We had a guy in grade school that started fights like this. He spent most of his youth sitting in a chair in the principal's office waiting for his parents to come pick him up.
My Smugmug
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
We had a guy in grade school that started fights like this. He spent most of his youth sitting in a chair in the principal's office waiting for his parents to come pick him up.
Why? Everyone knows Canon is superior. Don't they?
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Harry is OLD, shoots NIKON, and hasn't had a decent Bagel in 2 years. I'm not worried
Child's play. Poor Andy doesn't a chance. When the contest is between the young and talented and the old and wily the old and wily wins every time.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
although you have to admit, an amphibious canoe would be cool!
I just have one comment, to all those DanielB's of the world, who hold the 1DsMkII up on a pedastal: I'll venture to guess you've never held a 1D- (s, mkII, all the same)? Hold one, and then hold a D2-, you may end doing the same thing I just did.
although you have to admit, an amphibious canoe would be cool!
I just have one comment, to all those DanielB's of the world, who hold the 1DsMkII up on a pedastal: I'll venture to guess you've never held a 1D- (s, mkII, all the same)? Hold one, and then hold a D2-, you may end doing the same thing I just did.
You know what? It feels great - balances fine. Doc's a pansy, can't even hold a 55-ounce camera wah wah wah it's too heavy I'll switch to Nikon. I toldya...
although you have to admit, an amphibious canoe would be cool!
I just have one comment, to all those DanielB's of the world, who hold the 1DsMkII up on a pedastal: I'll venture to guess you've never held a 1D- (s, mkII, all the same)? Hold one, and then hold a D2-, you may end doing the same thing I just did.
i've become an adjective now?
actually i HAVE held a 1 series, 1D mkII N i believe... and yes, it was a brick. can't say i've touched a nikon though, only held the D70, D200, and D50 on the nikon side....
Nice thread so far, but not nearly enough gratuitous name calling.
So let me throw it down.
Canon is clearly superior. for the following reasons,
Canon has made Cameras longer than Nikon. Therefore they have more experience. Longer experience makes for better quality. That's why the future of photography lies not with digital, nor film. No my friend, daguerrotypes are the coming thing.
While Canon made cameras for hapy japanese tourists, Nikon made artillary rangefinders to blow up unhappy US marines. Bad Nikon!
Why does Nikon think the same motor that is appropriate for a 24mm lens is appropriate for a 400mm lens- Nikon telephoto is teh sux0rz!
USM, baby. USM. USM
Canon has sleek, yet discrete, red lines around the end of its expensive lenses, whereas in order to attract attention, Nikon users have to compensate by being more obnoxious. Fortunately, this is not difficult for them.
Canon is far less noisy than Nikon at high ISOs. The same is true of Canon shooters vs. Nikon shooters (see above post). Canon is to Nikon as James Earl Jones is to Eddie Griffin.
Nikon users are really just closeted Leica snobs with less cash.
The vaunted 200D is just the latest example of "catch-up" Two steps behind suckah! Great time to one up the 20D (as if!) when the 5d came out like AGES ago. That's soooo 2005.
Nikon users are well known for zoophilia. I'm just sayin'!
Nice thread so far, but not nearly enough gratuitous name calling.
So let me throw it down.
Canon is clearly superior. for the following reasons,
Canon has made Cameras longer than Nikon. Therefore they have more experience. Longer experience makes for better quality. That's why the future of photography lies not with digital, nor film. No my friend, daguerrotypes are the coming thing.
While Canon made cameras for hapy japanese tourists, Nikon made artillary rangefinders to blow up unhappy US marines. Bad Nikon!
Why does Nikon think the same motor that is appropriate for a 24mm lens is appropriate for a 400mm lens- Nikon telephoto is teh sux0rz!
USM, baby. USM. USM
Canon has sleek, yet discrete, red lines around the end of its expensive lenses, whereas in order to attract attention, Nikon users have to compensate by being more obnoxious. Fortunately, this is not difficult for them.
Canon is far less noisy than Nikon at high ISOs. The same is true of Canon shooters vs. Nikon shooters (see above post). Canon is to Nikon as James Earl Jones is to Eddie Griffin.
Nikon users are really just closeted Leica snobs with less cash.
The vaunted 200D is just the latest example of "catch-up" Two steps behind suckah! Great time to one up the 20D (as if!) when the 5d came out like AGES ago. That's soooo 2005.
Nikon users are well known for zoophilia. I'm just sayin'!
Nice thread so far, but not nearly enough gratuitous name calling.
So let me throw it down.
Canon is clearly superior. for the following reasons,
Canon has made Cameras longer than Nikon. Therefore they have more experience. Longer experience makes for better quality. That's why the future of photography lies not with digital, nor film. No my friend, daguerrotypes are the coming thing.
While Canon made cameras for hapy japanese tourists, Nikon made artillary rangefinders to blow up unhappy US marines. Bad Nikon!
Why does Nikon think the same motor that is appropriate for a 24mm lens is appropriate for a 400mm lens- Nikon telephoto is teh sux0rz!
USM, baby. USM. USM
Canon has sleek, yet discrete, red lines around the end of its expensive lenses, whereas in order to attract attention, Nikon users have to compensate by being more obnoxious. Fortunately, this is not difficult for them.
Canon is far less noisy than Nikon at high ISOs. The same is true of Canon shooters vs. Nikon shooters (see above post). Canon is to Nikon as James Earl Jones is to Eddie Griffin.
Nikon users are really just closeted Leica snobs with less cash.
The vaunted 200D is just the latest example of "catch-up" Two steps behind suckah! Great time to one up the 20D (as if!) when the 5d came out like AGES ago. That's soooo 2005.
