When you go to buy an image and its needs cropping to fit certain sizes....there is not an option to move the crop around. It seems to be set exactly dead center on every image. Didn't it use to allow from moving the crop within the perameters of the image? Is there a way to get this feature if its not available? Thanks for your time.
In the actual shopping cart is where the cropping is done
Bug in SmugMug gallery style comments display
I just noticed that when I'm looking at leebutlerphoto.com/popular the comments for the first photo don't go away as I click on each thumbnail to view other images. I'm using the SmugMug gallery style.
Shouldn't comments match the photo the customer is viewing?
I just noticed that when I'm looking at leebutlerphoto.com/popular the comments for the first photo don't go away as I click on each thumbnail to view other images. I'm using the SmugMug gallery style.
Shouldn't comments match the photo the customer is viewing?
Lee
Please remove the domain swapper code from your site so I can do some testing please? Thanks.
Actually, it turned out to be the Amazon Associates widget I added. It must be interfering somehow.. I removed the DIV tag below and it works normally again. Since it is loading javascript from Amazon's servers, it looks like it's out of my hands... In CSS I had it hidden on every page but the Home page, but {display: none} apparently still executes the code even when it's hidden.
Actually, it turned out to be the Amazon Associates widget I added. It must be interfering somehow.. I removed the DIV tag below and it works normally again. Since it is loading javascript from Amazon's servers, it looks like it's out of my hands... In CSS I had it hidden on every page but the Home page, but {display: none} apparently still executes the code even when it's hidden.
You could use Javascript to insert the Amazon div only on the home page. Then no Amazon code would execute on other pages because it would have never been inserted there.
You are correct that Javascript execution happens regardless of whether anything is hidden or not via CSS. Javascript execution is independent of CSS rules (except that it can change CSS rules).
You could use Javascript to insert the Amazon div only on the home page. Then no Amazon code would execute on other pages because it would have never been inserted there.
Thanks. I've looked around and it sounds like inserting Script tags on div.innerHTML is problematic on some browsers so I'll just drop the widget.
Maybe I'll create a page just to display widgets. I might have a Zazzle or CafePress merchandise widget too someday...
Keyword editing on Keyword page issue.
When logged in and on a keyword page. (for instance I click on one of the "Top 200 Photo Keywords from the homepage). Clicking on 'Edit this Caption/Keywords' OR 'Edit Captions/Keywords (BULK)' under the keyword tools just goes to a blank page.
I am using the latest version of Firefox on Windows XP and I have a pro account.
Create a Card Issue
I found that while logged in and choosing Create a Card from the 'photo tools' drop down menu that it seems to freeze at "Click 'Categories' below and choose an occasion." I click on the Categories but nothing happens. Is this because there are no categories set up at this time?
I found that while logged in and choosing Create a Card from the 'photo tools' drop down menu that it seems to freeze at "Click 'Categories' below and choose an occasion." I click on the Categories but nothing happens. Is this because there are no categories set up at this time?
Firefox 2.0.0.14, Win XP, Smug Pro Account
Hi, known, bug, we're sorry We will have it fixed and have cards other than holiday cards out soon as well, we hope!
Please reply to this thread and tell us what exactly is (not) happening. What operating system and browser are you using? Are you logged in or logged out? Please give us a link to where you see the problem. Let us know everything that you feel may be relevant, as it may help us to track down the problem.
Hi Andy - You wrote me yesterday and said that there was a bug that was sending the galleries to the bottom of a gallery instead of the beginning. Is there a way to move the gallery or do you know when the bug will be fixed? I would really like to move the newest gallery from the bottom. I just rried creating a new gallery and it went to the bottom too.
Hi Andy - You wrote me yesterday and said that there was a bug that was sending the galleries to the bottom of a gallery instead of the beginning. Is there a way to move the gallery or do you know when the bug will be fixed? I would really like to move the newest gallery from the bottom. I just rried creating a new gallery and it went to the bottom too.
On the Wedding category click on the 'arrange' link, on the next page you can use one of the 'quick sorts' or select a gallery and move as needed. I moved Bea & Seth to the top for you.
When you're logged in via. a custom domain name, the share link does not change from the username.smugmug.com standard. It *should* change to mydomain.com...
When you're logged in via. a custom domain name, the share link does not change from the username.smugmug.com standard. It *should* change to mydomain.com...
