) that I'm using right now, running OS X, would fall where in their chart? I'm just not sure I'd be putting much faith in a chart made by somebody that can't even distinguish between hardware and software.
I thought the different flavors of nix had a much stronger presesnce then those numbers show as well.
As a percentage of machines that people use to surf the web?
Nah.
There are like zero Sun or HP-UX boxes in use at peoples' homes these days. They are workstations, and people are doing CAD/CAE/etc., on them and not surfing the web. They're using their Macs or PCs next to them to do that.
There are like zero Sun or HP-UX boxes in use at peoples' homes these days. They are workstations, and people are doing CAD/CAE/etc., on them and not surfing the web. They're using their Macs or PCs next to them to do that.
Desktop workstations are PC's running Windows and using VNC or Exceed
or Linux. Gone are the days people get two machines--too much of a support
burden.
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Ok, does anyone else have problem with the Gawker family of sites (Lifehacker, Jalopnik, etc.) when using Safari 3.1 on OS X 10.5.2? For me, it defaults to the iPhone "theme" on all of those sites. If I force the user-agent to Mozilla (or open it *with* Mozilla) it displays fine. I reported the problem to Ray Wert (Jalopnik editor) and he was forwarding it on to their techies, but it's been going on so long that I feel like I must be the only one seeing it!
Ok, does anyone else have problem with the Gawker family of sites (Lifehacker, Jalopnik, etc.) when using Safari 3.1 on OS X 10.5.2? For me, it defaults to the iPhone "theme" on all of those sites. If I force the user-agent to Mozilla (or open it *with* Mozilla) it displays fine. I reported the problem to Ray Wert (Jalopnik editor) and he was forwarding it on to their techies, but it's been going on so long that I feel like I must be the only one seeing it!
Ok, does anyone else have problem with the Gawker family of sites (Lifehacker, Jalopnik, etc.) when using Safari 3.1 on OS X 10.5.2? For me, it defaults to the iPhone "theme" on all of those sites. If I force the user-agent to Mozilla (or open it *with* Mozilla) it displays fine. I reported the problem to Ray Wert (Jalopnik editor) and he was forwarding it on to their techies, but it's been going on so long that I feel like I must be the only one seeing it!
Ok, does anyone else have problem with the Gawker family of sites (Lifehacker, Jalopnik, etc.) when using Safari 3.1 on OS X 10.5.2? For me, it defaults to the iPhone "theme" on all of those sites.
do you have developer tools, perhaps including the iPhone SDK, installed?
I've heard talk of using Safari to intentionally mimic the iPhone (to gain free WiFi access at Starbucks, which iPhone users get automagically); maybe you've accidentally triggered the same sort of behaviour.
My new dilemma guys. Im using the default email for Leopard. If i try and copy & past a link to a single photo from my smugmug account into an email that im replying to...its invisible. I know the link pastes for sure & ive tried changing colours but it stays white on white. The curser moves & i can see the red underlines alerting me that is a spelling mistake so i know its there...just invisible.
Actually it shows its face when i highlight it. Still white on white tough.
However i can copy & paste the URL of the album just fine.
My new dilemma guys. Im using the default email for Leopard. If i try and copy & past a link to a single photo from my smugmug account into an email that im replying to...its invisible. I know the link pastes for sure & ive tried changing colours but it stays white on white. The curser moves & i can see the red underlines alerting me that is a spelling mistake so i know its there...just invisible.
Actually it shows its face when i highlight it. Still white on white tough.
However i can copy & paste the URL of the album just fine.
Any ideas ?
My gut says that you are sending HTML formatted mail which is following the typical default of white text from SmugMug and you do not have a background. I am surprised that changing the colors does not work. I do not use Mail to know how to fix it. I am solely guessing based on the symptoms.