Nikon users are well known for zoophilia. I'm just sayin'!
Canon does have the edge on noise. It just trails in focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build. Also Nikon users are much more amiable than Canon users. Black is beautiful!
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Canon does have the edge on noise. It just trails in focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build. Also Nikon users are much more amiable than Canon users. Black is beautiful!
Canon does have the edge on noise. It just trails in focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build. Also Nikon users are much more amiable than Canon users. Black is beautiful!
Agreed.
So Canon can make a better sensor. Um, by the way, up until recently, wasn't the sensor made by someone else anyway? Hmmmm?
How many of you always advise people on - "DSLR is all about glass, get good glass" or "pick what glass you want"... right, so how many high-end Canon microscopes have you seen? Oh right, none.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Just like a Nikon user to concentrate on petty concerns like "focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build." Please, everyone know digital photography is all about the megapixels. More = better.
What? I don't get it? You've used a Canon microscope? or even a Canon scope objective? Cuz after Zeiss, most of the best pieces of micro glass are Nikkor. 99% of UMass labs say so. Just saying, Nikon vs Canon lenses (USM, IS, motors, etc) is one thing. But even as a long time Canon shooter, I've kind of known Nikkor glass trumps Canon.
What? I don't get it? You've used a Canon microscope? or even a Canon scope objective? Cuz after Zeiss, most of the best pieces of micro glass are Nikkor. 99% of UMass labs say so. Just saying, Nikon vs Canon lenses (USM, IS, motors, etc) is one thing. But even as a long time Canon shooter, I've kind of known Nikkor glass trumps Canon.
Just like a Nikon user to concentrate on petty concerns like "focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build." Please, everyone know digital photography is all about the megapixels. More = better.
Dr. IT- Who takes photos with a microscope?
You got me there. We all need more pixels. Pixels are the the key to happiness.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Comments
Troublemaker. :thwak
We had a guy in grade school that started fights like this. He spent most of his youth sitting in a chair in the principal's office waiting for his parents to come pick him up.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Why? Everyone knows Canon is superior. Don't they?
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
Harry is OLD, shoots NIKON, and hasn't had a decent Bagel in 2 years. I'm not worried
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
....UGH....the "good guys" shoot white. :uhoh
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
I think that was the slogan for the KKK.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Child's play. Poor Andy doesn't a chance. When the contest is between the young and talented and the old and wily the old and wily wins every time.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
And we have IS on big lenses
My Photo gallery- rohirrim.smugmug.com
Selective Sharpening Tutorial
Making a Frame for your image (Tutorial)
That's about as useful as wheels on a canoe.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
I just have one comment, to all those DanielB's of the world, who hold the 1DsMkII up on a pedastal: I'll venture to guess you've never held a 1D- (s, mkII, all the same)? Hold one, and then hold a D2-, you may end doing the same thing I just did.
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
Yeah, a 1D's a brick and a half...
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
You know what? It feels great - balances fine. Doc's a pansy, can't even hold a 55-ounce camera
:hide
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
actually i HAVE held a 1 series, 1D mkII N i believe... and yes, it was a brick. can't say i've touched a nikon though, only held the D70, D200, and D50 on the nikon side....
smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com
So let me throw it down.
Canon is clearly superior. for the following reasons,
Canon has made Cameras longer than Nikon. Therefore they have more experience. Longer experience makes for better quality. That's why the future of photography lies not with digital, nor film. No my friend, daguerrotypes are the coming thing.
While Canon made cameras for hapy japanese tourists, Nikon made artillary rangefinders to blow up unhappy US marines. Bad Nikon!
Why does Nikon think the same motor that is appropriate for a 24mm lens is appropriate for a 400mm lens- Nikon telephoto is teh sux0rz!
USM, baby. USM. USM
Canon has sleek, yet discrete, red lines around the end of its expensive lenses, whereas in order to attract attention, Nikon users have to compensate by being more obnoxious. Fortunately, this is not difficult for them.
Canon is far less noisy than Nikon at high ISOs. The same is true of Canon shooters vs. Nikon shooters (see above post). Canon is to Nikon as James Earl Jones is to Eddie Griffin.
Nikon users are really just closeted Leica snobs with less cash
The vaunted 200D is just the latest example of "catch-up" Two steps behind suckah! Great time to one up the 20D (as if!) when the 5d came out like AGES ago. That's soooo 2005.
Nikon users are well known for zoophilia. I'm just sayin'!
Though, I'm not one to take sides in this debate. :uhoh
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Nikon = :crazy
Canon = :cool
Bravo!
smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com
Canon does have the edge on noise. It just trails in focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build. Also Nikon users are much more amiable than Canon users. Black is beautiful!
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
:haha :harry
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
So Canon can make a better sensor. Um, by the way, up until recently, wasn't the sensor made by someone else anyway? Hmmmm?
How many of you always advise people on - "DSLR is all about glass, get good glass" or "pick what glass you want"... right, so how many high-end Canon microscopes have you seen? Oh right, none.
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
coo-coo. coo-coo :crazy
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
:booze :andy :crazy
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Just like a Nikon user to concentrate on petty concerns like "focusing, details, sharpness, color rendition, flash, ergonomics, and body build." Please, everyone know digital photography is all about the megapixels. More = better.
Dr. IT- Who takes photos with a microscope?
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
http://www.microscopyu.com/smallworld/gallery/
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
What I hear:
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
You know its true.
I don't need a Canon Microscope.
(clicky the picky for a 100% crop)
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
You got me there. We all need more pixels. Pixels are the the key to happiness.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"