After Rearranging Galleries in Subcategory, get taken back to Home Page
This one's been annoying me for a while:
- Go to Subcategory
- Arrange a bunch of galleries
- Click on Save.
Expected Behavior:
- Taken back to Subcategory page
Textbox for edit/add a Gallery Title/Description contains wrong text after Cancelling
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to Gallery
- Click on 'add' or 'edit' next to the Gallery Title or Description
- Type in some nonsense text into the textbox.
- Click on Cancel
- Now click on 'add' or 'edit' again.
Expected behavior:
- Text in edit box should revert back to previous content
Actual behavior:
- Text in edit box is cached from previous edit or add, which presumably is the *wrong* text since you hit Cancel.
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to Gallery
- Click on 'add' or 'edit' next to the Gallery Title or Description
- Type in some nonsense text into the textbox.
- Click on Cancel
- Now click on 'add' or 'edit' again.
Expected behavior:
- Text in edit box should revert back to previous content
Actual behavior:
- Text in edit box is cached from previous edit or add, which presumably is the *wrong* text since you hit Cancel.
I'm getting the expected behavior here. Can you provide more details on the gallery, the browser, version, and OS pls? Thanks Darryl.
I'm surprise nobody's posted on this previously. The big nifty slideshow you guys implemented a month or two ago causes a really nasty memleak.
I've done some extensive testing. And for galleries that don't contain a lot of images, it usually isn't noticable. But if you have a gallery that has a few hundred images, and then let the slideshow play, it eats up all your ram.
This occurs on Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista x64 SP1 so far on both Firefox 3 Beta 5, IE6 and IE7 with the latest flash plugins.
Below is a screen I took this morning as I was testing with Firefox and then with IE on my Vista box. And then IE6 on my XP box.
My testing indicates that the flash application is caching all the files it downloads into memory instead of a cache file on disk(probably so IE7 doesn't flip out.). This is evident due to the fact that if you resize the window smaller, it downloads smaller images, filling up the ram slower than the fullscreen version. The larger the slideshow the faster it accumlates. The following tests were done with 15 minutes of slideshow watching. Please see if you can reproduce the issue. I'm fairly certain you can as it's not isolated to any platform or browser.
Windows XP SP2, Internet Explorer 6
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1, Internet Explorer 7(SMALLER window)
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1, Firefox 3 Beta 5(FULLSCREEN)
Modus Imagery
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
The embedable flash slideshow does the same thing. However, it's typically not much of an issue because it doesn't stay on screen as long and it usually is in moderate sizes. Just FYI. Should take a look at the Flickr Slideshow, it only caches the NEXT photo and drops the previous, if the user goes backwards it has to redownload the image. There's no reason for these slideshows to be caching the entire gallery.
Modus Imagery
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
I'm getting the expected behavior here. Can you provide more details on the gallery, the browser, version, and OS pls? Thanks Darryl.
Hi Andy -- this happens on numerous galleries I've got on ccns.smugmug.com, and gladlee.smugmug.com (which have extensive CSS and JS customizations), but also on darryl.smugmug.com (which has almost none).
I don't think it matters.
I've replicated the problem on Windows XP Professional ver 2002, SP 2 with both IE 6.0.2900.2180 as well as Firefox 2.0.0.14.
Not that it matters, but I can also replicate on Ubuntu Linux 7.04 with Firefox 2.0.0.11 (oooh, I'm behind on my updates).
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to Gallery
- Click on 'add' or 'edit' next to the Gallery Title or Description
- Type in some nonsense text into the textbox.
- Click on Cancel
- Now click on 'add' or 'edit' again.
Expected behavior:
- Text in edit box should revert back to previous content
Actual behavior:
- Text in edit box is cached from previous edit or add, which presumably is the *wrong* text since you hit Cancel.
Thanks Darryl! It seems to happen on all kinds of text boxes we have across the site that use AJAX. Browser doesn't seem to matter - happens on Mac and even as a visitor when you're entering a caption and hit cancel (might be good in this case).
The embedable flash slideshow does the same thing. However, it's typically not much of an issue because it doesn't stay on screen as long and it usually is in moderate sizes. Just FYI. Should take a look at the Flickr Slideshow, it only caches the NEXT photo and drops the previous, if the user goes backwards it has to redownload the image. There's no reason for these slideshows to be caching the entire gallery.
I just did a quick test on my Mac using your 400+ photo gallery. I didn't let it run long enough to reach memory consumption values that you had, but I could see that it does seem to cache all photos in the gallery.
Then I tried a tiny gallery to see if there was a real leak of some sort. The slideshow looped many times, but the memory consumption didn't increase, so there doesn't seem to be a memory leak.
Andy made our slideshow developer aware of caching issue that you see with large galleries.
I just did a quick test on my Mac using your 400+ photo gallery. I didn't let it run long enough to reach memory consumption values that you had, but I could see that it does seem to cache all photos in the gallery.
Then I tried a tiny gallery to see if there was a real leak of some sort. The slideshow looped many times, but the memory consumption didn't increase, so there doesn't seem to be a memory leak.
Andy made our slideshow developer aware of caching issue that you see with large galleries.
This is indeed the case, currently I suck photos into the cache and never let them go, which makes for a very responsive short-medium experience but becomes a liability on a longer run. In the tubes is a change so I'll drop images out of the cache after X images but there is no definite timeline on that atm.
I just did a quick test on my Mac using your 400+ photo gallery. I didn't let it run long enough to reach memory consumption values that you had, but I could see that it does seem to cache all photos in the gallery.
Then I tried a tiny gallery to see if there was a real leak of some sort. The slideshow looped many times, but the memory consumption didn't increase, so there doesn't seem to be a memory leak.
Andy made our slideshow developer aware of caching issue that you see with large galleries.
Hahaha, did you at least enjoy the photos?
Thanks a lot for looking into it for me.
Modus Imagery
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
Small size 1:1 ratio pictures
When I open my 1:1 (square) pictures they are not sized as large as they should to fit the window in the lightbox.
I have a 1920x1200 monitor.
Comments
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
I just noticed that when I'm looking at leebutlerphoto.com/popular the comments for the first photo don't go away as I click on each thumbnail to view other images. I'm using the SmugMug gallery style.
Shouldn't comments match the photo the customer is viewing?
Lee
LeeButlerPhoto.com
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Done. smugmug.com/leebutlerphoto doesn't redirect now.
LeeButlerPhoto.com
http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/4726262_xnk6Z/1/280716061_5Fktp#280716061_5Fktp
which removes your javascript etc, then it performs normally. Did you add any new functions recently?
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Actually, it turned out to be the Amazon Associates widget I added. It must be interfering somehow.. I removed the DIV tag below and it works normally again. Since it is loading javascript from Amazon's servers, it looks like it's out of my hands... In CSS I had it hidden on every page but the Home page, but {display: none} apparently still executes the code even when it's hidden.
Have a better recommendation for showing the widget on the Home page but not gallery pages? I'm all ears... <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/ear.gif" border="0" alt="" >
<*div id="recommendReading"*>
<*SCRIPT charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822/US/leebutler-20/8001/e4e1f927-fc82-4205-85d3-53086e1cf972"*> <*/SCRIPT*> <*NOSCRIPT*><*A HREF="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822/US/leebutler-20/8001/e4e1f927-fc82-4205-85d3-53086e1cf972&Operation=NoScript"*>Amazon.com Widgets<*/A*><*/NOSCRIPT*>
<*br/*>
<*/div*>
CSS
#recommendReading {
position: relative;
width: 750px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
margin-top: -25px;
display: none;
}
.homepage #recommendReading { display: compact; }
LeeButlerPhoto.com
You could use Javascript to insert the Amazon div only on the home page. Then no Amazon code would execute on other pages because it would have never been inserted there.
You are correct that Javascript execution happens regardless of whether anything is hidden or not via CSS. Javascript execution is independent of CSS rules (except that it can change CSS rules).
Homepage • Popular
JFriend's javascript customizations • Secrets for getting fast answers on Dgrin
Always include a link to your site when posting a question
Thanks. I've looked around and it sounds like inserting Script tags on div.innerHTML is problematic on some browsers so I'll just drop the widget.
Maybe I'll create a page just to display widgets. I might have a Zazzle or CafePress merchandise widget too someday...
LeeButlerPhoto.com
When logged in and on a keyword page. (for instance I click on one of the "Top 200 Photo Keywords from the homepage). Clicking on 'Edit this Caption/Keywords' OR 'Edit Captions/Keywords (BULK)' under the keyword tools just goes to a blank page.
I am using the latest version of Firefox on Windows XP and I have a pro account.
Example For admin's. (Must be logged in to get the Keyword tools Drop Down menu.)
http://blazerphoto.smugmug.com/keyword/military#275208597_CHsXp
I found that while logged in and choosing Create a Card from the 'photo tools' drop down menu that it seems to freeze at "Click 'Categories' below and choose an occasion." I click on the Categories but nothing happens. Is this because there are no categories set up at this time?
Firefox 2.0.0.14, Win XP, Smug Pro Account
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Hi Andy - You wrote me yesterday and said that there was a bug that was sending the galleries to the bottom of a gallery instead of the beginning. Is there a way to move the gallery or do you know when the bug will be fixed? I would really like to move the newest gallery from the bottom. I just rried creating a new gallery and it went to the bottom too.
Tracy
www.tlcphotos.net
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
This is the gallery
http://www.tlcphotos.net/Weddings
When you're logged in via. a custom domain name, the share link does not change from the username.smugmug.com standard. It *should* change to mydomain.com...
David
Twitter: @WolfSnap
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WolfSnapDesigns
SmugMug & Wordpress Customization - WolfSnap.com | Custom Domains
Thanks.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
This one's been annoying me for a while:
- Go to Subcategory
- Arrange a bunch of galleries
- Click on Save.
Expected Behavior:
- Taken back to Subcategory page
Actual Behavior:
- Taken back to Home page
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to Gallery
- Click on 'add' or 'edit' next to the Gallery Title or Description
- Type in some nonsense text into the textbox.
- Click on Cancel
- Now click on 'add' or 'edit' again.
Expected behavior:
- Text in edit box should revert back to previous content
Actual behavior:
- Text in edit box is cached from previous edit or add, which presumably is the *wrong* text since you hit Cancel.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Hey guys,
I'm surprise nobody's posted on this previously. The big nifty slideshow you guys implemented a month or two ago causes a really nasty memleak.
I've done some extensive testing. And for galleries that don't contain a lot of images, it usually isn't noticable. But if you have a gallery that has a few hundred images, and then let the slideshow play, it eats up all your ram.
This occurs on Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista x64 SP1 so far on both Firefox 3 Beta 5, IE6 and IE7 with the latest flash plugins.
Below is a screen I took this morning as I was testing with Firefox and then with IE on my Vista box. And then IE6 on my XP box.
My testing indicates that the flash application is caching all the files it downloads into memory instead of a cache file on disk(probably so IE7 doesn't flip out.). This is evident due to the fact that if you resize the window smaller, it downloads smaller images, filling up the ram slower than the fullscreen version. The larger the slideshow the faster it accumlates. The following tests were done with 15 minutes of slideshow watching. Please see if you can reproduce the issue. I'm fairly certain you can as it's not isolated to any platform or browser.
Windows XP SP2, Internet Explorer 6
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1, Internet Explorer 7(SMALLER window)
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1, Firefox 3 Beta 5(FULLSCREEN)
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
Hi Andy -- this happens on numerous galleries I've got on ccns.smugmug.com, and gladlee.smugmug.com (which have extensive CSS and JS customizations), but also on darryl.smugmug.com (which has almost none).
I don't think it matters.
I've replicated the problem on Windows XP Professional ver 2002, SP 2 with both IE 6.0.2900.2180 as well as Firefox 2.0.0.14.
Not that it matters, but I can also replicate on Ubuntu Linux 7.04 with Firefox 2.0.0.11 (oooh, I'm behind on my updates).
I have not yet tried it on Mac yet.
Yes, I've cleared all of the SmugMug cookies.
I'll report it to our engineers.
Sebastian
SmugMug Support Hero
Then I tried a tiny gallery to see if there was a real leak of some sort. The slideshow looped many times, but the memory consumption didn't increase, so there doesn't seem to be a memory leak.
Andy made our slideshow developer aware of caching issue that you see with large galleries.
SmugMug Support Hero
This is indeed the case, currently I suck photos into the cache and never let them go, which makes for a very responsive short-medium experience but becomes a liability on a longer run. In the tubes is a change so I'll drop images out of the cache after X images but there is no definite timeline on that atm.
Sam
Hahaha, did you at least enjoy the photos?
Thanks a lot for looking into it for me.
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
When I open my 1:1 (square) pictures they are not sized as large as they should to fit the window in the lightbox.
I have a 1920x1200 monitor.
http://www.dennismullen.com/gallery/3112001_6uQKL#294362125_7vYVz
Sebastian
SmugMug Support Hero
SmugMug Support Hero