Comments
Hi-
My prints all have a slight yellow cast to them. Can I adjust something in Smugmug to remove it? I've selected auto color for printing, I'm using a macbook, set to sRGB, and the mac and the external monitor have been calibrated as carefully as I could.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
JCC
The chart is a bit mis-leading. As a whole, not. But by market segment I think
it might be. For example; in the CAD/EDA world, we are almost 100% linux (or
some variant of it).
Probably why Sun OS and HP-UX show up, since they are dominant in Workstations.
Assume you mean MacIntel. this would be Mac with Intel chips, vs Mac OS, presumably an older, version like OS 9.
If you broke them into market segments, yes. I think the nix's are a much larger
percentage of say the Business segment. And if you look at the mix of OS's,
where Solaris was dominant 5 years ago, it's hardly a factor anymore (hence
OpenSolaris--I think).
To put it differently, a 280R used to cost several thousand dollars for a single
uSPARC processor. You could get 1U PC hardware that cost half as much,
consumed fewer watts and ran twice as fast and in the EDA world, 2x the
throughput is a more efficient use of the software licenses. And licenses
are significantly more expensive than hardware to run the tools.
Don't forget that this is Desktop measurements, not server. Unix is no where in the business world as a desktop platform. Manufacturing/CAD/CAM, yes, but not Business. It is dominant as a server platform for Business however.
Which is why I mentioned the business segment in my reply.
I would add that in engineering environments, the preferred desktop is
Linux. For us, a desktop is a server when you're not sitting there
my words, my "pro"pictures, my "fun" pictures, my videos.
No, they're distinguishing between OS X on Intel versus OS X on PPC. It seems an artificial distinction, and I'm not sure why it continues.
Add the two to get the OS X market share. The only people still on OS 9 are curmudgeons, and there aren't that many hobbits left in the world
Look, here's something that's:
a) interesting
b) helpful
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
that's as g33k as it gets.
Now let's continue our more inteligent discussion of... oh, nevermind
As a percentage of machines that people use to surf the web?
Nah.
There are like zero Sun or HP-UX boxes in use at peoples' homes these days. They are workstations, and people are doing CAD/CAE/etc., on them and not surfing the web. They're using their Macs or PCs next to them to do that.
Desktop workstations are PC's running Windows and using VNC or Exceed
or Linux. Gone are the days people get two machines--too much of a support
burden.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Please tell that to my current manager!
From lifehacker.com. Better links on the bottom of the post as well.
http://lifehacker.com/390226/top-10-things-you-forgot-your-mac-can-do
BTW: If you don't read lifehacker. You should.
works fine for me, same specs
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
Huh?
http://wall-art.smugmug.com/
Works fine for me as well, same specs!
do you have developer tools, perhaps including the iPhone SDK, installed?
I've heard talk of using Safari to intentionally mimic the iPhone (to gain free WiFi access at Starbucks, which iPhone users get automagically); maybe you've accidentally triggered the same sort of behaviour.
my words, my "pro"pictures, my "fun" pictures, my videos.
One of the lifehacker tools is how to change the icons and devices in Mac... so the question is how soon before a Smuggy icon for the desktop items.
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
That took all of 10 seconds.
http://wall-art.smugmug.com/
I need to get some of that time juice you have cabbey. You can crack WEP in 20 seconds and do an icon in 10?
(j/k on both parts)
Actually that's a raid volume... nice fast stripe set for temporary files like video I'm editing etc.
The 20 second WEP cracker was cmason.
For the folks that asked....
To restart finder, open a command prompt and issue this command:
Then click the now-deactivated finder icon on the dock.
http://wall-art.smugmug.com/
Actually it shows its face when i highlight it. Still white on white tough.
However i can copy & paste the URL of the album just fine.
Any ideas ?
My gut says that you are sending HTML formatted mail which is following the typical default of white text from SmugMug and you do not have a background. I am surprised that changing the colors does not work. I do not use Mail to know how to fix it. I am solely guessing based on the symptoms.
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact